Law Firms: Debt Collection Or Legal Service?

When a debtor owes a creditor money, the creditor can either use a collection law firm or a collection agency to recover the debt. While both entities share similarities, there are also some key differences. This article will explore the question: can a law firm be a collection agency?

Law firms and collection agencies: differences and similarities

When a creditor is seeking to collect a debt, they can enlist the help of either a collection law firm or a collection agency. While both entities share similarities, there are also some key differences.

Similarities

Both collection law firms and collection agencies can send a demand letter and call the debtor to request the outstanding amount owed. They are both subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

Differences

Collection agencies are limited in their ability to take action to collect a debt. They typically engage in constant and continued contact with the debtor via letters or telephone calls. Collection agencies also often handle large portfolios of claims and refer them to multiple collection law firms when a claim is ready for suit. If a debtor refuses to pay and it becomes necessary to file a suit, a collection agency will have to engage a third-party law firm to do so.

On the other hand, collection law firms can file suit, enforce a judgment, and use legal mechanisms limited to the state jurisdiction where the attorneys are licensed to practice. They are also able to use legal enforcement mechanisms, such as the issuance of information subpoenas with restraining notices against a debtor's bank accounts and wage executions. Law firms focus on a smaller number of claims that are appropriate for suit in court.

It is important to note that, while less common, some collection law firms may employ staff collectors to handle low minimum balances, allowing them to pursue debt collection for smaller debts.

Additionally, collection agencies are not required to be licensed attorneys, whereas debt collection attorneys are held to a high ethical standard and must follow certain rules and guidelines, such as the Rules of Professional Conduct for Pennsylvania attorneys.

In terms of cost, it is a common misconception that hiring an attorney will be more expensive than a collection agency. In fact, most attorneys charge less than what you would pay for a collection agency's services.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that both collection law firms and collection agencies can enter into settlement or payment agreements with debtors for outstanding debts. However, collection agencies are unable to file suit against a debtor, so they may report late payments to credit bureaus to encourage payment.

Collection agencies and their limitations

Debt collection agencies and law firms share a similar purpose: to help creditors recover funds from debtors. However, there are key differences and limitations to be aware of when it comes to collection agencies.

Collection agencies are third-party companies that lenders or creditors hire to recover funds from debtors who are past due or in default. They are often engaged when a borrower is 60-90 days delinquent, and this information is typically reported to major credit bureaus. Collection agencies are generally more expensive than law firms, and they are limited in their ability to take legal action against debtors. They are bound by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which outlines specific rules for contacting and collecting debts from debtors. For example, they cannot legally seize a debtor's assets unless they have won a lawsuit against them, and they are restricted in how many times they can contact a debtor within a given period.

Collection agencies often handle large portfolios of claims and refer them to multiple collection law firms when legal action is required. This is because collection agencies themselves cannot file lawsuits against debtors. They rely on constant and continued contact with debtors, either by letter or telephone, to request outstanding payments. If a debtor refuses to pay, a collection agency may report late payments to credit bureaus as a tool to encourage payment.

On the other hand, collection law firms employ attorneys who are licensed to file the necessary paperwork to bring a case to court and pursue legal action if initial communication attempts are unsuccessful. Law firms can file suits, enforce judgments, and use legal mechanisms, but their abilities to obtain and enforce judgments are limited to the jurisdictions where the firm's attorneys are licensed.

It is important to note that debt collectors have a limited amount of time, known as the "statute of limitations," to take legal action against a debtor. This period typically starts when a debtor misses a payment, and it varies depending on the type of debt and state laws. If the statute of limitations expires, the debt becomes time-barred, and it is illegal for debt collectors to sue debtors for non-payment. However, they may still attempt to collect the debt through other means, such as phone calls or letters.

In summary, while both collection agencies and law firms play a role in debt recovery, collection agencies have limitations in terms of legal action and are primarily focused on communication and negotiation with debtors. Collection law firms, on the other hand, have the advantage of being able to pursue legal remedies in addition to communication and negotiation.

Law firms acting as collection agencies: legal or not?

