Martial Law: Can A President Make This Call?

The question of whether a president can declare martial law is a complex one, with no clear answer. While the US President does have the power to impose martial law in certain circumstances, the authority to do so is not explicitly granted by the Constitution. The Constitution also does not define martial law or specify who can impose it. Throughout history, martial law has been declared over 60 times, and in recent times, events in South Korea have sparked discussions about the possibility of a US president declaring martial law. While some scholars argue that the president has the executive power to declare martial law, others believe that congressional authorization is required. The Supreme Court has also provided inconsistent statements on the matter, neither confirming nor denying the president's ability to declare martial law.

The US President's power to declare martial law

The US Constitution does not define martial law and does not specify who can impose it. The US President's power to declare martial law is a highly debated topic. Some scholars argue that the President has the executive power to declare martial law. However, others believe that the President requires congressional authorization to impose martial law in a civilian area.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled that the President or federal government can declare martial law. The Posse Comitatus Act, enacted by Congress in 1878, prevents the US military from participating in civilian law enforcement activities, which limits the President's ability to declare martial law.

Despite the lack of a clear constitutional provision, the President has certain powers that can be interpreted as granting them some degree of authority to declare martial law. For example, the Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the President to deploy military forces domestically to enforce federal laws and maintain public order. Additionally, the President can suspend habeas corpus and civil rights throughout the US, as demonstrated by President Lincoln's actions during the Civil War.

In summary, while there is no explicit constitutional grant of power, the US President may have some authority to declare martial law, especially with congressional authorization. However, the specific limits and enforcement mechanisms of martial law remain unclear due to sparse and inconsistent legal precedents.

State officials' power to declare martial law

The power of state officials to declare martial law is a complex and contentious issue in the United States. While the Constitution does not explicitly grant the president the power to declare martial law, it is generally accepted that state officials, including governors, have the authority to do so within their respective states.

State officials have historically declared martial law in response to civil unrest, natural disasters, or to break labour strikes. The decision to impose martial law is typically made in conjunction with state law, and federal courts will often defer to the governor's judgement. However, the actions taken under martial law must still abide by the US Constitution and are subject to review in federal court.

The Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878, is a federal law that prevents the US military from engaging in civilian law enforcement activities. This poses a challenge when martial law is declared, as it grants the military commander virtually unlimited authority to govern an area, suspending local laws, civil authorities, and sometimes the local judiciary. This power dynamic turns the typical relationship between civilian and military power on its head, and thus, the Posse Comitatus Act acts as a check on the implementation of martial law.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled that the president or federal government can declare martial law. However, the Court has implied that the federal government may have this power, but it is unclear if congressional authorization is required. The Insurrection Act, specifically Section 253, may authorize a limited form of martial law, allowing the president to use the National Guard or armed forces to suppress insurrection or domestic violence if it hinders the execution of state or federal laws.

In conclusion, state officials possess the power to declare martial law within their states, but their actions are constrained by the Constitution and are subject to federal court review. The authority to declare martial law remains a contentious issue, with sparse and inconsistent legal precedent, leaving many questions unanswered.

The US Congress' power to declare martial law

The US Constitution does not define martial law and does not specify who can impose it. However, the US Congress has certain powers that can be considered relevant to the declaration of martial law.

Firstly, Article I of the US Constitution establishes Congress, which is comprised of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress has several war powers that act as checks on the commander-in-chief, including the impeachment power. This suggests that Congress has a role in overseeing the use of military force and holding those who misuse it accountable.

Secondly, Congress has the power to legislate and pass laws that impact the president's ability to declare martial law. For example, in 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids US military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. This Act creates a general rule that it is unlawful for federal military forces to engage in civilian law enforcement activities without explicit congressional authorization.

Thirdly, Congress has the power to authorize a presidential declaration of martial law. For example, in 1863, President Lincoln imposed Congressionally authorized martial law on Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri. Similarly, in 2006, Congress passed the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act, which gave the president the power to declare martial law and take command of the National Guard units of each state without the consent of state governors.

Finally, Congress has the power to repeal laws that enable the president to declare martial law. For example, in 2008, Congress repealed the 'Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order' law, which had allowed the president to invoke the Act and declare martial law where public order broke down due to natural disasters, epidemics, or terrorist attacks.

In summary, while the US Constitution does not explicitly grant Congress the power to declare martial law, Congress does have significant powers related to the use of military force and the authorization of presidential actions. These powers suggest that Congress plays a crucial role in overseeing and authorizing the declaration of martial law in the United States.

The US Supreme Court's stance on martial law

The US Constitution does not explicitly grant the President the power to declare martial law. The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled that the President or the federal government can declare martial law. However, the Court has implied that the federal government can declare martial law, but it has never been conclusively stated.

The Supreme Court's stance on martial law is influenced by various factors, including the interpretation of the Constitution, historical precedent, and the separation of powers between Congress and the President. The Court has suggested that a federal martial law power could be "implied in sovereignty" or justified by "necessity." On the other hand, the Posse Comitatus Act, passed by Congress in 1878, prohibits the US military from engaging in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval, limiting the President's ability to declare martial law.

The Supreme Court has also addressed the legality of martial law in specific cases. For example, in Ex parte Milligan (1866), the Court ruled that President Lincoln's imposition of martial law by suspending habeas corpus was unconstitutional in areas where local courts were still functioning. Additionally, in Duncan v. Kahanamoku (1946), the Court clarified that it would interpret statutes authorizing the military to interfere with civilian governments very narrowly.

While the Supreme Court has provided some guidance on martial law, its statements have been inconsistent, and many legal questions remain unanswered. The Court has not explicitly addressed whether the President can unilaterally declare martial law or if Congress's authorization is required. The modern interpretation suggests that the President and state officials can declare "degrees of martial law" in specific circumstances, but the exact limits of this power are unclear.

Martial law in the US: historical examples

Martial law has been declared at least 60 times in the US, with some sources citing 68 instances. The US Constitution does not define martial law and does not specify who can impose it. However, the modern interpretation allows the president and state officials to declare "degrees of martial law in specific circumstances". Here are some historical examples of martial law in the US:

1814: West Florida and Louisiana

In the final months of 1814, the British Navy launched an offensive in the southern United States, targeting West Florida and Louisiana.

1932: Oklahoma Oil Fields

A non-violent dispute between the state government and oil producers over oil production limits led to a declaration of martial law by Governor William "Alfalfa Bill" Murray.

1935: Vigo County, Indiana

A general strike in Terre Haute, Indiana, led to Governor Paul V. McNutt declaring martial law. It lasted from July 22, 1935, until February 10, 1936—a period of 6 months and 19 days.

1938: Newton, Iowa

A labour dispute at the Maytag Corporation in 1938 resulted in Governor Nelson Kraschel declaring martial law. It lasted from July 20, 1938, until August 19, 1938—a total of 30 days.

1941: Hawaii

On December 7, 1941, the Honolulu Star-Bulletin announced that the islands were under martial law. The military used this opportunity to force Hawaiians of Japanese descent off their land and into internment camps.

1857-1858: Utah Territory

Governor Brigham Young declared martial law to facilitate armed resistance to approaching federal troops. Hostilities ended on June 12, 1858, when Young accepted President James Buchanan's pardon and was removed from power.

Frequently asked questions