Martial Law: Can A President Resign?

The US Constitution and founding documents do not mention martial law, and it is not clear whether the president can legally declare it. The Supreme Court has held that states can declare martial law, but it has never specifically held that the president can. While the president is the Commander-in-Chief of the US armed forces, and has extensive authority to deploy the military domestically, the Posse Comitatus Act prevents the US military from participating in civilian law enforcement activities. The Insurrection Act is the primary exception to this, allowing the president to deploy the military to enforce the law in specific situations.

The US President's authority to declare martial law

The US Constitution does not explicitly grant the President the power to declare martial law. However, there is a historical and ongoing debate about the extent of the President's authority to declare martial law.

Some scholars argue that the Constitution's enumerated war powers give both Congress and the President the ability to declare martial law. Articles I and II of the Constitution give each branch some control over America's military forces. The Commander-in-Chief clause establishes that the President is in charge of the army, navy, and state militias.

On the other hand, the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 prevents the US military from participating in civilian law enforcement activities, strengthening the separation of powers between Congress and the President. The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the President to deploy military forces to suppress rebellions and assist local law enforcement, which is considered the “primary exception” to the Posse Comitatus Act.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled that the President can declare martial law, and the legal precedent is sparse and inconsistent. The Court has implied that the federal government can declare it, but it is unclear if the President can act unilaterally or requires prior congressional authorization.

Despite the lack of clear authority, several Presidents throughout history have declared martial law.

Congress's power to impeach the President

While the sources do not directly address the scenario of a president leaving office during martial law, they do clarify the impeachment process, which could be used to remove a president from office.

The United States Constitution grants Congress the authority to impeach and remove the President from office. The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeachment, while the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments. The president, vice president, and all civil officers of the United States are subject to impeachment.

The impeachment process involves the House of Representatives charging an official of the federal government by approving articles of impeachment through a simple majority vote. The House then sends the articles of impeachment to the Senate, which sits as a High Court of Impeachment to consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. A committee of representatives, called "managers," acts as prosecutors before the Senate. In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides.

To convict, the Senate requires a two-thirds supermajority vote, resulting in the removal of the official from office. Additionally, the Senate may hold a separate vote to disqualify the official from holding any federal office in the future. It is important to note that impeachment proceedings are remedial rather than punitive, meaning that the convicted individual may still be subject to criminal or civil trial, prosecution, and conviction under the law. The president may not grant a pardon in an impeachment case but may do so in any resulting federal criminal case.

Martial law as a political tool

Martial law is a "dramatic departure from normal practice in the United States". It is a vague legal term for when military authorities take control of civil governance and law enforcement. During martial law, the executive or military leaders may suspend certain civil liberties. It is intended to be reserved for times of extreme emergencies when existing civilian government and law enforcement have ceased to function or become ineffective.

The Constitution of the United States does not define martial law and is silent as to who can impose it. However, the modern interpretation allows the president and state officials to declare "degrees of martial law in specific circumstances". The Supreme Court has held that states can declare martial law, but it has never specifically held that the president can. Therefore, it is unclear whether the president can legally declare martial law.

The Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878, prevents the United States military "from participating in civilian law enforcement activities". Its enactment strengthened the separation of powers between Congress and the president. The Insurrection Act of 1807, on the other hand, allows the president to deploy military forces to put down rebellions within the United States and deploy the military to help local law enforcement deal with domestic violence. The Insurrection Act is the "primary exception" to the Posse Comitatus Act.

Despite the ambiguity surrounding the president's authority to declare martial law, several presidents throughout history have done so. For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared martial law in Hawaii after the attack on Pearl Harbor, and President Abraham Lincoln invoked martial law during the Civil War, although in his case, it was Congressionally-imposed.

Given the lack of clarity and precedent regarding the president's authority to declare martial law, it could be easily abused as a political tool to control the population, especially political dissenters. Declaring martial law without cause could be considered an abuse of power, and Congress has the right to impeach a president in such cases.

Martial law and the suspension of civil liberties

Martial law is a "dramatic departure from normal practice in the United States". It refers to instances when a nation's armed forces step in and assume the governance of an area. Typically, the imposition of martial law accompanies curfews, the suspension of civil law, civil rights, habeas corpus, and the application or extension of military law or military justice to civilians.

In the United States, martial law has been used in a limited number of circumstances, such as in New Orleans during the Battle of New Orleans, after major disasters like the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, or during riots, such as the Omaha race riot of 1919. Local leaders declared martial law to protect themselves from mob violence, such as in Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War, or Utah during the Utah War.

The US Constitution does not define martial law and is silent as to who can impose it. However, the modern interpretation allows the president and state officials to declare "degrees of martial law in specific circumstances". The Posse Comitatus Act, enacted by Congress in 1878, prevents the US military "from participating in civilian law enforcement activities". Its enactment strengthened the separation of powers between Congress and the president. The Insurrection Act of 1807, on the other hand, allows the president to deploy military forces to put down rebellions within the United States and deploy the military to help local law enforcement deal with domestic violence.

Although the Supreme Court has held that states can declare martial law, it has never specifically held that the president can. Therefore, it is unclear whether the president can legally declare martial law. Despite this, several presidents throughout history have done so. Scholars argue that the Constitution's enumerated war powers of the legislative and executive branches give both Congress and the president the power to declare martial law. Articles I and II of the Constitution give each branch some control over America's military forces.

Martial law and the displacement of civilian authority

Martial law is a "dramatic departure from normal practice in the United States". It refers to instances when a nation's armed forces assume the governance of an area, typically during times of extreme emergency, when civilian government and law enforcement have ceased to function effectively. During martial law, the military commander is granted virtually unlimited authority to govern an area, including the power to suspend certain civil liberties and local judiciaries.

In the United States, the Constitution does not explicitly grant the President the power to declare martial law. While the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, and has extensive authority to deploy the military domestically, the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 prevents the military from participating in civilian law enforcement activities. The Insurrection Act of 1807 is an exception to this, allowing the President to deploy the military to enforce federal laws and maintain public order in cases of insurrection, rebellion, or domestic violence. However, the Act does not grant the President the power to declare martial law.

The Supreme Court has held that states can declare martial law, and state officials can declare "degrees of martial law in specific circumstances", but it has never specifically held that the President can. Congress might be able to authorize a presidential declaration of martial law, but this has not been conclusively decided. While the President has the power to call on the military in emergencies, such as natural disasters, this is not the same as declaring martial law, which involves the displacement of civilian authority.

Historically, several US Presidents have declared martial law, including Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, Franklin D. Roosevelt in Hawaii after the attack on Pearl Harbor, and Dwight D. Eisenhower to enforce desegregation in Arkansas in 1957. However, the lack of clear legal precedent and the potential for abuse of power as a political tool make the issue of martial law and the displacement of civilian authority a complex and controversial one.

Frequently asked questions