A law firm may assist in collecting a debt, but if they do, they are subject to the same rules and restrictions as any other creditor or collection agency. Both debt collection law firms and debt collection agencies are regulated by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). However, the methods they can use to collect the debt differ. Debt collection agencies are limited in their ability to take action to collect a debt. This usually involves constant and continued contact, either by letters or telephone calls, with a debtor to pay all or a portion of the debt. While debt collection law firms can also take those actions, they are equipped to pursue further action if these constant communications are unsuccessful.

Collection agencies often handle large portfolios of claims and refer them to multiple collection law firms when a claim is ready for suit. Collection law firms, on the other hand, are able to use legal enforcement mechanisms upon entry of judgment against debtors. This can include the issuance of information subpoenas with restraining notices against a debtor's bank accounts and wage executions. Law firms also focus on a smaller amount of claims that are appropriate for suit in court.

It is important to note that when a law firm sends a collection letter to the consumer regarding the debt, they must be clear that they are acting only as a debt collector. This rule exists because collection agencies know that a letter from an attorney is more likely to frighten the consumer into paying the debt than a letter from a collection agency. In Florida, using attorney letterheads and signatures to send out collection letters without an attorney's direct involvement is a prohibited form of creditor harassment.

In conclusion, law firms can act as collection agencies, but they must follow the same rules and restrictions as other collection agencies and clearly state that they are acting as debt collectors.

Debt collection methods: legal vs illegal

Debt collection agencies and law firms are bound by several laws designed to eliminate unjust debt collection practices. These laws include the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and other state laws. These laws restrict debt collectors from engaging in unethical or unprofessional conduct, such as harassment, that may deceive, defraud, or harm the consumer.

Legal Debt Collection Methods

Both debt collection agencies and law firms can send demand letters and make phone calls to request the outstanding amount owed. They may also enter into settlement or payment agreements with debtors. Debt collection law firms, however, have the added advantage of being able to file suits, enforce judgments, and use legal mechanisms within the state jurisdiction where the attorneys are licensed. This can include issuing subpoenas, restraining notices against debtors' bank accounts, and wage executions. Law firms also tend to focus on a smaller number of claims that are suitable for court proceedings.

Illegal Debt Collection Methods

Debt collectors are prohibited from using abusive, deceptive, or unfair practices to collect debts. This includes harassment, threats, and repeated contact, which can contribute to personal bankruptcies, marital instability, job loss, and invasions of individual privacy. Debt collectors must also respect consumers' preferences for communication methods and times. They are generally restricted from contacting consumers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. and at their place of work if they know it is prohibited. Additionally, debt collectors must provide certain information about the debt and may not publicly post about it on social media.

Commercial vs consumer collection law firms

Commercial and consumer collection law firms differ in several ways, including the types of clients they serve, the resources available to them, and the strategies they employ for debt collection.

Commercial collection law firms typically work with businesses to recover overdue payments from other businesses. These debts often arise from transactions between companies, such as the provision of goods or services. Commercial firms tend to be larger and more experienced, with a greater number of attorneys and staff members. They are well-versed in navigating the complexities of collecting debts from companies that may have multiple assets that can be seized to settle the debt.

On the other hand, consumer collection law firms focus on collecting debts from individuals. This includes personal credit card debts, medical debts, unpaid mortgages, and utility bills. Consumer debts are typically lower in value compared to commercial debts. Consumer collection law firms may not have the same level of resources as their commercial counterparts, which can impact their access to certain tools and strategies during court proceedings or other legal actions.

The strategies employed by commercial and consumer collection law firms can also differ. Commercial debt collection may involve communicating with accounts payable, credit managers, and executive teams within companies. Commercial collection firms may also have a better understanding of the regulations and complexities surrounding business transactions. In contrast, consumer debt collection strategies are regulated by the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), which outlines how debt collectors can contact consumers to seek payments. This may include Skip-tracing, which involves locating the individual and obtaining their most accurate contact information.

It is worth noting that the lines between commercial and consumer debt collection have blurred in recent years. For example, a law firm may receive a debt collection case against a sole proprietor, blurring the lines between commercial and consumer debt. As a result, debt collectors and lawyers must have a comprehensive understanding of consumer legislation and its potential impact on commercial debts.

Frequently asked questions