Suing To Declare Laws Unconstitutional: Can States Do That?

In the United States, individuals can challenge the enforcement of state policies by suing state officials for acting under an allegedly unconstitutional statute. This is a common method for testing the validity of state legislation in federal courts. Persons may bring suits to have a law declared unconstitutional if they can establish standing by showing there is an actual dispute. If a state law is found to be unconstitutional, plaintiffs may ask for an injunction prohibiting the state from enforcing the law. Suits against state officials can also be brought for violations of constitutional rights, such as the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure.

Suing state officials

In the case of Ex parte Young, the doctrine of sovereign immunity was invoked, establishing that a suit against an official is not a suit against the government. This doctrine is essential as it allows courts to provide relief against government wrongdoings. In this case, the state attorney general was sued to prevent him from enforcing a law that reduced railroad rates and imposed penalties for non-compliance. The plaintiffs, railroad stockholders, argued that the law was unconstitutional and that they would suffer irreparable harm if it were enforced. The court ruled in their favour, granting an injunction against the state attorney general.

Suits against state officials can also be used to enforce constitutional rights. For example, individuals can sue police officers for violating their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable seizure if they were subjected to excessive force during an arrest. In such cases, it is preferable to sue the city, as it is more likely to have the financial means to pay a substantial damage award. However, a city is generally not held responsible for the constitutional violations of its employees unless they were acting in accordance with government policies.

In some cases, unconstitutional government actions may affect a large number of people. For instance, if a state operates an overcrowded and unsafe prison system, this may violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on "cruel and unusual punishment." In such situations, a small group of affected individuals may file a class-action lawsuit against the government on behalf of all "similarly situated" persons.

Suing for damages

It is important to note that individuals cannot simply choose a law they believe to be unconstitutional and file a lawsuit. They must first establish standing by demonstrating an actual dispute. This means they need to show that they are likely to violate the law and be prosecuted for it. If they are able to establish standing, they can bring a declaratory judgment suit to have the law declared unconstitutional.

In the context of suing for damages, individuals can seek compensation from the governmental body or public official responsible for the violation of their constitutional rights. For example, if members of the Ku Klux Klan were arrested or prevented from marching due to an unconstitutional statute, they could bring a suit for damages against the city. This is because the arrests were authorized by the mayor and thus constituted city policy.

It is worth noting that while damages may be recovered against a city for enforcing an unconstitutional law or policy, the same does not apply to state governments. Additionally, individuals can also bring suits against state officers to prevent them from executing a state law that conflicts with the Constitution. However, if the act of the state officer does not constitute an individual wrong and is something that only a state can do, the suit may be barred as it is considered a suit against the state.

To determine the best course of action, individuals should consult with a lawyer to understand their options and protect their rights effectively.

Suing the state vs. suing state officials

Suing the state and suing state officials are two different legal concepts with distinct implications and outcomes.

Suing the State

Sovereign immunity, derived from the Eleventh Amendment, generally protects states from being sued without their consent. This immunity extends to statewide agencies, which are considered an extension of the state. However, it is important to note that counties and municipalities are not covered by sovereign immunity and can be sued for debts or other violations.

Suing State Officials

Suing state officials, on the other hand, is a recognized legal strategy to challenge the implementation of potentially unconstitutional state laws or policies. This approach is based on the "stripping doctrine," which allows state officials to be sued in their individual capacity if they use their position to act illegally or unconstitutionally. By suing state officials, claimants can seek injunctions to prevent the enforcement of unconstitutional laws, as seen in the Ex parte Young case.

Additionally, suits against state officials can be used to restrain them from taking actions that contradict federal statutes or to compel them to fulfill obligations imposed by the Constitution or federal laws. These suits do not constitute a direct attack on the state's sovereignty, as they focus on the actions of individual officials rather than the state itself.

In conclusion, while suing the state directly may be challenging due to sovereign immunity, suing state officials is a viable option for individuals seeking to challenge unconstitutional laws or protect their rights. This distinction is crucial in shaping legal strategies and ensuring access to justice.

State laws vs. federal laws

State laws and federal laws are both integral parts of the United States' legal system. However, they differ in their scope and applicability, and sometimes come into conflict with each other.

State laws are laws that are enacted and enforced by the individual states of the US. Each state has its own unique set of laws that cover a wide range of issues, including criminal law, family law, property law, and contract law. These laws are created by the state's legislature and apply only within the borders of that particular state. On the other hand, federal laws are laws that are enacted by the US Congress and apply uniformly across the entire country. They cover areas such as intellectual property, immigration, bankruptcy, and federal crimes.

At times, state laws and federal laws can clash with each other. When this happens, the US Constitution, which outlines the powers of both the federal government and the states, dictates which law takes precedence. The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution establishes that the federal law is "the supreme law of the land," meaning that it takes precedence over any conflicting state laws. This ensures that the laws of the country as a whole are consistent and uniform.

However, the complex relationship between state and federal laws can sometimes lead to legal challenges. For example, individuals or entities can bring a lawsuit against state laws if they believe their constitutional rights have been violated. This is known as a declaratory judgment suit, and it allows a person to ask a court to review a state law and determine if it is unconstitutional. If the law is found to be unconstitutional, individuals can also seek an injunction to prevent the state from enforcing it. These suits are often brought in federal court, as individuals may believe a federal judge is more likely to declare a state law unconstitutional than a state judge.

Additionally, state laws can be challenged as unconstitutional if they conflict with federal laws. In such cases, the doctrine of preemption comes into play, where a federal law takes precedence over a state law on the same subject. This ensures that the federal government can effectively carry out its constitutional responsibilities and that state laws do not hinder the implementation of federal policies.

Suing for declaratory judgement

A declaratory judgement suit can be filed in either federal or state court. However, it is usually brought in federal court, as a federal judge may be more willing to declare a state law unconstitutional. To bring a suit, a person must establish standing by showing an actual dispute. They must demonstrate that they are likely to violate the law and be prosecuted for it.

If a person is arrested or prevented from exercising their rights due to an unconstitutional statute, they can sue for damages. This can be done under 28 U.S.C.§ 1983, which allows a person whose constitutional rights have been violated to sue the responsible public official or governmental body for monetary damages. For example, if the police use excessive force, causing physical injury, individuals may be able to sue the police officers individually for violating their Fourth Amendment rights.

Suits against state officials are a common device to test the validity of state legislation in federal courts before enforcement and interpretation in state courts. These suits can also be used to restrain state officials from taking actions that contravene federal statutes or to compel them to undertake affirmative obligations imposed by the Constitution or federal laws.

Frequently asked questions