Marrying A Deceased Sibling's Spouse: Is It Legal?

The concept of a widow marrying her brother-in-law is known as a levirate marriage, derived from the Latin word levir, meaning husband's brother. This practice was common in ancient times, particularly if the deceased man had no children, as it allowed for the continuation of his family line and preservation of his inheritance. While it has fallen out of favor in modern times and was illegal in some places in the past, it is still observed in certain parts of the world, such as among specific tribes in Africa and in the past, among the Huns and Hungarians.

Levirate marriage

In ancient times, if a man died without a child, it was common for his unmarried brother to marry the widow to provide an heir for the deceased. The first son produced in that union was considered the legal descendant of her dead husband. This practice served to protect the widow and her children, ensuring that they had a male provider and protector. It also ensured the continuation of the family line and the preservation of inheritance within a tribe.

Historical context

The practice of a widow marrying her brother-in-law, known as levirate marriage, has a long history in various cultures and religions. The word "levirate" comes from the Latin word "levir," meaning "a husband's brother." This type of marriage was particularly common in ancient times, especially among the ancient Israelites and in the Bible. For example, in the book of Genesis, Judah instructs his son Onan to "sleep with" and "fulfill your duty to" his brother's widow, Tamar, to "raise up offspring" for his brother. Another example is found in the book of Ruth, where Ruth, a widow without children, marries Boaz, a relative of her late husband, to preserve her late husband's land. Levirate marriage is also referenced in Matthew 22, where Jesus is confronted by the Sadducees with a question based on the Law's requirement of levirate marriage.

In addition to its biblical roots, levirate marriage has been practised by various ethnic and cultural groups throughout history. For example, it was observed by the people ruled by the Inca in Peru in the early 16th century, as described by Spanish chronicler Juan de Betanzos. The practice was also prevalent among certain African societies, particularly in Nigeria, Zambia, South Sudan, Uganda, Malawi, and Kenya. In these societies, widow inheritance or "bride inheritance" was customary, with the widow expected to marry her late husband's brother or another male relative to continue the family line and preserve the inheritance. This practice was especially prominent among certain tribes, such as the Yoruba, the Igbo, the Hausa-Fulani, the Bagwere, the Sena, the Luo, and the Maragoli.

In India, the tradition of a widow marrying her brother-in-law, though not universally practised, also has roots in ancient customs and traditions. It is considered a way to provide support and care for the widow and maintain family ties. While there are no legal restrictions on this practice in India, societal norms and historical practices prohibit a man from marrying the sister of his deceased wife. The social acceptance of a widow marrying her brother-in-law varies across different regions and communities in India, with some communities embracing it as a common practice and others associating a social stigma with it.

In Western history, there is some evidence of levirate marriage occurring in the 19th century, specifically in 1851, as indicated by marriage records. However, it is unclear whether this practice was legal at the time, with conflicting information suggesting that it may have been illegal but frequently ignored.

Religious context

In the Christian religion, the practice of a widow marrying her brother-in-law is known as a levirate marriage. This custom is mentioned in the Bible, in Deuteronomy 25:5-6, where God commands the Israelites to follow this practice to provide for the surviving widow and to continue the family legacy. However, some Christians interpret this verse as a general rule, with Leviticus providing an exception. According to this interpretation, a widow may not marry her husband's brother but may marry another kinsman.

In Judaism, levirate marriage has fallen out of favour and is considered an extinct practice today. In ancient times, it was practised to continue the family line and preserve one's divinely appointed inheritance. The Torah, or Jewish law, specifies that if a man dies without children, his brother should marry his widow to provide for her and carry on the family name. However, if the deceased man had children, his brother was forbidden from marrying the widow.

In Islam, there is no restriction on a widow marrying her brother-in-law, and it is considered permissible. The Quran states that a widow is free to marry anyone she chooses or even remain unmarried after the death of her husband. While pre-Islamic custom may have allowed the deceased man's relatives to inherit his wife, the Quran forbids this practice, giving women the freedom to choose their own spouses.

In Hinduism, the rules around widow remarriage can be complex and vary depending on regional customs, religious beliefs, and family traditions. While some families may view a widow marrying her brother-in-law as taboo, others may be more open to the idea. The Indian government has worked to make widow remarriage more accessible and acceptable, with the Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act of 1856 allowing widows to remarry regardless of caste or religion.

Social implications

In India, the social implications of a widow marrying her brother-in-law can vary depending on regional customs, religious beliefs, and family traditions. While some families may be open to the idea, others may consider it taboo. This practice is not universal in India but occurs in certain regions and communities.

The Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act of 1856, a landmark law, allowed widows to remarry regardless of caste or religion. This law challenged traditional patriarchal norms that often left widows destitute and marginalized, empowering women in Indian society. However, despite this legal framework, social acceptance of widow remarriage varies across India, with some communities still considering it taboo.

The social implications of widow remarriage to a brother-in-law are complex. On the one hand, it can provide a sense of continuity for the widow within her late husband's family, maintaining familial bonds and support structures. It can also help preserve the widow's social status and ensure her financial security, especially if she has children.

However, concerns about inheritance and social status may arise, impacting family dynamics and relationships. Families may object to such marriages due to these concerns or because they view it as a form of incest, which is culturally taboo in India. These objections can cause tensions and even result in ostracism or rejection from the family and the wider community.

Furthermore, the social implications can also extend beyond the immediate family. In communities where widow remarriage is accepted, it can foster a sense of inclusion and empower women to exercise their legal right to remarry. Conversely, in communities where it is not accepted, the widow and her potential brother-in-law spouse may face social stigma, isolation, or even discrimination.

Overall, while Indian law permits widow remarriage, including to a brother-in-law, the social implications can be multifaceted and vary significantly depending on regional and community norms, as well as family dynamics and individual circumstances.

Legal status

In India, the legal status of a widow marrying her brother-in-law is complex and depends on various factors, including regional customs, religious beliefs, and family traditions. While there is no specific tradition allowing this type of marriage, it is not uncommon and is sometimes permitted.

The Indian government has made efforts to improve the accessibility and acceptability of widow remarriage. The Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act of 1856 was a significant step in this direction, allowing widows to remarry regardless of caste or religion. This Act challenged traditional patriarchal norms that often left widows marginalised and destitute, marking a notable advancement for women's rights in India.

Under the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, widows are permitted to remarry, and there are no legal restrictions on them marrying their brother-in-law. This is because, in Hindu custom, the brother-in-law is considered a "sapinda" or blood relative, and as such, he is allowed to marry his sister-in-law after her husband's death.

However, it is important to note that the cultural taboo against marrying within the same family still exists in India. Some families may object to the idea of a widow marrying her brother-in-law due to concerns about inheritance or social status. Additionally, while widow remarriage is becoming more legally acceptable, there may still be exceptions and limitations based on specific circumstances, regional laws, and customs.

In summary, while there are no explicit legal prohibitions against a widow marrying her brother-in-law in India, the decision is influenced by a range of factors, including cultural norms, family dynamics, and regional variations in laws and customs.

Frequently asked questions