Contractual Power: State Laws Vs Written Agreements

The concept of a contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that outlines the rights and duties governing their arrangement. While contracts can be created through oral or written agreements, they are generally enforceable as long as they meet legal requirements, including offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual intent. However, the question of whether a written agreement can overrule state laws is complex. In general, a private agreement cannot supersede the power of government, and courts will enforce statutes over conflicting contracts. Nonetheless, certain statutes, such as the Federal Arbitration Act in the US, allow contracts to take precedence in specific situations. Additionally, the selection of governing law in a contract can influence jurisdiction and dispute resolution, but it is essential to consider state-specific regulations and consult a lawyer to ensure the validity of a written agreement.

Handwritten contracts are generally enforceable if they meet legal requirements

To be enforceable, handwritten contracts must meet state-specific requirements. Certain contracts, such as those for real estate or long-term leases, must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. Each state has its own version of this statute, but typically, contracts for goods over a certain amount must be in writing. For example, California enforces handwritten contracts without notarization if both parties reside in the state, while New York requires written agreements for real estate transactions.

To strengthen the enforceability of a handwritten contract, it should be drafted clearly and legibly, with all terms explicitly defined. Obtaining notarization can also enhance enforceability, although it is not required for validity. Additionally, including full names, dates, obligations, and signatures in the contract can help avoid disputes. Witnesses and additional documentation, such as emails or receipts, can further support a handwritten agreement in court.

It is important to note that not all contracts are enforceable. Agreements involving illegal activities, lack of consideration, or duress will not be upheld in court. Handwritten amendments to existing contracts can be valid but should follow proper procedures to avoid invalidation. Before entering into a handwritten contract, it is advisable to consult a lawyer to ensure its validity and understand the specific regulations in your state.

A choice of law provision in a contract allows parties to agree that a particular state's laws will be used

A choice-of-law clause, also known as a "governing law" provision in a contract, allows the involved parties to agree that a particular state's laws will be used to interpret the agreement, even if they reside in or the agreement is signed in a different state. For instance, several large corporations opt for Delaware law in their contracts' choice-of-law provisions because the state's laws often favour corporations and offer predictability in disputes. Similarly, a potato farmer in Michigan entering into a contract with a grocery chain might request that any disputes be resolved under Idaho law, even if neither party has ties to the state.

The selection of the state for jurisdiction is typically more important than the choice of which state's law will be used for governing the contract, as the former dictates where disputes will be resolved. For example, a contract may require that lawsuits be filed in California but decided under New York law. The choice-of-law clause is usually concise and straightforward, often stating something like, "This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts."

It is important to note that a choice-of-law clause may encounter challenges if included in an insurance contract, as certain states aim to enforce their consumer protection laws related to insurance within their borders. For instance, Massachusetts prohibits choice-of-law provisions in insurance contracts. Additionally, contracts overseeing corporate behaviour generally must adhere to the law of the state of incorporation.

When drafting a choice-of-law provision, attorneys should consider the potential for extra-contractual claims and whether a narrow or all-encompassing provision is preferable. A broad provision may provide more flexibility in arguing for the application of a different law to extra-contractual claims. Furthermore, the inclusion of a jury waiver in the agreement should contemplate the possibility of litigation in specific states, such as California, which has unique considerations regarding jury waivers.

Contract modifications are allowed if all parties agree and legal procedures are followed

Contract modifications are generally allowed as long as all parties agree and the necessary legal procedures are followed. A contract is defined as a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that outlines the rights and duties governing their arrangement. Contracts can be formed through oral or written agreements, and they can usually be modified at a later date. For instance, an employee who signs an employment contract with a company may later sign a modified version of that contract if they get promoted, with the new contract reflecting their new job title and salary.

However, it's important to note that contract modifications must adhere to legal procedures and requirements to be valid. The majority of contract laws can be found in state statutes, and there are specific laws that should be reviewed before making any changes, such as the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Statute of Frauds (SOF), and common law contract principles. These laws have been adopted and interpreted differently by various states, so it's crucial to understand the specific state laws that apply to the contract.

While parties to a contract generally have the freedom to agree on their own terms, a contract cannot require a breach of the law. Any contract that includes illegal activities or violates mandatory state laws will be considered invalid and unenforceable. For example, a contract that purports to pay an employee less than the minimum wage mandated by state law is not legally enforceable.

To ensure that contract modifications are valid, it is advisable to consult a local contract lawyer. They can guide you through the applicable modification guidelines, help draft and review changes, and negotiate new terms. Additionally, if the modifications are substantial, a new contract may need to be drafted, and a lawyer can assist with this process as well.

The Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing to be considered enforceable

In general, a private agreement cannot supersede the power of government. For example, if a contract attempts to pay an employee less than the minimum wage, it is not a valid contract. However, certain statutes explicitly or implicitly allow contracts to override them in some situations. For instance, the Federal Arbitration Act in the US allows arbitration contracts to take effect even if state laws forbid them.

The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain types of contracts to be written to be enforceable. It was created to reduce the likelihood of fraudulent conduct and protect both parties in a contract. The types of contracts that typically fall under the Statute of Frauds include:

• Contracts for the sale of an interest in land: These contracts must be written down, unless an oral contract has been partially performed, in which case the seller can recover the purchase price from the buyer.
• Contracts that cannot be completed in less than a year: Oral contracts that cannot be fulfilled within a year are enforceable if they have been fully performed.
• Promises to pay another person's debt: A promise made by a third person to a creditor to be responsible for the debt of the debtor must be in writing.
• Contracts for the sale of goods above a specific dollar amount: In the US, this amount is typically $500, and the contract must be in writing to be enforceable.
• Contracts for the sale of personal property: In California, these contracts are not enforceable beyond $5,000 in value unless there is a written agreement.
• Contracts made in consideration of marriage: These include any promises made in connection with marriage, such as engagement gifts.

It is important to note that the Statute of Frauds may vary depending on the state or territory, so it is advisable to research the specific provisions in your jurisdiction and seek legal advice as needed.

Contracts involving corporate behaviour must be decided by the law of the state of incorporation

In general, a written agreement cannot override state laws. Statute law, case law, and administrative law all fall under the purview of the government, and a private agreement cannot supersede its power. For instance, if employees are entitled to minimum wages, a contract that intends to pay less than that minimum is invalid. However, certain statutes allow contracts to supersede them in specific situations. The Federal Arbitration Act in the US, for instance, allows arbitration contracts to be enforced even if state laws forbid them.

Now, coming to contracts involving corporate behaviour, they are usually decided by the law of the state of incorporation. This is known as a "choice of law" or "governing law" provision in a contract, which allows parties to agree that a particular state's laws will be used to interpret the agreement, regardless of the state in which they live or the contract is signed. For example, many large corporations choose Delaware law in their contracts because of its business-friendly legislation.

The choice of state law is usually not a significant negotiating issue since the differences in state laws are often negligible. However, the choice of jurisdiction can be more important. Jurisdiction refers to the location where a dispute will be resolved, and it determines where everyone involved in the dispute will have to go to resolve it. For example, a contract may require lawsuits to be filed in California but decided under New York law.

To summarise, while a written agreement typically cannot overrule state laws, contracts governing corporate behaviour are subject to the law of the state of incorporation, and the choice of state law is generally not a major point of contention.

Frequently asked questions