The Law And Black People: A Complex History

For over 400 years, laws in the United States have profoundly shaped, defined, and constrained the lives of Black people. In this paragraph, we will explore the topic of whether there are any laws that specifically apply to Black people, examining the historical context and the ongoing struggle for racial equality.

The US Constitution, statutes, court cases, and regulations

American laws and jurisprudence have profoundly impacted Black people's lives for over 400 years, with racial inequality deeply ingrained in the country's history. The US Constitution, statutes, court cases, and regulations have both reflected and perpetuated this inequality, as outlined below:

The US Constitution

The US Constitution has been interpreted and amended over time to address racial inequality, with significant amendments including:

• The Thirteenth Amendment (1865): Abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime.
• The Fourteenth Amendment (1868): Granted citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans and emancipated slaves after the Civil War.
• The Fifteenth Amendment (1870): Prohibited the federal and state governments from denying citizens the right to vote based on race, color, or previous servitude status.

Statutes

Numerous statutes have been enacted to address racial inequality and protect the rights of Black Americans. Notable examples include:

• Civil Rights Act of 1866: Declared all male persons born in the US as citizens, regardless of race or previous enslavement.
• Civil Rights Act of 1875: Enacted to protect the civil and legal rights of African Americans, ensuring equal treatment in public accommodations and transportation and prohibiting exclusion from jury service.
• Civil Rights Act of 1964: Ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination based on race, colour, religion, sex, or national origin.
• Voting Rights Act of 1965: Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, this Act aimed to remove legal barriers at the state and local levels that prevented African Americans from voting, as guaranteed by the Fifteenth Amendment.

Court Cases

Court rulings have had a significant impact on the legal rights of Black Americans, with some perpetuating inequality and others promoting change:

• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): The Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, regardless of free or slave status, were not US citizens and could not sue in federal court.
• Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): The Supreme Court upheld a Louisiana law allowing the segregation of blacks and whites in railroad passenger cars, legitimizing the idea of "separate but equal" public facilities.
• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954): A landmark case where the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.
• Loving v. Virginia (1967): A landmark civil rights decision by the Supreme Court that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.

Regulations

Executive orders and regulations have also played a role in addressing racial inequality:

• Executive Order 8802 (1941): Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, this order prohibited racial discrimination in the national defense industry.
• Executive Order 9981 (1948): Issued by President Truman, this order established equality of treatment and opportunity in the Armed Forces.
• Executive Order 10590 (1955): President Dwight D. Eisenhower created the President's Committee on Government Policy to enforce non-discrimination in federal employment.
• Executive Order 11246 (1965): Established requirements for non-discriminatory practices in hiring and employment by federal government contractors.

Black Codes

The Black Codes were a series of laws passed throughout the South in the wake of emancipation. Although often professing to respect the equality and civil rights of the newly emancipated, in reality, most of the Black Codes were specifically designed to curtail the economic, political, and social freedom of African Americans. They were also designed to restore much of the slave system that had existed before the Civil War.

The Black Codes, sometimes called the Black Laws, were laws that governed the conduct of African Americans, both free and freed. They existed before the Civil War, and many Northern states had them, but the Southern states codified such laws in everyday practice. The best-known Black Codes were passed by Southern states in 1865 and 1866, after the Civil War, to restrict African Americans' freedom and compel them to work for low or no wages.

The Black Codes were part of a larger pattern of Democrats trying to maintain political dominance and suppress the freedmen, or newly emancipated African Americans. They were particularly concerned with controlling the movement and labour of freedmen, as slavery had been replaced by a free labour system. Although freedmen had been emancipated, their lives were greatly restricted by the Black Codes.

The defining feature of the Black Codes was the broad vagrancy law, which allowed local authorities to arrest freed people for minor infractions and commit them to involuntary labour. This period was the start of the convict lease system, described as "slavery by another name".

The Black Codes restricted Black people's right to own property, conduct business, buy and lease land, and move freely through public spaces. Another important part of the codes were the annual labour contracts, which Black people had to keep and present to authorities to avoid vagrancy charges.

Mississippi was the first state to pass Black Codes, beginning with "An Act to Confer Civil Rights on Freedmen". This law allowed Blacks to rent land only within cities, effectively preventing them from earning money through independent farming. It required Blacks to present, each January, written proof of employment. The law defined a violation of this requirement as vagrancy, punishable by arrest, for which the arresting officer would be paid $5, taken from the arrestee's wages.

The next state to pass Black Codes was South Carolina, which ratified the Thirteenth Amendment with a qualification that Congress did not have the authority to regulate the legal status of freedmen. Newly elected governor James Lawrence Orr said that Blacks must be "restrained from theft, idleness, vagrancy and crime, and taught the absolute necessity of strictly complying with their contracts for labour".

Racial segregation

In the United States, racial segregation was mandated by law in some states and enforced alongside anti-miscegenation laws (prohibitions against interracial marriage) until the mid-20th century. The 13th Amendment, passed in 1865, abolished slavery in the US, but this was followed by the introduction of Jim Crow laws, which codified racial discrimination. These laws mandated strict segregation of the races and were formalised after the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877.

