Union Contracts: State Law Override?

The relationship between unions and state law is complex and multifaceted. Unions and employers are required to adhere to federal and state laws and court rulings, but collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) between unions and employers may supersede certain laws in limited situations. For example, a CBA may define overtime differently from state law, but it cannot override state-mandated rest periods. The dynamic between unions and state law is further complicated by the constant evolution of regulations and laws, particularly in sectors such as public education. Ultimately, the interplay between union contracts and state law is a delicate balance that requires careful negotiation and adherence to federal and state regulations.

Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) may supersede overtime labour laws

In the United States, labor laws are governed by federal and state statutes, with federal laws setting forth minimum requirements and state laws providing greater rights or protections. While collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) are contracts between a union and an employer, they may supersede overtime labor laws, but only in very limited situations.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) governs wage and hour laws in the United States and is generally applicable to all businesses, with rare exceptions. Under the FLSA, companies must pay hourly, non-exempt workers overtime pay equal to one and a half times their normal wages if they work more than 40 hours in a workweek.

A CBA may provide for a different rate in limited situations. For example, a CBA may define "overtime" as working more than 35 hours per week. In such a case, an employee who works 36 hours would be entitled to the overtime wage listed in the CBA. However, this overtime rate does not have to be one and a half times the employee's regular wage, as that rate only applies for work performed beyond 40 hours. The rate in the CBA could be lower or higher.

It is important to note that even if a CBA provides for a different rate, the business must still comply with overtime labor laws for hours worked in excess of 40 in one week. This means that despite any provisions in the CBA, the business must pay overtime according to the applicable labor laws for any hours worked beyond the standard 40-hour workweek.

While CBAs may supersede certain overtime labor laws in limited circumstances, they cannot override all state laws. For example, in a case involving Yellow Freight and its union workers represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, a company's collective bargaining agreement was found to supersede the state's requirement for rest periods by the King County Superior Court Judge Richard Jones in 1999. However, this ruling was later overturned by the state Court of Appeals, which stated that labor contracts could not supersede state-mandated rest periods.

CBAs may provide for a different rate than state law

Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) are contracts between a union and an employer. They are designed to ensure that employees are paid a fair wage and work in a safe environment. CBAs may supersede overtime labour laws, but only in very limited situations.

In the case of overtime, a CBA may define "overtime" differently from state law. For example, it may define "overtime" as working more than 35 hours per week, as opposed to the standard 40 hours. In such a case, the CBA may provide for a lower rate of pay than state law, as long as the business still pays overtime according to the law for hours worked in excess of 40 in one week. The CBA may also provide for a higher rate of pay.

It is important to note that a CBA cannot give an employer the right to reduce safety standards or take any other action that would violate OSHA regulations or any state or federal employment law. For example, in a 1999 case, a company claimed that the state's requirement for rest periods was superseded by its CBA with its union workers. While a lower court agreed, this ruling was later overturned by the state Court of Appeals, which stated that labour contracts cannot override state-mandated rest periods.

In summary, while CBAs may provide for a different rate of pay than state law in certain limited situations, they cannot override state law in a way that would reduce safety standards or violate other state or federal employment regulations.

Unions must tell employees about the option to be a 'core' member

Unions are obligated to inform all covered employees that they have the option to be a 'core' member, also known as an 'objector'. An objector is no longer a full member of the union but is still protected by the union contract. This option was created by a Supreme Court ruling and is known as the Beck right.

An employee may object to union membership on religious grounds, but in that case, they must pay an amount equal to union dues to a non-religious charitable organisation. Employees who object to full union membership can continue as core members and pay only that share of dues used directly for representation, such as collective bargaining and contract administration.

It is important to note that in 27 states, union-security agreements have been banned through the passing of "right to work" laws. In these states, it is up to each employee to decide whether or not to join the union and pay dues, even though all workers are protected by the collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the union.

Unions must also inform employees about the procedures for filing objections. If the union does not provide these procedures, employees can bring a lawsuit in federal court for breach of the union's duty of fair representation or file an unfair labour practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Additionally, private sector employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) have the right to seek a "deauthorisation" election, which nullifies the compulsory unionism clause in the collective bargaining contract and eliminates all dues requirements.

State-mandated rest periods cannot be superseded by labour contracts

In the United States, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) governs wage and hour laws. The FLSA is a federal statute that applies to all businesses, with rare exceptions. Under the FLSA, companies must pay hourly, non-exempt workers overtime pay equal to one and a half times the worker's normal wages if they work more than 40 hours in a workweek.

A Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) is a contract between a union and an employer. The CBA aims to ensure that employees are paid a fair wage and work in a safe environment. While a CBA may supersede overtime labor laws in very limited situations, it cannot override state-mandated rest periods.

In the case of Yellow Freight, the company argued that the state's requirement for rest periods was superseded by its collective bargaining agreement with its union workers, represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. The King County Superior Court Judge Richard Jones agreed with the company and dismissed the workers' complaint. However, this ruling was later overturned by the state Court of Appeals, which stated that labor contracts cannot do away with state-mandated rest periods. The majority of Supreme Court justices agreed, emphasizing the importance of healthy working conditions and adequate wages for employees.

The concept of rest periods is also recognized in other countries' labor laws, such as the Philippines. The Labor Code of the Philippines and the implementing rules of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) mandate that employees are entitled to adequate time away from work to maintain their health, safety, efficiency, and overall well-being. These minimum standards imposed by law cannot be diminished by any contract or company policy. Similarly, Articles 91 to 93 of the Philippine Labor Code mandate that every employee is entitled to at least one rest day after every six consecutive working days. This rest day must consist of at least 24 consecutive hours free from all duties and responsibilities.

The Rodda Act requires school boards and unions to review existing agreements every three years

In general, union contracts cannot override state law. However, in certain limited situations, a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) may supersede specific laws, such as those relating to overtime pay. In such cases, the CBA may define "overtime" differently, but the business must still adhere to state-mandated rest periods.

The Rodda Act, passed in California in 1975, is an example of legislation that recognises the importance of collective bargaining in the context of teachers' contracts. The Act requires school boards and unions to review the terms of their existing agreements at least once every three years. This process of negotiation determines salaries and benefits, hours, calendars, and other aspects of teachers' working conditions. It also provides an opportunity to address new issues or problems that have arisen during the contract period, such as changes to school finance or teacher training and evaluation.

The "sunshine" clause of the Rodda Act adds a layer of transparency to the negotiation process by requiring that each party's initial bargaining proposal be presented for public comment at a school board meeting. This allows for community input and helps to ensure that the negotiations are conducted in good faith.

To facilitate the resolution of disputes, the Rodda Act established the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), a state-level adjudicating body. PERB interprets collective bargaining issues, handles questions, appoints fact-finders, and maintains a public file of all signed agreements for public schools. While PERB's rulings are final, either party can challenge them in court if they remain dissatisfied.

In summary, the Rodda Act's requirement for regular review of agreements between school boards and unions helps to ensure that teachers' contracts remain up-to-date and relevant to the evolving educational landscape. The Act also promotes transparency and provides a structured framework for resolving conflicts, ultimately contributing to a more harmonious relationship between school boards, unions, and the wider community.

Frequently asked questions