Copyright Claims: Lawbreakers Or Legal?

Copyright claims are legal requests to remove content from online platforms due to alleged copyright infringement. Copyright infringement occurs when someone exercises one or more of the exclusive rights held by a copyright owner without their permission. These rights include reproducing, distributing, displaying, or performing the protected work, or creating derivative works. Copyright holders can invoke legal measures to prevent and penalize copyright infringement, and disputes are usually resolved through direct negotiation, a notice and takedown process, or litigation in civil court. While the terms piracy and theft have been used to describe copyright infringement, courts have distinguished between these terms, noting that copyright infringement does not equate to theft of physical objects.

Copyright infringement

Copyright holders routinely invoke legal and technological measures to prevent and penalize copyright infringement. Copyright infringement disputes are usually resolved through direct negotiation, a notice and takedown process, or litigation in civil court. Large-scale commercial infringement, especially when it involves counterfeiting, is sometimes prosecuted via the criminal justice system.

In recent years, copyright holders have increasingly focused on the role of service providers and software distributors in facilitating individual acts of copyright infringement.

Criminal vs civil claims

Copyright infringement is the act of exercising, without permission or legal authority, one or more of the exclusive rights granted to the copyright owner. These rights include the right to reproduce or distribute a copyrighted work. Most copyright infringement disputes are resolved through direct negotiation, a notice and takedown process, or litigation in civil court. However, in some cases, copyright infringement can lead to criminal charges.

Civil copyright infringement occurs when a party seeks to protect their copyrights against unauthorized use by filing a civil lawsuit in federal district court. This typically involves two private parties and can result in civil penalties, including actual damages or "statutory" damages ranging from $750 to $30,000 per work infringed. For "willful" infringement, the court may award up to $150,000 per work infringed, along with potential costs and attorneys' fees.

On the other hand, criminal copyright infringement is a violation of federal law when a person intentionally uses or distributes another's copyrighted material for financial gain. Criminal charges are typically pursued by the government and can result in criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines. To prove criminal copyright infringement, the government must provide evidence of four things:

• The author had a valid copyright.
• The defendant used, copied, or distributed the material without the author's permission.
• It was done intentionally.
• It was done for personal financial gain or business advantage.

Felony charges can be filed when ten copies of a copyrighted work are reproduced or distributed with a retail value of more than $2,500. Misdemeanor charges can be filed with just one copy and a retail value of $1,000. Criminal penalties for willful copyright infringement can include up to five years of imprisonment and fines up to $250,000 per offense.

While civil copyright infringement focuses on compensating the copyright owner for damages, criminal copyright infringement seeks to punish intentional and financially motivated violations of copyright law. The threshold for criminal charges is higher, requiring evidence of intentional and financially-motivated conduct.

Defendant's intent

In copyright law, the defendant's intent is a crucial factor in establishing liability. It is essential to prove that the defendant acted "willfully," meaning they intentionally infringed upon the plaintiff's copyright with knowledge of their actions. This standard is applied in both civil and criminal copyright infringement cases, though the burden of proof differs. In a civil lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove the defendant's willful infringement by a "preponderance of the evidence." In contrast, criminal copyright infringement requires the prosecutor to establish willfulness "beyond a reasonable doubt."

The determination of willfulness can be nuanced and depend on the specific facts of each case. Courts generally consider whether the defendant knew or should have known that their actions constituted copyright infringement. This includes assessing the defendant's knowledge of the existence of a copyright and their understanding of the potential consequences of their actions. In some instances, courts may also examine if the defendant sought to obtain "commercial advantage or private financial gain" from their infringement.

The defendant's intent can significantly influence the outcome of a copyright infringement case. If willfulness is established, it can lead to more severe penalties and damages awarded to the plaintiff. In civil cases, willful infringement may result in enhanced statutory damages, with fines ranging from $750 to $150,000 per work infringed. Additionally, the defendant may be subject to criminal penalties, including imprisonment of up to five years and fines of up to $250,000 per offense. On the other hand, if the defendant's actions are found to be innocent or made in good faith, it can mitigate the penalties imposed by the court.

The concept of "fair use" also comes into play when assessing defendant's intent. Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, and research. If the defendant can demonstrate that their use of the copyrighted work falls within the scope of fair use, it can serve as a defense against infringement claims. However, determining fair use involves a case-by-case analysis, and specific guidelines vary across jurisdictions.

In summary, the defendant's intent is a critical aspect of copyright infringement cases. It involves examining their knowledge, purpose, and potential financial motivation. By establishing willfulness, plaintiffs can seek more substantial remedies, while defendants found to have acted innocently may face reduced penalties. Additionally, the fair use doctrine provides a defense for certain limited uses of copyrighted material, further complicating the assessment of defendant's intent in these complex legal disputes.

Copyright vs trademark

Copyright claims are not breaking the law per se, but they are a way to assert copyright ownership. Copyright owners can submit a copyright removal request, also known as a "takedown notice" if they find their copyright-protected content being used without their authorization. This is a legal request to remove content from being published, and it is required by law that sites like YouTube process these requests.

Copyright and trademark are two different types of intellectual property (IP) protection. A copyright is a collection of individual rights that you automatically have once you create an original work that is fixed in a tangible medium like a photograph, a book, or an mp3 file. These rights include the right to reproduce the work, to prepare derivative works, to distribute copies, to perform the work publicly, and to display the work publicly.

A trademark, on the other hand, is a word, phrase, symbol, and/or design that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods or services of one party from those of others. For example, the name Coca-Cola is a trademark for soft drinks, and the swoosh is the logo trademark for Nike's athletic brand. Trademarks can be registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While it is not necessary to register a trademark, there are certain legal benefits to doing so.

The main difference between copyright and trademark is that copyright protects original expressions in creative works, whereas trademarks protect the business reputation and goodwill associated with words, phrases, symbols, and designs. Trademarks prevent consumer confusion and protect your business name, saying, or logo from being used by others to sell goods or services. Copyright, on the other hand, protects your right to exclusively reproduce, distribute, and perform or display the creative expression and prevents others from exploiting it without your permission.

Fair use

Copyright claims are not inherently illegal. Copyright owners can submit a claim to protect their content. However, there are circumstances where a quote or sample may be used without permission under the fair use doctrine.

• The purpose and character of the use: Courts are more likely to consider non-profit educational and non-commercial uses as fair. Additionally, "transformative" uses are more likely to be considered fair. These are uses that add something new, with a further purpose or different character, and do not substitute for the original use of the work.
• The nature of the copyrighted work: This factor analyzes the degree to which the copyrighted work is creative or imaginative. Using a highly creative or imaginative work (e.g. a novel, movie, or song) is less likely to support a claim of fair use than using a factual work (e.g. a technical article or news item). Additionally, using an unpublished work is less likely to be considered fair.
• The amount and substantiality of the portion used: Courts consider both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material used. Using a large portion of the copyrighted work makes fair use less likely, while using a small amount makes it more likely. However, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work may be considered unfair if it is an important or "heart" part of the work.
• The effect of the use on the potential market: Courts review whether the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner's original work. This includes considering whether the use could cause substantial harm if it became widespread.

It is important to note that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined amount of a work can be used without permission. While one factor may weigh more heavily than another in determining fair use, all four factors must be considered, and no single factor can determine whether the use falls within the fair use exception.

Frequently asked questions