Product Alteration: When Does It Breach Copyright Law?

Copyright law is a complex area, and it can be challenging to determine whether a product has been altered enough to avoid breaking copyright law. The key consideration is whether the altered product is still similar enough to the original to be considered a copy. Even if the altered product does not use any of the same materials or exact expressions as the original, it may still infringe on the copyright if it is too similar in idea or concept. The purpose and character of the intended use of the altered product are also important factors in determining whether it infringes on the copyright. It is essential to seek legal advice and ensure permission from the copyright owner to avoid any potential infringement.

Copyright law and fair use

Copyright law protects intellectual property by giving creators control over how their work is used and distributed. However, this can sometimes stifle the very creativity that the law is designed to foster. This is where the concept of "fair use" comes in.

Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits the unlicensed use of copyrighted works in certain circumstances. It is an affirmative defence to a claim of copyright infringement, meaning that the burden of proof lies with the alleged infringer to demonstrate that their use was fair. There are four factors to be considered when evaluating whether a particular use is fair:

• Purpose and character of the use: Courts are more likely to find that non-profit educational and non-commercial uses are fair. However, this does not mean that all non-profit uses are fair, and courts will balance this factor against the others.
• Nature of the copyrighted work: Using a creative or imaginative work (e.g. a novel, movie, or song) is less likely to be considered fair use than using a factual work (e.g. a news item or technical article). Additionally, using an unpublished work is less likely to be considered fair.
• Amount and substantiality of the portion used: Courts will consider both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material that was used. There are no legal rules permitting the use of a specific number of words, musical notes, or percentage of a work.
• Harm to the potential market for the copyrighted work: Courts will consider whether the unlicensed use of the work could reasonably be expected to harm the market for the original work or markets under development. If there is no workable market for the original work, this will tend to favour the person claiming fair use.

It's important to note that the determination of fair use is highly fact-specific and dependent on the circumstances of each case. The Fair Use Index, compiled by the U.S. Copyright Office, can be a helpful resource for understanding how courts have applied the fair use doctrine in the past. However, it is not a substitute for legal advice, and if you have concerns about a particular use, it is best to consult an attorney.

Copying vs transforming

Copyright law is a complex area that attempts to balance the need to incentivize creators to produce new and useful works with the desire for society to benefit from the free flow of new ideas and information.

Copyright protection is limited in scope and duration, and it only applies to the form in which ideas and information are expressed, not the ideas and information themselves. This means that, in certain circumstances, it is possible to alter a product without breaking copyright law.

One such circumstance is when a product is transformed rather than copied. Copying involves reproducing a work without altering it, which would likely constitute copyright infringement. On the other hand, transforming involves making alterations to the original work, which could result in a new, derivative work that does not infringe on the original copyright. This concept is known as "fair use," which allows for limited use of copyrighted material without the creator's permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. For example, a teacher may show a movie in a classroom for educational purposes without obtaining permission from the copyright owner, provided that the copy of the movie being shown is lawfully obtained.

Another circumstance in which altering a product may not break copyright law is when the alterations are significant enough to constitute a new, original work. In this case, the altered product would be considered a derivative work, and the person making the alterations would be considered a secondary author. This new work would be subject to its own copyright protection, provided that it meets the requirements of copyrightability, such as being fixed in a tangible medium of expression.

It is important to note that the distinction between copying and transforming a product is not always clear-cut, and each case must be evaluated on its own merits. Additionally, the laws surrounding copyright and fair use may vary depending on the jurisdiction, so it is always advisable to seek legal counsel when dealing with copyright-related issues.

Ownership of photographs

Copyright law protects original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression, such as a computer file, paper, disk, tape, or recording. This protection is automatic and immediate upon the creation of the work, and it grants the creator control over how the work is used and the ability to make money from it. Copyrights can be sold or given to someone else, and they can be infringed if someone uses the work without authorization.

Photographers' works are protected by copyright from the moment the picture is taken. The photographer is generally the owner of the copyright, but there are exceptions. For example, if a photographer takes pictures as part of their employment, their employer may own the copyright. Similarly, if there is an agreement between the photographer and a commissioning party to create a work for a specific, statute-identified purpose, the commissioning party may own the copyright. In addition, the copyright may be transferred to another person if it is done in writing and signed by the copyright owner.

