Executive Power: Can A President Revoke Past Laws?

The US President has a variety of powers and responsibilities, including the ability to make treaties with the approval of the Senate, veto and sign bills, and represent the nation in talks with foreign countries. However, the President does not have the power to create laws. Laws are created by Congress, and the President is responsible for enforcing those laws. So, while a new President can work with Congress to create and pass new laws that supersede or contradict past laws, they cannot directly change or override laws created under a previous administration.

Presidents cannot make laws

The US President's role is to enforce the laws passed by Congress and to recommend new laws to their consideration. The President can also make suggestions about things that should be new laws. However, the President cannot make laws.

The President's legislative role has grown substantially since 1900. This development reflects changes in political and social forces rather than any pronounced change in constitutional interpretation. The rise of parties and the accompanying recognition of the President as the party leader, the appearance of the National Nominating Convention, and the introduction of the Spoils System all contributed to the expansion of the President's legislative role.

While the President can recommend laws to Congress, they are not obliged to impart information that, in their judgment, should be withheld from the public interest. Additionally, the President has the power to convene or adjourn the Houses of Congress in certain circumstances.

The President's role in law-making is limited to suggesting and recommending new laws to Congress. The power to make laws rests with Congress, and the President's role is to ensure that these laws are enforced and executed faithfully.

Presidents can veto and sign bills

The US Constitution gives the president the power to veto and sign bills. Once a bill has passed both houses of Congress, it is presented to the president for approval. The president then has ten days, excluding Sundays, to approve or veto the bill.

If the president approves of the bill, they are required to sign it, and it becomes law. The president is not required to write the word "approved" or the date of approval on the bill. They can sign it within ten days, even if Congress has adjourned.

If the president does not approve of the bill, they must return it to the chamber in which it originated, along with their objections. The bill is then reconsidered, and if two-thirds of the House agree to pass it, it is sent to the other chamber for reconsideration. If two-thirds of the other chamber also approve, the bill becomes law, regardless of the president's veto.

If the president does not sign a bill within ten days of presentment while Congress is in session, the bill automatically becomes law. However, if Congress adjourns while the bill is awaiting the president's signature, and the president does not sign it within ten days of presentment, the bill does not become law. This is called a pocket veto.

Presidents can grant pardons

While a president cannot just change a past president's laws, they do have the power to grant pardons. This power is derived from Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution, which states that the President has the authority to "grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment". The pardon power is not limitless and is constrained by the rest of the Constitution, including the protection of constitutional rights and the duty to act in the public interest.

The Supreme Court has recognised the president's authority to pardon as broad, extending to every offence known to the law and able to be exercised at any time during the legal process. However, the Court has also clarified that the pardon power cannot be used to force an individual to accept a pardon that violates their constitutional rights, nor can it be used to exempt the president from criminal laws or license future lawbreaking.

The pardon power has been a source of controversy, with some arguing that it can be used to subvert other parts of the Constitution or to grant impunity to criminal violations. There are checks and balances in place to prevent the abuse of the pardon power, with Congress, the judiciary, and the executive branch each having tools to constrain it.

While the president has the power to grant pardons, it is important to note that this power is not without limits and must be exercised within the boundaries set by the Constitution and other branches of government.

Presidents can call out troops to protect the nation

The President of the United States has the power to call out troops to protect the nation. This is a power derived from Article II, Section 2, which names the President as the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. This power is quite broad in the context of limited military action and allows the President to direct the military at all times, regardless of whether there is a formal declaration of war.

The President can order US forces into military action if, in their judgment, the safety or strategic interests of the nation are threatened. They must inform Congress of these actions within 48 hours, and the troops cannot be committed for more than 60 days without Congressional approval.

There are several circumstances under which the President can deploy troops on domestic soil, as outlined by the Insurrection Act of 1807. Firstly, if there is a fear of action to overthrow a state, the President can send in troops at the request of the state legislature or, if the legislature cannot convene, at the request of the state's governor. Secondly, the President can deploy the military if there is a threat of federal law being broken. This has been invoked in the past when states refused to desegregate schools. Thirdly, the President can invoke the act if there is domestic violence that threatens the rights of any "part or class of the people," and the "constituted authorities of that state are unable, fail, or refuse to protect" rights, privileges, or immunity.

It is important to note that while the President has the power to call out troops to protect the nation, their ability to do so is limited by the War Powers Act, which was passed in 1973 to restrict a President's power to commit US troops to combat.

Presidents can appoint ambassadors

While a president cannot change the laws of a past president, they can appoint ambassadors. This power is derived from Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that the president shall nominate and, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint ambassadors, ministers, consuls, and other officers of the United States. This makes the president the Chief Diplomat of the United States, responsible for negotiating treaties, representing the country's interests abroad, and conducting public diplomacy.

The president's authority to appoint ambassadors is not limited by any act of Congress, except for the requirement of Senate confirmation. The Executive Branch has historically held this view, believing the president has the inherent authority to create diplomatic offices. This power has been exercised by various presidents, such as President Clinton, who appointed a special envoy to facilitate negotiations between rival paramilitary groups.

The duties of an ambassador include speaking on U.S. policy, advising the government on foreign policy, and coordinating American personnel within their jurisdiction. They serve as the highest-ranking representatives of the United States to other countries or international organizations. President Joe Biden, for example, appointed 217 ambassadors during his tenure.

The appointment of foreign diplomats differs from that of most domestic officers, as there is a lack of Supreme Court precedent on the matter. Instead, the historical practice of the political branches primarily informs the process. The president's ability to appoint ambassadors is subject to the constitutional conditions of the relationship with the Senate, reinforcing the collaborative nature of the role.

Frequently asked questions