State Vs Federal Law: Who Wins?

The relationship between state and federal law in the United States is complex. While federal law generally overrides state law, there are instances where states have chosen not to enforce it, such as with the legalisation of marijuana and gun laws. This is sometimes referred to as nullification or interposition, and has a long history in the US, with the theory being endorsed by the likes of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. In recent years, the Tea Party movement has fervently opposed the concentration of power in Washington, and the Supreme Court has had to intervene in cases where states have attempted to nullify federal law.

Marijuana laws

Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance, and it is illegal to transport it across state lines or fly with it. The federal government can regulate anything impacting interstate commerce, and marijuana's influence on prices in different states gives them jurisdiction. Despite this, 24 states, Washington D.C., and three territories have legalized marijuana through legislatures or referendums. The federal government selectively enforces its laws, and people are still prosecuted and imprisoned for marijuana possession under federal law.

State laws regarding marijuana vary widely. For example, in Virginia, adults 21 and older can possess up to one ounce of marijuana in public or private residences and grow up to four plants per household. However, it is illegal to sell or buy adult-use cannabis from pop-up shops or limited-time markets, and possession outside one's residence can result in legal consequences depending on the amount. Virginia also prohibits the use of cannabis while providing transportation services and the storage of open cannabis in the passenger area of a vehicle. Federal law prohibits flying with cannabis products containing more than 0.3% THC, and mailing or receiving them through the postal service.

The interplay between state and federal laws on marijuana creates a complex legal landscape. While states have some autonomy in legalizing marijuana, they must also navigate federal regulations and enforcement. The evolving nature of marijuana laws underscores the importance of staying informed about the regulations in each state to avoid misunderstandings or legal trouble.

Gun laws

In the United States, federal law overrides state law when the Federal government has jurisdiction, and in cases where the Constitution grants the Federal government power. Federal laws are established by Congress and enforced by federal agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Federal laws set the minimum standards for gun regulation, and states have the authority to implement their own gun regulations, which can either align with or exceed these standards. This has resulted in significant variations across different states.

The major differences between federal and state gun laws lie in who makes the law, who prosecutes someone who violates the law, and what the penalty is for breaking the law. For example, federal law mandates background checks for all firearm purchases from licensed dealers and prohibits specific categories of people, such as convicted felons and individuals with restraining orders, from purchasing or possessing firearms. This prohibition is often permanent, though some states offer pathways to restore gun rights under certain conditions.

State gun laws can differ significantly, making it challenging for gun owners to understand their rights and responsibilities, especially when travelling or moving between states. Some states enforce strict regulations to reduce gun violence, while others focus on protecting individual freedoms. For example, some states require permits for concealed carry, while others allow "constitutional carry" without a permit. Waiting periods for gun purchases also vary, with states like California mandating them and states like Texas not requiring them.

Violating gun laws can have profound and long-term implications for individuals, including the loss of the right to own or carry firearms, impacts on employment opportunities, housing, and the ability to obtain specific licenses. It may also affect immigration status and eligibility for public benefits. Fines and imprisonment are common consequences for gun law violations, with penalties varying depending on the state and the severity of the offense.

Health care laws

In the United States, federal law overrides state law when the Constitution grants the relevant power to the federal government. However, states can choose not to enforce a federal law, and some have passed laws that contradict federal law. This dynamic between federal and state laws also applies to health care laws.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federal law that establishes national standards for the protection and administration of individuals' health information, such as medical records and personal health information. The HIPAA Privacy Rule gives patients a variety of rights and protects their personal health information. The Information Practices Act (IPA) is a state law in California that expands on the constitutional guarantee of privacy by providing limits on the collection, management, and disclosure of personal information by state agencies.

State laws also govern the use and disclosure of health information. For example, in California, patients can request to receive their laboratory test results from healthcare providers in written or oral form. Consent must be obtained to deliver results via electronic means, and certain tests, such as HIV antibody tests and drug abuse tests, may not be conveyed by electronic means unless specific requirements are met. Additionally, test results and health information cannot be used for commercial purposes without patient consent.

California also has state laws that protect the privacy of individuals' medical information. The Disclosure of Medical Information law limits disclosures by healthcare providers, health plans, and contractors, while the Civil Penalties for Unauthorized Access, Use, or Disclosure of Medical Information law imposes administrative fines or civil penalties on licensed healthcare professionals who knowingly obtain, disclose, or use medical information in violation of the law.

Federal laws can also impact the health care system, as seen with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, which aimed to increase access, promote quality, and improve efficiency in the patient care effort. The ACA mandated expanding federal and state-funded Medicaid programs to insure a larger population of at-risk citizens, which some states challenged, arguing that the federal government could not coerce them into expanding Medicaid eligibility thresholds to receive federal matching funds.

Commerce laws

In the United States, the federal government has the power to make laws that override state laws, but only in areas where it has jurisdiction. The Constitution must grant the federal government the relevant power, and it cannot make laws about everything. One way the federal government can exert its power over state laws is through the Commerce Clause, which gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce and restrict states from impairing it. This clause has been interpreted broadly by the courts, allowing Congress to justify exercising legislative power over the activities of states and their citizens. For instance, in Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court upheld federal regulation of intrastate marijuana production, even though it had been legalized in many states.

However, the Commerce Clause does not mean that other economic activities are free from government regulation. Instead, it gives each of the fifty states the power to regulate all intrastate economic activities. This decentralization of law-making power at the state level enables a diversity of approaches to develop, reflecting the widespread disagreement about economic and social policies.

The Dormant Commerce Clause is an implicit prohibition in the Commerce Clause that prevents states from passing legislation that discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce. This is particularly important in preventing protectionist state policies that favour state citizens or businesses over non-citizens conducting business within the state. For example, in West Lynn Creamery Inc. v. Healy, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts state tax on milk products because it impeded interstate commercial activity by discriminating against non-Massachusetts citizens and businesses.

While the federal government can override state laws in certain areas, states can also choose not to enforce a federal law. For example, some states have legalized marijuana use, even though it remains illegal under federal law. In practice, the federal government may selectively arrest and prosecute some people under that law, and it may also use other tactics to exert its power, such as withholding federal funds if a state defies federal guidance.

State sovereignty

The concept of federalism in the United States is based on dual sovereignty, a system of shared authority between federal and state governments, with each sovereign checking the other. The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution reserves for the states or the people all powers not granted to the national government. The lines of authority between states and the federal government are defined by the US Constitution and relevant case law.

The federal government has incidental powers to pass national laws necessary to support their specifically granted powers. For example, the federal government can regulate anything that impacts commerce that crosses state lines. If a state defies federal guidance, the federal government can play hardball to get its way, such as by withholding federal highway funds.

In some cases, states have chosen not to enforce a federal law, passing laws that legalise conduct which is contrary to federal law. For example, the use of marijuana has been legalised in 24 states, DC, and 3 territories, despite being illegal under federal law.

Frequently asked questions