Judicial Contempt: Can Judges Be Guilty Too?

Contempt of court, or simply contempt, is a crime that involves disobeying, disrespecting, or undermining a court of law and its officers. It is broadly categorized into disrespecting legal authorities in the courtroom and willfully failing to obey a court order. While contempt powers are crucial for maintaining order in judicial proceedings, they are among the least-regulated areas of judicial power in the American legal system. This article will explore the question: can a judge be found guilty of contempt of law?

Can a judge be found guilty of contempt of law?

What constitutes contempt of court?

Contempt of court, often simply called "contempt", is the crime of being disobedient to or disrespectful towards a court of law and its officers. It is an offence against a court of justice or a person to whom the judicial functions of sovereignty have been delegated. The verb "to commit contempt" is "contemn", as in "to contemn a court order", and a person guilty of this is a contemnor or contemner.

Contempt can be broadly classified into two categories: being disrespectful to legal authorities in the courtroom, or willfully failing to obey a court order. The latter is also referred to as indirect contempt. Direct contempt occurs when someone commits an act of disrespect or disorderly conduct in the presence of a judge. Civil contempt arises when someone fails to comply with a court order intended to benefit another party. Constructive contempt refers to behaviour that violates a court order outside of the courtroom and outside the personal knowledge of a judge.

Contempt of court is a serious legal issue and can result in various penalties. In the United States, the federal court may impose a fine of $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than six months, but not both. In California, a person found guilty of violating a valid court order may face fines, imprisonment in county jail, or even a jury trial in some cases. In England and Wales, the maximum penalty for criminal contempt is imprisonment for two years. In Canada, a person found to be in contempt may be imprisoned for less than two years or fined.

What are the punishments for contempt of court?

Contempt of court is broadly categorised as either civil or criminal contempt. While the rules vary by rate, the federal court may impose a fine of $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than six months, but not both. Civil contempt occurs when someone fails to comply with a court order. This could be for anything from failing to pay child support to failing to adhere to a court order requiring the individual to turn over documents. Civil contempt punishments are considered "coercive" sentences, which are conditional and can be avoided by doing as the court ordered.

Criminal contempt, on the other hand, is a criminal charge that occurs when someone deliberately attempts to obstruct justice by threatening a witness, discussing a trial with a jury member, or hiding or contaminating evidence. It can also occur when someone willfully and repeatedly disobeys a court's orders. The punishments for criminal contempt are considered "punitive" sentences, which are generally unconditional and definite. In a criminal contempt case, the offender is tried in front of a jury, and when the sentence is handed down, there is a definite jail term and release date. For example, in Georgia, individuals guilty of criminal contempt may be sentenced to no more than twenty days of jail time and may be fined up to $1,000.

Direct contempt of court is punishable without trial, whereas indirect contempt must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard. Direct contempt is committed knowingly in the immediate view and presence of the court, whereas indirect contempt covers actions outside of the courtroom. In England and Wales, the maximum penalty for criminal contempt is committal to prison for two years.

In some jurisdictions, contempt of court may also include the refusal to respond to a subpoena, to testify, to fulfil the obligations of a juror, or to provide certain information. The punishment for contempt of court varies by jurisdiction, and judges have a great deal of discretion when applying penalties.

Can a judge be held in contempt of court?

Contempt of court is the crime of being disobedient to or disrespectful towards a court of law and its officers, in a way that opposes or defies the authority, justice, and dignity of the court. There are two categories of contempt: disrespecting legal authorities in the courtroom and willfully failing to obey a court order.

In the United States, the Judiciary Act of 1789 conferred power on all courts to "punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all contempts of authority in any cause or hearing before the same". The only limitation placed on this power was that summary attachment was made a negation of all other modes of punishment. The abuse of this extensive power led to the passage of the Act of 1831, which limited the power of the federal courts to punish contempts to misbehaviour in the presence of the courts, or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice.

In England and Wales, the law on contempt is partly set out in case law (common law) and partly codified by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The maximum penalty for criminal contempt under the 1981 Act is committal to prison for two years. Disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent behaviour toward the judge or magistrates while holding the court, tending to interrupt the due course of a trial or other judicial proceeding, may be prosecuted as "direct" contempt. Direct contempt is different from indirect contempt, wherein another individual may file papers alleging contempt against a person who has willfully violated a lawful court order.

