Law Firm Workers: Private Law Cases, Allowed?

Law firms and lawyers can be selective about the cases they take on, and they may pass on a case if they believe the client will be hard to work with, or if they think the case will damage their reputation. Lawyers are also unable to represent clients if doing so would conflict with a current client's interests. In most cases, clients hire a law firm and not a specific attorney, so it is possible that a lawyer from the firm passes on a case to another lawyer within the same firm. In such cases, the client is usually informed of the switch, and the new lawyer is given access to the client's file to familiarize themselves with the case.

Law firms may refuse to take a case if they believe it will tarnish their image

Law firms are not obligated to take on every case that comes their way. There are several reasons why a law firm may refuse to take on a case, and one of them is the potential damage to their image or reputation.

Law firms are businesses, and like any business, they rely on their reputation to attract and retain clients. If a case or a client is likely to tarnish their image, law firms may choose to decline it. For example, Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was rejected by at least eight law firms in his quest to sue the NBA because they thought he was "toxic". If a case or a client has the potential to scare away a firm's current or future clients, the firm may decide to protect its reputation and business interests by refusing to take on the case.

Additionally, law firms may refuse to take on a case if they believe it has a low chance of success or lacks merit. They may also decline if they perceive the client to be difficult to work with, obnoxious, or abrasive. Lawyers can also refuse a case if they believe the client is being dishonest or if the case goes against their ethical standards or the law. Conflicts of interest are another reason for refusal, as lawyers must avoid representing clients with adverse interests.

It is important to note that clients always have the option to seek representation elsewhere if a law firm refuses to take their case. While it can be discouraging to be turned down, it is not uncommon for clients to shop around for legal representation until they find a firm that is a good fit for their case and their personality.

Lawyers are not required to inform clients if they pass a case to another lawyer in the same firm

If a client is uncomfortable with the switch, they can discuss it with the firm and request a different attorney. However, changing firms altogether is unlikely to be beneficial. In most well-run firms, this is a rare occurrence, and they will work to accommodate the client's concerns. It is important to review the fee agreement and determine the terms of the attorney-client relationship. The client is always entitled to fire their attorney if they are unhappy with the arrangement.

When it comes to passing a case to another law firm, the original contract may allow the hired law firm to associate with other firms or lawyers without the need for a new contract. This is especially common in cases that go beyond negotiation into litigation. While it is generally recommended that the client be informed, there may be situations where a case progresses or even settles without the client being aware of the change in representation.

In terms of fees, the total share of the settlement going to lawyers is typically the same and then split between the firms involved. However, clients should be aware of potential conflicts of interest that may arise when multiple firms or lawyers are involved. Informed consent from the client is usually required when there is a significant risk of the lawyer's action on behalf of one client limiting their effectiveness in representing another.

Law firms can pass a client to another firm without a new agreement being signed

In most cases, clients hire a law firm and not a specific attorney in the firm. Many firms with multiple attorneys will assign one attorney to a case throughout, but this is not always the case. Sometimes, another attorney may take over due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness. In such situations, the client should be informed, and they can discuss any concerns with the firm.

When it comes to transferring cases to another law firm, the original contract between the client and the first law firm is crucial. Typically, these contracts include provisions that allow the hired law firm to associate with other qualified firms or lawyers without requiring a new contract, especially when the case progresses from negotiation to litigation. This practice is common among personal injury firms that primarily seek quick settlements, and they often have agreements with firms that handle court cases.

However, it is essential to note that the client's consent and awareness of the involvement of a second firm are necessary for fee-sharing arrangements. While the total fee paid by the client may remain the same, it is split between the two firms involved. In some states, like Georgia, a contingent fee agreement must be signed and agreed upon by the client for the second firm to be entitled to any fee.

While it is uncommon, there may be situations where a client objects to the representation by a second firm, especially if they feel they were not properly informed or notified of the change. In such cases, the client always has the right to fire their attorney or law firm and seek alternative representation.

To summarise, while it is generally permissible for a law firm to pass a client to another firm without a new agreement being signed, it is essential to refer to the original contract, ensure transparency, and obtain the client's consent, especially regarding fee arrangements.

Law firms expect to be paid and may refuse a case if the potential recovery amount is too low

Law firms are businesses, and like any business, they expect to be paid for their services. Most law firms will not take on a case unless they believe their fees will be justified by the potential recovery amount. This is a primary reason why law firms may refuse to take on a case.

Firms are also conscious of their reputations and may refuse a case if they believe it will tarnish their image or scare away current clients. For example, Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was rejected by at least eight law firms when he tried to sue the NBA because they deemed him "toxic". Law firms have a duty not to represent clients with adverse interests, so if taking on a new client conflicts with an existing client, they may refuse the case.

Lawyers are also people, and if they perceive a potential client to be hard to work with, obnoxious, or abrasive, they may choose to pass on the case.

It is important to note that law firms are not required to be flexible with their fee agreements, and they are under no obligation to take on a case. If a law firm refuses a case, it is usually because they do not believe it is a good fit for their business or their lawyers.

Law firms may refuse a case if they believe the client will be hard to work with

Law firms may refuse to take on a case for a variety of reasons, one of which is the potential client's behaviour. If a law firm believes that a client will be hard to work with, they may choose not to represent them. This could be due to the client being perceived as obnoxious, abrasive, or generally difficult to collaborate with.

Firms are also conscious of their reputation and may refuse a case if they believe the client or the case's publicity will scare away current clients or tarnish their image. For example, Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was rejected by at least eight law firms because they thought he was "toxic".

Additionally, law firms may refuse a case if they believe the potential client will be unable to pay their fees or if the potential recovery amount will not be enough to justify their fees. Lawyers have an ethical duty not to represent clients with adverse interests, so a conflict of interest with a current client is another reason a law firm may refuse to take on a new case.

It is important to note that if a law firm refuses to take on a case, it does not necessarily reflect poorly on the merits of the case itself. There are many reasons why a law firm may choose to decline representation, and it is common for individuals to consult multiple law firms before finding one that is the right fit for their case.

Frequently asked questions