Executive Orders: Overriding Laws Or Subordinate To Them?

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively and are often controversial, as they are perceived to bypass the congressional approval process. While executive orders cannot generate new laws, they can provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented and are considered binding instructions for federal agencies and officials. They are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they are not supported by statute or the Constitution. This raises the question: Can an executive order supersede a law?

Executive orders are subject to judicial review

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively and are published in the Federal Register, the official journal of the federal government. While they are not explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution, executive orders derive their authority from Article II, Section 1, which states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."

For example, in 1952, the Supreme Court ruled against President Harry Truman's Executive Order 10340, which placed all the country's steel mills under federal control. The Court found that this order attempted to create new law rather than clarify or further an existing law established by Congress or the Constitution. Similarly, in 1935, the Supreme Court overturned five of President Franklin Roosevelt's executive orders.

Executive orders can also be challenged through legal action. For instance, in response to an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in 2017, the state of Washington filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, arguing that the order unconstitutionally stranded residents abroad, separated families, restricted travel, and negatively impacted the state's economy and public universities. In another instance, Executive Order 13233, issued by President George W. Bush in 2001, was criticised by the Society of American Archivists for violating existing laws regarding access to presidential papers. This order was later revoked by President Barack Obama in 2009.

While executive orders cannot create new laws, they provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented and carry weight as binding instructions to federal agencies and officials within the executive branch's authority. They are often used to clarify or further existing laws and are subject to judicial review to ensure they do not exceed the President's constitutional powers.

Executive orders can be overturned by Congress

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. While they are not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, they are generally viewed as being granted authority by Section 1 of Article II, which states that "The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America".

Despite this, executive orders can be overturned by Congress. This is because executive orders must comply with the Constitution and other laws passed by Congress. If an executive order lacks support from statute or the Constitution, it may be overturned by the courts or superseded by legislation. For example, in 1952, President Harry Truman's Executive Order 10340, which placed all the country's steel mills under federal control, was found to be invalid because it attempted to make law rather than clarify or further a law put forth by Congress or the Constitution.

Congress can also override an executive order by writing legislation that renders it moot, although this would require presidential approval like all laws. In practice, this means that a two-thirds majority in each chamber of Congress is necessary to overturn an executive order, as it could otherwise be blocked by a presidential veto.

Executive orders can also be changed or revoked by subsequent executive orders, either by the same president or the next one. For example, in 2009, President Barack Obama revoked Executive Order 13233, which had been issued by President George W. Bush in 2001 and restricted public access to the papers of former presidents.

While executive orders can provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented and are binding on federal agencies and officials, they cannot overturn laws or force other parts of the government to act. They are also subject to judicial review and may be challenged in the courts.

Executive orders are numbered

Executive orders are signed, written, and published directives from the President of the United States that manage the operations of the federal government. They are not the same as laws, which are crafted by Congress and require debates, voting, and the President's signature. Executive orders bypass the congressional approval process and provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented. They carry weight because they are binding instructions to federal agencies and officials on enforcing laws or fulfilling their duties.

While executive orders cannot generate new laws, they possess the force of law within the executive branch's authority. Agencies and employees under the executive branch are obligated to comply with them unless they are overturned by the courts or superseded by legislation. All executive orders must be supported by the Constitution and can be legally challenged in the courts.

Executive orders are often used to make changes or provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented. For example, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233 in 2001, which restricted public access to the papers of former presidents. This order was criticised by the Society of American Archivists and other groups, who argued that it violated existing law on access to presidential papers.

Executive orders are published in the Federal Register

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively and published in the daily Federal Register, the official journal of the federal government, shortly after being signed. The Federal Register is a public record of federal regulations and actions, and executive orders are also catalogued by the National Archives as official documents.

Executive orders are not explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution, but Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." Sections 2 and 3 describe the various powers and duties of the president, including the execution of laws. The Supreme Court has ruled that executive orders must be supported by the Constitution or enacted by Congress. They are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if found to be unconstitutional or lacking statutory support.

Executive orders have been used by presidents to make controversial decisions, such as President Harry Truman's Executive Order 10340, which placed all the country's steel mills under federal control, and President George W. Bush's Executive Order 13233, which restricted public access to the papers of former presidents.

While executive orders are a powerful tool for presidents to manage the operations of the federal government, they are subject to legal scrutiny and must be rooted in the Constitution or statutory law. They cannot supersede existing laws but can be used to clarify or further existing laws or issue new directives within the scope of presidential authority.

Executive orders are issued by the President

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively and are signed, written, and published documents. Every American president since George Washington has issued at least one executive order, with over 13,700 issued since 1789. Executive orders are often controversial, as they can be seen as an attempt by the president to make laws without congressional approval.

The legal basis for executive orders comes from Article Two of the United States Constitution, which grants the president broad executive and enforcement authority to manage the resources and staff of the federal government's executive branch. Executive orders must be supported by the Constitution or enacted by Congress in statutes. They cannot generate new laws but can provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented. Executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution.

The format and documentation of executive orders have varied throughout history, but today they follow a standard format and strict documentation system. The White House issues the order first, and then it is published in the Federal Register, the official daily journal of the federal government. Executive orders are also recorded under Title 3 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, which is a codification of the permanent rules issued by the executive branch.

Executive orders are often used to manage administrative matters and can have a significant impact on policy and how the government operates. They can be used to restrict public access to information, such as in the case of Executive Order 13233 issued by President George W. Bush, or to take immediate action, such as in the case of Donald Trump's pardon of Jan. 6 defendants. While executive orders cannot overturn laws or force other parts of the government to act, they provide the president with a powerful tool to shape policy and direct the actions of the federal government.

Frequently asked questions