Law Firm Representation Of Opposing Parties: Ethical?

In the UK, the question of whether a law firm can represent both parties hinges on the potential for a conflict of interest. While dual representation was once common, it is now less frequent due to the risks associated with conflicting interests. The SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors and the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms prohibit acting for a client if there is a conflict of interest or significant risk of one. This conflict may arise from a clash between the duty to act in the best interests of different clients or between the solicitor's interests and those of a client. However, there are limited circumstances where dual representation may be permissible, such as when both parties have a substantially common interest or compete for the same objective, and both provide informed consent.

Conflict of interest

In the context of conveyancing, where a law firm may represent both the buyer and the seller in a property transaction, conflict of interest is a crucial consideration. While it is generally not advisable for the same solicitor to represent both parties due to the high risk of conflict, there are limited circumstances where it may be permissible. For instance, if both parties have a substantially common interest or are working towards the same objective, and both consent to the firm continuing to act on the sale and purchase, dual representation may be possible.

However, even in these cases, strict criteria must be met. Both parties must be longstanding clients of the firm, fully informed of the risks, and the firm must implement appropriate safeguarding measures. Additionally, each solicitor involved must be subject to separate supervision to maintain confidentiality and avoid access to personal information they would not usually have.

Despite the potential benefits of using the same law firm, such as streamlining the process and reducing costs, the risk of conflict of interest remains high. If a conflict arises, both solicitors must immediately cease acting, and both parties will need to instruct new solicitors, resulting in delays and increased costs.

Therefore, it is essential to carefully consider the potential for conflict and make informed decisions to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and maintain the best interests of all involved parties.

Dual representation

In the UK, the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs, and the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms, prohibit solicitors from acting for a client if there is a conflict of interest or a significant risk of a conflict. This includes situations where a solicitor's duty of confidentiality to one client conflicts with their duty of disclosure to another.

However, there may be limited circumstances where dual representation is appropriate and permissible. For example, in conveyancing transactions, the same conveyancer or law firm may represent both the buyer and the seller if certain criteria are met. These criteria typically include:

• Both parties have a substantially common interest or are competing for the same objective.
• Both parties are longstanding clients of the firm and provide informed consent.
• There is no conflict of interest or significant risk of a conflict.
• The firm takes appropriate safeguarding measures and ensures transparency about potential risks and conflicts.

Even in situations where dual representation is allowed, solicitors must remain vigilant and carefully consider each case to ensure they can act impartially and in the best interests of both clients. If a conflict arises during the process, they must cease acting for both parties immediately.

Client consent

In the UK, client consent is a critical factor in determining whether a law firm can represent both parties. While it is generally not recommended due to potential conflicts of interest, there are specific scenarios where dual representation may be permissible with client consent.

Firstly, it is essential to recognise that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct prohibits solicitors from acting for clients if there is a conflict of interest or a significant risk of a conflict. This conflict arises when a solicitor's duty to act in the best interests of one client clashes with their duty to another client. For instance, in a property dispute, a solicitor cannot advise one client to settle or sue, as it would go against the interests of the other client.

However, in certain limited circumstances, a law firm may represent both parties with client consent. This typically occurs when both clients have a substantially common interest or share the same objective. For example, when parents sell a property to their child below market value, their interests are aligned, and they have a shared goal of transferring the property at a reduced cost as a gift. In such cases, both the buyer(s) and seller(s) must provide their consent for the firm to act on the sale and purchase.

Additionally, it is crucial that both parties are fully informed and aware of the risks involved. The law firm must ensure that clients understand the potential conflicts and outcomes of the case. Separate supervision of each solicitor representing the clients within the same firm is also necessary to maintain confidentiality and avoid personal information conflicts.

While client consent is essential, it is not the sole determining factor. The decision to represent both parties ultimately rests on the law firm's ability to act impartially and in the best interests of both clients. They must also consider the potential for conflicts that may arise during the legal process, as these may require both solicitors to cease acting immediately, resulting in additional costs and delays for the clients.

Confidentiality issues

The Law Society and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) have strict rules regarding conflicts of interest to ensure solicitors act in their clients' best interests. According to the SRA Code of Conduct, solicitors must avoid conflicts of interest and act in the best interests of their clients. They must also consider the potential risks and conflicts involved in dual representation and ensure that both parties are fully informed of their rights and the potential outcomes of the case.

In some cases, dual representation may be permissible if both parties provide informed consent and the solicitor can maintain impartiality. For example, in family law matters where both parties are amicable and agree on the terms of their arrangement, a solicitor may represent both sides as long as there is no conflict of interest. Similarly, in business transactions, dual representation may be allowed if both parties have a substantially common interest and provide informed consent.

However, it is essential to note that confidentiality issues can still arise even with informed consent. For instance, if a solicitor represents two companies that are direct competitors in a merger or acquisition, the interests of the two companies may be directly opposed, creating a conflict of confidentiality. In such cases, the solicitor must decline to act for both parties to maintain client confidentiality and avoid conflicts of interest.

To mitigate confidentiality issues, separate supervision of solicitors representing each party is recommended. This ensures that solicitors are not exposed to personal information about the other party that they would not typically have access to if represented by different firms. Additionally, both parties must understand and accept that their solicitor cannot negotiate on their behalf to maintain confidentiality.

Code of Conduct

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct sets out rules and guidelines for solicitors. According to the SRA Code of Conduct, solicitors must avoid conflicts of interest and ensure that they act in the best interests of their clients.

Under the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs, and RFLs, and the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms, a solicitor cannot act for a client if there is a conflict of interest or a significant risk of a conflict. This includes situations where the solicitor's duty to act in the best interests of two or more different clients may conflict or where the solicitor's interests and those of a client may conflict.

There may be limited circumstances where it is appropriate for a solicitor to act for both parties. If a solicitor does this, they should ensure that their decision is in the best interests of both clients and be able to justify their decision to the SRA. The solicitor should also make sure that both parties are fully informed of their rights and the potential outcomes of the case.

In the context of conveyancing, the same conveyancer can represent both the buyer and the seller if certain criteria are met and there is no conflict of interest. This may include situations where both parties are already longstanding clients of the firm, have a substantially common interest, or are competing for the same objective.

It is important to note that each solicitor within the same firm must be subject to separate supervision when acting for both parties to ensure they are not privy to personal information about the other party that they would not usually have access to.

Frequently asked questions