Politics And Law: Can Attorneys Practice Both?

A law degree is not a prerequisite for a career in politics or public policy, but it is an advantage. Legal training provides skills in argumentation, legislative interpretation, and advocacy, which are useful for politicians and public servants. Many politicians have a legal background, and some continue to practice law while being involved in politics. Law students can gain experience in politics through internships, volunteering, and extracurricular activities, which can enhance their understanding of the law and its application in the political sphere. They can also explore careers in public relations, communications, consultancy, or the civil service. While a law degree can be a stepping stone to politics, it is important to consider the challenges of political life, such as fundraising and time commitments.

Lawyers in politics

Lawyers have long been viewed as having a good foundation for a career in politics. A law degree is seen as an important credential for a politician, as it suggests a fundamental understanding of how laws work and a respect for the rules. In the past, law and military service were the most common routes to elected office.

However, this may be changing. While lawyers remain the dominant profession among senators and congresspeople, there are now fewer lawyers in Washington than there have been for a generation. This shift may be due to the recognition that politicians can hire lawyers for legal counsel without necessarily being lawyers themselves.

Despite this, lawyers still hold significant power in American politics. They stock the administration and legislatures and have set up institutions to maintain this influence. They also pass legislation to benefit themselves and organize the judiciary to keep it under their control. The United States has the most lawyers per capita of any country, and also has the highest revenues per attorney. This has resulted in a highly litigious society, with the highest share of people incarcerated and litigating for their freedom.

The legal profession's influence extends beyond the judiciary to the legislative and executive branches. As such, lawyers have been able to extract many of their preferred policy positions. One example of this is the fight between politicians and lawyers to select federal and state judges, which has resulted in increasing polarization in the federal courts.

Understanding laws and lawmaking

In the United States, the lawmaking process typically begins with a bill, which is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing one. These ideas can come from sitting members of the Senate or House of Representatives or be proposed during their election campaigns. Citizens can also play a role by contacting their representatives with ideas for new laws or changes. If a representative agrees with a citizen's idea, they will research and write it into a bill. Once a bill has a sponsor and the support of other representatives, it is introduced.

The bill is then assigned to a committee, where members review, discuss, and make changes. The bill is then put before the chamber for a vote. If it passes one body of Congress, it goes through a similar process in the other body. If a bill passes both houses of Congress, they must reconcile any differences between the two versions. The president then considers the bill and can either approve it, signing it into law, or veto it. If the president vetoes a bill, Congress can override the veto in most cases, and the bill becomes a law.

The legislative process is an essential aspect of the American democratic system, providing a safeguard for minority rights and allowing all sides to be heard and make their views known. This process ensures that laws are thoroughly discussed, improved, or defeated before being enacted. Understanding these intricacies is crucial for anyone seeking to make or influence laws, whether as a lawyer or a politician.

Compliance and regulation

In the context of politics, compliance attorneys provide strategic counsel to political clients on finance, ethics, and government regulations. They help political organisations, candidates, and campaigns navigate complex laws and regulations, such as those related to campaign contributions, fundraising, and election law compliance. Compliance attorneys may also specialise in specific areas, such as health law, environmental law, or corporate safety compliance, to ensure that industries meet their respective governmental obligations.

The legal profession's relative autonomy comes with the responsibility of self-government. Lawyers are expected to adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct and aid in securing their observance by other lawyers. This includes maintaining confidentiality, acting with competence and diligence, and conforming to legal requirements in both professional and personal capacities. Disciplinary action may be taken for misconduct, such as fraud or dishonesty, as outlined in the Rules.

While self-regulation is important for maintaining the legal profession's independence from government domination, government regulation may be necessary in cases where lawyers fail to meet their professional obligations. Additionally, in the political sphere, legislators play a role in restricting certain practices, such as foreign political advocacy, and enforcing regulations that ensure legitimate participation, disclosure, and enforcement mechanisms. Overall, compliance and regulation are essential for maintaining ethical standards and public interest in the legal and political domains.

Campaign finance law

The FEC sets contribution limits for individuals and groups, including political action committees (PACs). For example, federal law prohibits corporations and labour unions from making direct contributions to candidates in federal elections. However, they can sponsor separate segregated funds (SSFs) or connected PACs, which can receive and raise funds from a restricted class of individuals, such as managers and shareholders. Nonconnected PACs, on the other hand, are financially independent and must cover their administrative expenses using the contributions they raise.

In addition to regulating PACs, campaign finance laws also address contributions from individuals and organizations. Federal law allows individuals to donate to multiple candidates in each federal election but limits the amount of money they can give. Candidates are required to report their campaign spending, including personal funds, to the FEC. This reporting requirement ensures transparency and allows the public to understand the sources of campaign funding.

The issue of campaign finance has been a subject of ongoing debate and reform efforts. Critics have pointed out the increasing influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in financing electoral campaigns, which can drown out the voices of regular voters. Following court rulings such as Citizens United v. FEC, some limits on campaign spending have been removed, leading to proposals for reform. Suggestions include encouraging small donor public financing and requiring full disclosure of all political spending, including online advertising, to prevent undisclosed "dark money" expenditures from dominating state and local elections.

Lobbying and disclosure

A law degree has long been viewed as a good foundation for a career in politics. Even if one does not practice law, it makes sense for a lawmaker to have a fundamental understanding of how laws work. However, the number of lawyers in politics has been declining.

The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, requires all active registrants to file quarterly activity reports with the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and Secretary of the U.S. Senate. These reports must detail their contributions, including FECA, honorary, Presidential Inaugural Committee, Presidential Library, and certain payments for event costs. The Lobbying Disclosure Act also requires lobbyists to file semi-annual political contribution reports.

The Lobbying Disclosure Act, as amended, states that the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall:

• Provide guidance and assistance on the registrations and reporting requirements of this Act, and develop common standards, rules, and procedures for compliance with this Act.
• Review, and, where necessary, verify and inquire to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of registrations and reports.

The Lobbying Disclosure Act does not provide the Secretary or the Clerk with the authority to write substantive regulations or issue definitive opinions on, or enforce the law. Rather, it is the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia that enforces the Act.

The Lobbying Disclosure Act requires lobbyists to disclose any previous service as a covered executive branch official or a covered legislative branch official in the 20 years before the date on which the employee first acted as a lobbyist for that client. The Act also requires registrations to contain the name, address, and principal place of business of any "affiliated organizations", which are organizations that contribute more than $5,000 to fund the lobbying activities of the registrant and that actively participate in the planning, supervision, or control of such lobbying activities.

A lobbying firm whose total income for matters related to lobbying activities on behalf of a client does not exceed or is not expected to exceed $3,500 in the quarterly period during which the registration would be made is not required to be registered with respect to such a client. Similarly, an organization employing in-house lobbyists whose total expenses in connection with lobbying activities do not exceed or are not expected to exceed $16,000 in the quarterly period during which the registration would be made is not required to be registered.

Frequently asked questions