Understanding When A Lawsuit Can Be Dismissed

Lawsuits can be thrown out in several ways, and for a variety of reasons. The most common procedures for throwing out a lawsuit are a Demurrer and a Motion for Summary Judgment. A Demurrer is the first responsive pleading that the defence files, and to be successful, it must show two things with respect to the plaintiff's cause of action. A Motion for Summary Judgment is usually brought later in the case, after discovery has taken place and key depositions have been taken. Other reasons for a lawsuit to be thrown out include the court lacking jurisdiction, the complaint failing to state a claim, or the period of limitations having passed. If the parties are able to reach a compromise before the trial, the case will settle, and this is the way that the vast majority of civil cases end.

Characteristics and Values of Throwing Out a Lawsuit

Failure to state a claim

A lawsuit can be thrown out of court if it has no merit. One of the reasons a case can be thrown out is a "motion to dismiss", which is usually brought shortly after a lawsuit is filed. A motion to dismiss can be filed if the court does not have jurisdiction, or if the complaint fails to state a claim.

In the case of a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff must establish the elements of negligence, such as duty, breach, causation, and harm. For instance, let's say the defendant hit the plaintiff with their car. The plaintiff would need to prove that the defendant had a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused the accident, resulting in harm to the plaintiff. If the plaintiff fails to sufficiently establish these elements, the defendant can file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.

It is important to note that failure to state a claim can also occur if there is no legal relationship between the plaintiff and defendant that would give rise to the claim for relief. This means that if the plaintiff's complaint does not establish a valid legal connection between the parties, the case may be dismissed.

Court lacks jurisdiction

A lawsuit can be thrown out of court if the court lacks jurisdiction. Jurisdiction may be broken down into two categories: personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. While personal jurisdiction governs where the parties may be heard, subject matter jurisdiction governs what the court can hear specifically.

In the US, state courts are presumed to have the power to hear virtually any claim arising under federal or state law, except those falling under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts. For example, if a citizen of New York sues a citizen of California for $75,001, a federal court would have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear that claim. However, some states may deny subject matter jurisdiction to specific claims, such as those arising in other states.

The question of whether the court has jurisdiction only has to be addressed if the defendant raises the issue. The defendant may assert a lack of jurisdiction at any time, and the court must dismiss the case if it determines that there is insufficient evidence of jurisdiction for the matter to go to the jury. If there is a genuinely disputed question of fact regarding jurisdiction, the issue should be submitted to the jury, who must decide the issue and return a special verdict.

In the case of a settlement, disputes may arise regarding whether the parties have complied with the terms of the settlement agreement. Therefore, whenever a lawsuit is filed, there is always a possibility that the dispute will drag on for a long time.

Statute of limitations

A statute of limitations is a law that bars claims after a certain period following an injury. In civil law systems, such provisions are part of civil and criminal codes. The cause of action dictates the statute of limitations, which can be adjusted to ensure a full and fair trial. The intention of these laws is to facilitate resolution within a "reasonable" period, although what is considered "reasonable" varies from country to country and even within jurisdictions. For example, in the US, the statute of limitations for fraud in COVID-era unemployment programs was five years but was extended to ten years.

The limitation period generally begins when the plaintiff's cause of action accrues, i.e., when they first become aware of an injury or when they are first able to maintain a cause of action in court. A statute of repose is similar but differs in that it is based on a particular event, such as the completion of a building, and does not permit extensions.

In some jurisdictions, such as New South Wales, Australia, a claim can be filed outside the limitations period, but the defendant must plead that the claim is time-barred as part of their defence, or else the claim will not be statute-barred.

While statutes of limitations can be used to dismiss a case, there are other ways to end a lawsuit. The vast majority of civil cases end in a settlement, where the parties reach a compromise before the trial. If a motion for summary judgment fails and no settlement is reached, the case will go to trial, after which the judge or jury will decide on a verdict and any damages to be awarded.

Settlement reached

A lawsuit can be thrown out in several ways, including a motion to dismiss, a demurrer, a motion for summary judgment, or a settlement. A settlement is a resolution between disputing parties about a legal case, reached either before or after court action begins. It is a contract between the plaintiffs and defendants identified in the lawsuit, allowing them to end the dispute without a trial. Settlements are common, with empirical analysis finding that less than 2% of cases end with a trial, 90% of torts settle, and around 50% of other civil cases settle.

Settlements can be reached at any point before a trial, and they often occur early in the litigation process. Both sides have a strong incentive to settle to avoid the costs, time, and stress associated with a trial. A settlement conference may be held, during which the parties attempt to reach an agreement.

The settlement of a lawsuit defines the legal requirements of the parties involved and is typically put in force by a court order after a joint stipulation. For example, a settlement may require a company to pay civil penalties, change its policies, and be subject to monitoring. In the case of a settlement, disputes may still arise regarding compliance with the terms of the agreement.

Class action lawsuits are a type of collective settlement, designed to hold companies accountable for misleading or deceiving their customers. When a class action lawsuit settles, potential claimants may be notified via mail or email and provided with instructions on how to claim their portion of the settlement. However, there is no guarantee that everyone who could collect their portion of a settlement will come forward, and unclaimed funds may be returned to the defendant company.

Demurrer or Motion for Summary Judgment

A lawsuit can be thrown out of court in several ways. Two of the most common ways in California State Superior Court are a "Demurrer" and a "Motion for Summary Judgment".

Demurrer

A demurrer is a motion brought before the court at the beginning of a lawsuit to attack all or some of a lawsuit. It is the first responsive pleading that the defence files if they decide to attack the plaintiff's complaint. A demurrer assumes the truth of the facts alleged by the complaining party but challenges the complaint as a matter of law. It must show two things with respect to the plaintiff's cause of action (the grounds for their lawsuit):

• That the complaint fails to state a cause of action, i.e. even if everything in the complaint is true, it does not state a cause of action.
• That the complaint fails to state a claim.

A demurrer is not technically a motion. Rather, it is a particular type of pleading and demurring is the act by which a party formally requests the court to dismiss a cause of action (claim) or the entire complaint. It is decided by a judge rather than a jury. The judge either grants the demurrer by sustaining it or denies it by overruling the demurrer. If the demurrer is sustained, the denial of leave to amend may constitute an abuse of discretion. If the demurrer is overruled, the defendant is ordered to file an answer within a certain period, or else they risk a default judgement.

Motion for Summary Judgment

A motion for summary judgment (MSJ) is brought later in the case, but still before the trial, after discovery has taken place and key depositions have been taken. It is an evidentiary motion, requiring the opposing party to present their evidence. The court considers the evidence submitted and grants the MSJ if it determines that the moving party is entitled to a judgement as a matter of law. This means that there is no need to go to trial because the evidence is such that, even if the responding party is allowed to develop more evidence, they cannot overcome the moving party.

Frequently asked questions