It is important to note that displaying copyright information on a photograph, such as a watermark or a copyright notice, can help protect the work by making it clear who owns the photo and who to contact for licensing or permission. This can also deter infringement and facilitate requests for permission to use the work. While registration with a copyright office is not required, it is recommended to create a public record of ownership and provide additional legal benefits, such as the ability to bring an infringement claim.

In the case of photographs, it can sometimes be difficult to determine who owns the copyright, and there may be little to no information about the owner on individual copies. This can lead to reluctance on the part of photocopying shops and photography stores to make reproductions of old photographs for fear of violating copyright law and being sued. To avoid this, consumers can purchase copyrighted works through authorized services, which can also help them avoid risks such as viruses and spyware.

To summarize, the ownership of photographs is generally held by the photographer, but there are exceptions, such as works made for hire or transfers of copyright ownership. Displaying copyright information and registering with a copyright office can help protect the work and facilitate licensing and permission requests.

Purchasing copyrighted works

Copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the exclusive legal right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time. Copyright law intends to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself. Copyright protection begins when an eligible work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression, such as being written on paper or recorded on film.

Copyrighted works can be purchased online through "authorized" services. These services allow consumers to purchase copyrighted works such as music, ebooks, or motion pictures. By purchasing copyrighted works through authorized services, consumers can avoid the risks associated with downloading material from peer-to-peer networks, such as infringement liability, viruses, unexpected material, or spyware.

When purchasing copyrighted works, it is important to ensure that the work is being sold or distributed by the copyright owner or an authorized representative. The ownership of copyrighted works can sometimes be difficult to determine, especially in the case of photographs or when multiple authors are involved. In the case of photographs, the owner of the copyright is generally the photographer or, in certain situations, the employer of the photographer. When multiple authors are involved, each author typically holds a set of rights to use or license the work.

If you are unsure about the ownership of a copyrighted work, you can contact the Copyright Office to conduct a search of its records or perform a search yourself. The Copyright Office will not provide copies of someone else's protected work without written authorization from the copyright owner or their agent, unless the work is involved in litigation. To avoid potential infringement, it is recommended to obtain permission from the copyright owner before using their work.

In certain situations, there are exceptions that allow for the use of copyrighted works without explicit permission from the owner. For example, under the fair use doctrine, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work, including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports. Additionally, displaying or performing a copyrighted movie in a nonprofit educational institution for instructional activities is generally exempt from infringement. However, it is important to note that these exemptions have specific limitations and conditions that must be met to qualify as fair use.

Teaching with copyrighted material

Copyright law is the mechanism by which society attempts to balance two conflicting goals. On the one hand, copyright encourages the creation of new and useful works by providing incentives to creators. On the other hand, society as a whole benefits from new ideas and information, so copyright protection is limited.

Copyright law protects the form in which ideas and information are expressed. Copyrights expire after a certain period, and certain limited uses of copyrighted material are allowed without the creator's permission. The most important such use is "fair use".

"Fair use" is a US legal doctrine that supports freedom of expression by allowing the unlicensed use of copyrighted works in certain circumstances. Examples of fair use include criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Educational fair use guidelines apply to material used by students or faculty of educational institutions for noncommercial teaching, studies, presentations, or research. There is a Classroom Use Exemption that states that, under certain circumstances, teachers and students have the right to display or perform any copyrighted works within qualifying Fair Use limitations. For example, it is permissible to play movies in the classroom, listen to music with students, read poems, and act out scenes from a play.

To determine whether a proposed use is a "fair use", four factors must be considered:

• Purpose: The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature, or for nonprofit educational purposes.
• Nature: The nature of the copyrighted work.
• Amount: The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.
• Effect: The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

Materials used in the classroom are generally limited to brief works or brief excerpts from longer works. For example, a single chapter from a book, an individual article from a journal, or individual news articles. The amount of the work used should be directly related to the educational objectives of the course. Instructors should also consider whether the material is reasonably available and affordable for students to purchase.

In the case of photographs, it can be difficult to determine who owns the copyright, and there may be little or no information about the owner on individual copies. The owner of the work is generally the photographer, or in certain situations, the employer of the photographer. Even if a person hires a photographer to take pictures, the photographer will own the copyright unless it is transferred in writing and signed by the copyright owner.

Frequently asked questions