President Vs Citizen: Can A Leader Sue?

While it is uncommon for a president to sue someone while in office, it is not unheard of for a president to bring a lawsuit against a citizen. In the United States, four sitting presidents have faced lawsuits for private actions. Presidents can be prosecuted and must comply with any subpoenas once they leave office. Civil lawsuits against a sitting president can proceed to trial, but they can be delayed until the end of the president's term if the lawsuit interferes with their constitutional duties. Criminal charges can be brought against a sitting president, but civil cases typically need to wait until their term ends.

Citizens can sue a president with the help of a civil litigation attorney

While the president does have a degree of immunity from prosecution, citizens can sue a president with the help of a civil litigation attorney. This is a well-established practice with a long history of lawsuits against presidents.

Citizens can sue a sitting president for criminal charges that occurred while they were in office, whether the acts were official or unofficial. This was demonstrated in the case of former President Donald Trump, who was denied absolute immunity for a state criminal subpoena in 2020. Before and after a president's time in office, they are subject to the same laws as any other citizen.

In terms of civil lawsuits, a sitting president can be sued for actions that occurred before they took office. For example, in Clinton v. Jones (1997), Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, sued President Clinton for sexual harassment that allegedly occurred before he became president. The Supreme Court ruled that a sitting president could be subject to a civil lawsuit related to alleged misconduct before taking office. However, civil lawsuits against a sitting president for official actions typically need to wait until the president's term has ended, as it is argued that a trial would be too distracting for a current president.

When suing a president, it is important to note that finding a lawyer to take on the case can be difficult without ironclad evidence. An attorney can help determine the correct party to sue to get the best chance of recovering damages and provide advice on the process and rules for suing the government. For example, the statute of limitations on most government claims is two years, so a claim must be submitted within two years of the situation.

Presidential immunity can be claimed if a lawsuit interferes with presidential duties

While citizens can bring lawsuits against a sitting president, the concept of presidential immunity has been used to protect the president from litigation that interferes with their duties. This means that presidential immunity can be claimed if a lawsuit interferes with presidential duties.

The history of lawsuits against presidents is long, with four sitting presidents having been sued for private actions. In 1997, a Supreme Court case was based on Paula Jones' lawsuit against President Bill Clinton. In 2016, Summer Zervos sued President Trump for defamation, and two other women, model Karen McDougal and adult film actress Stormy Daniels, filed similar lawsuits.

The doctrine of presidential immunity has developed over time through the judicial process involving civil cases filed against the head of the executive branch. While the Constitution does not explicitly grant immunity to the President, the concept of presidential immunity dates back to the 1860s. In 1866, Mississippi tried to sue President Andrew Johnson regarding the Reconstruction Acts, but the case was dismissed.

The Supreme Court has held that presidents are "absolutely immune" in civil cases when the action in question falls within the "outer perimeter" of their official duties. This means that courts do not have jurisdiction over civil lawsuits for damages that stem from a president's official acts. Presidential immunity protects against the diversion of time and energy, allowing for more effective governance and protecting the public interest.

However, it is important to note that presidential immunity is not absolute in all circumstances. Immunity only applies to official acts carried out as president and does not extend to unofficial conduct, criminal acts, or actions taken before taking office. For example, President Bill Clinton was not protected from a sexual harassment lawsuit based on conduct before he took office. Additionally, the Supreme Court has held that presidents are amenable to subpoenas and are not immune from state criminal subpoenas.

Media must report on all lawsuits against a president due to freedom of speech rights

The media has an obligation to report on all lawsuits against a president due to freedom of speech rights. The people have a right to know about any lawsuits against a president, whether the case leads to impeachment, delayed action, or the claim is dropped.

There is a long history of lawsuits against presidents in the United States, with four sitting presidents having been subject to suits for private actions. While presidential immunity can apply if a lawsuit interferes with the president's constitutional duties, the Supreme Court has ruled that presidents are not immune to criminal charges while in office. This means that criminal charges can be brought against a sitting president, and civil cases can be brought once their term has ended.

Two notable cases have set much of the precedent for presidential lawsuits. The first is Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982), in which A. Earnest Fitzgerald brought a lawsuit against several government officials, including President Richard Nixon. The second is Clinton v. Jones (1997), in which Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, sued President Clinton for sexual harassment that allegedly occurred before he took office. The Supreme Court ruled that a sitting president could be subject to a civil lawsuit related to alleged misconduct before taking office, and Jones continued the lawsuit after Clinton left office.

In summary, the media must report on all lawsuits against a president to uphold freedom of speech rights and ensure the public's right to know. While presidential immunity can apply in some cases, presidents are not immune to criminal charges, and civil cases can be brought once their term has ended. Notable cases like Nixon v. Fitzgerald and Clinton v. Jones have set important precedents for presidential lawsuits.

Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) set a precedent for lawsuits against the president

The United States has a long history of lawsuits against presidents. Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) is one such case that set a precedent for lawsuits against the president. The case was brought by A. Earnest Fitzgerald, a management analyst with the Department of the Air Force, who testified before a congressional subcommittee about cost overruns and technical difficulties related to the development of a particular airplane during the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968.

In January 1970, during the presidency of Richard Nixon, Fitzgerald was dismissed from his job as part of a departmental reorganization and reduction in force, and his job was eliminated. He complained to the Civil Service Commission, alleging that his dismissal was unlawful retaliation for his congressional testimony. The Commission rejected this claim but agreed that his dismissal was motivated by "reasons purely personal to" Fitzgerald.

The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled in a 5-4 decision that the President is entitled to absolute immunity from legal liability for civil damages based on official acts. This set a precedent for the principle of presidential immunity, which can be applied if a lawsuit is deemed to interfere with the President's constitutional duties.

Despite this precedent, there have been several other instances of citizens filing lawsuits against sitting presidents, including Summer Zervos, Karen McDougal, and Stormy Daniels suing President Trump for defamation, and Paula Jones' lawsuit against President Bill Clinton, which formed the basis of a 1997 Supreme Court case.

Citizens can investigate a sitting president and gather evidence of a crime

While citizens can sue a sitting president, the reverse is not true—a sitting president cannot bring a lawsuit against a citizen.

Citizens can investigate a sitting president, and there is a long history of lawsuits against presidents. For example, in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982), A. Earnest Fitzgerald brought a lawsuit against several government officials, including President Richard Nixon. Nixon was also investigated as part of the Watergate scandal, and while he was not indicted, he resigned in 1974 facing impeachment.

Other presidents who have been subject to criminal investigations while in office include Clinton and Trump. During the presidency of Donald Trump, Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation determined that he could investigate Trump, but he could not indict him. This was based on the 1973 and 2000 OLC memoranda, which state that a sitting president cannot be indicted and is "constitutionally immune" from criminal prosecution. This is because criminal charges against a sitting president would "violate the constitutional separation of powers."

Despite this immunity, citizens can still gather evidence of a crime committed by a sitting president. For example, in the case of Nixon and Watergate, the special counsel investigating the case wrote an internal memorandum in 1974 concluding that Nixon could be indicted. While Nixon was not indicted and instead resigned, this shows that citizens can gather evidence and make a case for indictment, even if it is ultimately not pursued.

Frequently asked questions