The period that followed the Reconstruction era is known as the nadir of American race relations. While the US Supreme Court majority in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case explicitly permitted "separate but equal" facilities (specifically, transportation facilities), Justice John Marshall Harlan, in his dissent, protested that the decision would "stimulate aggressions ... upon the admitted rights of coloured citizens", "arouse race hate", and "perpetuate a feeling of distrust between [the] races".

Segregation was not limited to public facilities but extended to housing, employment, and education. In 1915, Oklahoma became the first state to segregate public phone booths. Colleges were also segregated, and separate Black institutions like Howard University in Washington, D.C., and Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee, were created to compensate.

The civil rights movement, initiated by Southern Blacks in the 1950s and '60s, aimed to break the prevailing pattern of racial segregation. This movement spurred the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which contained strong provisions against discrimination and segregation in voting, education, and the use of public facilities.

By 1968, all forms of segregation had been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and by 1970, support for formal legal segregation had dissolved. However, implicit racism continues to this day through avenues like occupational segregation.

Police misconduct and racial bias

The history of policing in the US is deeply intertwined with the legacy of slavery. Before the Civil War, "slave codes" were enacted in Southern states to restrict the freedoms of African Americans and compel them to work for little to no wages. After the war, "Black codes" were introduced, which similarly limited the rights of African Americans, including their movement, political participation, and economic opportunities. These codes were enforced by slave patrols, comprising white citizens who were authorised to supervise and punish enslaved Black people.

Despite the formal abolition of slavery and the introduction of civil rights legislation over the subsequent decades, racial bias in policing has endured. This is evidenced by the disproportionate targeting and use of force against people of colour, particularly Black individuals, by law enforcement. Studies have found that Black Americans are killed by police at twice the rate of white Americans, and that racial minorities are more likely to be unarmed when killed by police. Additionally, people of colour are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, with higher rates of arrest, conviction, and incarceration compared to their white counterparts.

Implicit and explicit racial biases among police officers contribute significantly to these disparities. Research has shown that officers' visual attention is drawn towards Black faces when primed with words related to crime, and they are more likely to associate "stereotypically Black" features with criminality. Moreover, police departments often face systemic challenges in addressing racism within their ranks, including powerful unions and state laws that protect officers from misconduct investigations.

To address police misconduct and racial bias, comprehensive reforms are necessary. This includes diversifying police forces, implicit bias training, and increased community involvement in law enforcement practices. However, critics argue that these efforts have had limited success in reducing biased behaviours and violent conduct. More profound changes, such as diverting resources from policing to community services and social welfare programs, are proposed as potential solutions to reduce the need for policing and improve community safety.

The issue of police misconduct and racial bias in the US is deeply entrenched and multifaceted, requiring a range of approaches to foster meaningful and lasting change.

Racist drug laws

In the United States, American jurisprudence and law have profoundly shaped, defined, and constrained the lives of Black people for over 400 years. While there are no laws that explicitly apply only to Black people, there is a long history of racist laws and policies that have disproportionately impacted Black communities. One area where this is evident is in drug laws and their enforcement.

Drug laws in the United States have a long history of being racially biased and have been used as a tool to target and marginalize Black and Brown communities. This pattern of racial bias in drug law enforcement has been documented across the country and is not limited to specific regions or political ideologies. Despite similar rates of drug use and sales across racial and ethnic groups, Black and Brown individuals are targeted for stops, arrests, prosecution, and imprisonment at much higher rates.

One example of this disproportionate enforcement is the case of the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) and their collaboration with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) in 2013. During this operation, the SFPD selectively targeted Black individuals selling small amounts of drugs, even though people of all races were involved in the drug trade. This resulted in all 37 individuals federally prosecuted being Black, despite 40% of those engaged in the drug trade being white and Latinx. The SFPD's actions were found to be racially motivated, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) successfully sued the department for violating the constitutional rights of the Black individuals targeted.

The roots of racist drug laws in the United States can be traced back to the early 20th century, when laws were enacted to prohibit the smoking of opium. These laws were often motivated by fears of Chinese immigration and racial anxieties about the "other." Over time, drug laws have continued to be shaped by racism and have been used as a tool to target and marginalize communities of color. For example, the war on drugs has been criticized as a vehicle for restoring Jim Crow-style justice and perpetuating systemic racism.

The impact of racist drug laws extends beyond law enforcement and has contributed to the mass incarceration of Black and Brown individuals. Tough-on-crime policies, such as mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses, have disproportionately affected communities of color and fueled the growth of the prison-industrial complex. Additionally, the criminalization of drug use has had devastating consequences for public health, particularly in communities of color, as it has hindered harm reduction efforts and diverted resources away from treatment and support services.

To address these issues, there have been growing calls for drug policy reform, including the decriminalization of drug use and possession, as well as a shift towards a public health approach that prioritizes harm reduction and community-based solutions. By doing so, it may be possible to disrupt the cycle of racial injustice perpetuated by racist drug laws and their enforcement.

Frequently asked questions