In Canada, contempt of court is the only remaining common law offence. Under the Tax Court of Canada Rules of Tax Court of Canada Act, a person who is found to be in contempt may be imprisoned for a period of less than two years or fined. In British Columbia, a justice of the peace can only issue a summons to an offender for contempt, which will be dealt with by a judge, even if the offence was done in the face of the justice.

While I could not find explicit information on whether a judge can be held in contempt of court, there are examples of judges being removed from cases and even impeached due to their abuse of contempt powers. For example, in the United States, Judge Peck of the Federal District Court of Missouri was impeached and tried before the US Senate for abuse of judicial authority. In another instance, Judge Glanville was removed from a case after Attorney Steele appealed a decision regarding alleged contempt.

Therefore, while it is not explicitly stated that a judge can be held in contempt of court, there are mechanisms in place to hold them accountable for any abuse of their contempt powers.

What are the limits of a judge's power?

Judges have a wide range of powers, including interpreting laws, minimising obscurities, settling uncertain or conflicting situations, and enforcing the rights of parties. They also have the power to issue legal orders, such as injunctions, and to impose sanctions and punishments for acts of contempt.

However, there are limits to a judge's power. Judges are independent of other powers, and their decisions are respected and executed. In some countries, such as the United States, the power to vest judicial power in the Supreme Court and other inferior courts lies with Congress. In the US, the Supreme Court's power of judicial review ensures that each branch of government recognises its own limitations. For example, the Supreme Court can strike down laws that violate the Constitution, protecting civil rights and liberties.

In the 18th century, the summary power to punish contempt was extended to all contempts, whether committed in or out of court. However, this led to abuse, and in 1831, the power of federal courts in the US to punish contempt was limited to misbehaviour in the presence of the courts, or so near as to obstruct the administration of justice, misbehaviour of court officers in their official capacity, and disobedience or resistance to any lawful writ, process, or order of the court.

In England and Wales, contempt of court is partly set out in case law and partly codified by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The maximum penalty for criminal contempt under this Act is imprisonment for up to two years. Disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent behaviour towards the judge or magistrates while holding court may be prosecuted as "direct" contempt. Direct contempt is different from indirect contempt, where someone may file papers alleging contempt against a person who has willfully violated a court order.

What are the rights of a contemnor?

A contemnor is a person who has been found to be in contempt of court, which means that they have ignored or disobeyed a court order. When a court issues a ruling, it expects everyone involved to follow it. If someone chooses not to comply, they can be labelled a contemnor. This label carries serious consequences, as the court has the power to impose sanctions or punishments on that person.

The rights of a contemnor vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of contempt. In some jurisdictions, contempt of court is classified as criminal or civil. Criminal contempt is used to protect the judicial system and is generally meant to recognize an offence against public justice. Civil contempt, on the other hand, is the refusal of a person in a civil case to obey a mandatory order. For example, in Michigan, an individual charged with criminal contempt is afforded some of the same rights as a criminal defendant. In Pennsylvania, if a court's purpose for finding contempt is to coerce the contemnor to comply with a court order, the charge will be one of civil contempt. However, if the court's purpose is to punish the contemnor for disobedience, the charge will be one of criminal contempt.

The punishment for contempt of court also varies by jurisdiction. In some cases, the punishment may be imprisonment, a fine, or both. For example, under the Tax Court of Canada Rules of Tax Court of Canada Act, a person found to be in contempt may be imprisoned for up to two years or fined. Similarly, the maximum penalty for criminal contempt under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 in England and Wales is imprisonment for two years. In the United States, the Judiciary Act of 1789 conferred power on all courts to "punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all contempts of authority in any cause or hearing before the same." The federal court may impose a fine of $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than six months, but not both.

It is important to note that being labelled a contemnor can have lasting effects. It can impact a person's reputation and future dealings with the court. Courts take contempt seriously because it undermines the authority of the judicial system and can lead to chaos and unfairness in legal proceedings. Therefore, it is always best to comply with court orders and seek legal advice if necessary.

Frequently asked questions