Hiring Ex-Relatives: Ethical Quandary For Board Members

While there are no legal restrictions or Internal Revenue Service (IRS) prohibitions for related family members to serve together on a nonprofit board, there are certain considerations to be made when it comes to board member appointments, particularly when it comes to family relationships. In this case, we are discussing whether a board member can hire their ex-daughter-in-law. The IRS defines related board members as those related by blood, marriage, or outside business connections. Marriage relations include a son or daughter-in-law, and while former spouses are not considered related, this situation could still fall under the category of outside business connection. It is important to note that state laws vary on the acceptance of related board members, and it is recommended to seek legal advice for specific situations.

Conflict of interest

A board member hiring their ex-daughter-in-law could be considered a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organisation serves multiple interests, and serving one interest could involve working against another. This typically relates to situations in which the personal interest of an individual may adversely affect a duty to make decisions for the benefit of a third party.

In the case of a board member hiring their ex-daughter-in-law, the board member's personal interest in helping a family member could be seen as conflicting with their duty to make decisions in the best interests of the organisation. This could create an awkward dynamic with other board members, who may feel that the ex-daughter-in-law was not the best candidate for the position. It could also discourage unrelated directors from serving in leadership roles and create a perception of bias, even if no bias exists.

To avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, the board member should disclose their relationship with the ex-daughter-in-law and recuse themselves from the hiring decision. This helps to ensure transparency and maintain the integrity of the decision-making process.

It is worth noting that the definition of "related" board members by the IRS is narrow and typically confined to blood, marriage, or outside business connections. In this case, since the board member and ex-daughter-in-law are not related by blood or marriage, and do not have an outside business connection, they may not fall under the IRS definition of "related" board members. However, it is still important to consider the potential for a conflict of interest and take steps to mitigate it.

IRS guidelines

In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) defines "related" board members as those related by blood, marriage, or outside business connections. Blood relations include mother, father, brother, sister, son, daughter, grandmother, or grandfather. Marriage relations include a spouse, son or daughter-in-law, and mother or father-in-law. Two or more business partners serving on the board, while collectively owning 35% or more of a for-profit company, are also considered related.

The IRS does not have any specific statutes or codes that directly address the issue of relationships between board members. However, the IRS does require 501(c)(3) public charities to have at least 51% of the voting members of their board of directors be unrelated to ensure a quorum of unrelated directors can be achieved. This is because the IRS considers related board members to not be completely independent, and there is a potential for private benefit and conflict of interest.

In the case of a board member's relative being hired by the organisation, the related board member must recuse themselves from voting on the hiring and compensation amount for their relative. This is to avoid any potential conflict of interest and ensure compliance with the IRS inurement prohibition, which infers an unwritten rule against majority-related board members.

There are no legal restrictions or IRS prohibitions for related family members to serve together on a nonprofit board. However, it is important to note that state laws may vary on the acceptance of related board members. For example, Florida Statute 496 requires all nonprofits registered to solicit funds in the state to adopt a conflict-of-interest policy and submit it with their annual registration statement.

When employing a child in a family business, the child must perform bona fide (age-appropriate) work for a "reasonable" wage, complying with the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) rules and state child labor laws. The parent must also do federal withholding and remit this to the IRS, as with all employees.

Voting independently

In most cases, there are no legal restrictions on related family members serving together on a nonprofit board. However, state laws vary, and certain requirements must be met to avoid conflicts of interest. For example, the IRS requires 501(c)(3) public charities to have at least 51% of voting members be unrelated to ensure a quorum of unrelated directors.

To maintain independence in voting, board members must disclose any relationships and avoid potential pitfalls. Steps should be taken to ensure impartiality and equal contribution from all members, selecting a more diverse board if necessary. It is essential to prioritize the community engagement and quality of guidance provided to the organization over the comfort of having family members on the board.

While it may be tempting to collaborate with family members and bring in close friends, this can lead to stacking the board with majorities of related members, which can create an unbalanced power dynamic and discourage unrelated directors from leadership roles. Therefore, it is crucial for each board member to vote independently and prioritize the organization's interests, even if it means resigning when conflicts of interest arise.

Board dynamics

Firstly, it is worth noting that family relationships on boards can sometimes create complex dynamics. This is particularly true if the board member and their ex-daughter-in-law have a strained relationship or if other board members feel intimidated about addressing conflicts involving family relations. In such cases, it may result in a reluctance to tackle performance issues or problematic behaviour, leading to frustration and potentially causing unrelated directors to resign. Therefore, it is crucial to foster an environment where conflicts of interest are disclosed and addressed appropriately.

Secondly, the addition of a former family member to the board may impact the diversity of perspectives and experiences. Board members ideally should bring diverse knowledge and backgrounds to enhance decision-making. Family members, including former in-laws, may share similar socio-economic statuses, geographic locations, and ethno-racial backgrounds, reducing the overall diversity of the board. This could potentially hinder the quality of decision-making and leadership within the organisation.

Additionally, the power dynamics between the board member and their ex-daughter-in-law should be considered. If the board member is in a position of authority, such as the board chair, their influence over the ex-daughter-in-law could impact the latter's ability to act independently and express their views freely. This could create an imbalanced power dynamic and potentially discourage the ex-daughter-in-law from actively contributing to board discussions and decisions.

Furthermore, the potential for partiality or favouritism in decision-making should be examined. While the board member may have the best intentions, their personal relationship with their ex-daughter-in-law could unconsciously influence their decisions and create a conflict of interest. This could lead to decisions motivated by personal connections rather than the organisation's best interests.

To maintain the integrity of the board and comply with legal requirements, it is essential to prioritise the organisation's interests above personal connections. While there may be no legal prohibition against hiring an ex-daughter-in-law, board members should carefully consider the potential impact on board dynamics, diversity, power relations, and conflicts of interest. Full disclosure of the relationship and its potential implications is crucial to maintaining a transparent and effective board.

Legal restrictions

In most cases, there are no legal restrictions that prohibit a board member from hiring their ex-daughter-in-law. However, it is essential to consider the potential conflicts of interest and maintain compliance with regulatory requirements.

Firstly, it is crucial to understand how regulatory bodies, such as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), define relationships among board members. The IRS defines "related" board members as those connected by blood, marriage, or outside business connections. In this context, a daughter-in-law falls under the category of a marriage relation, even if the marriage has ended, as long as the board member and their child are still legally related by blood.

Secondly, while there may be no explicit legal restrictions, certain regulatory requirements come into play when dealing with related board members. For instance, the IRS requires 501(c)(3) public charities to have at least 51% of their voting members be unrelated individuals to ensure a quorum of unrelated directors. This requirement aims to maintain a diverse board and mitigate potential conflicts of interest.

Additionally, state laws may have specific provisions regarding related board members. For example, Florida Statute 496 mandates that all nonprofits registered to solicit funds in the state must adopt a conflict-of-interest policy and submit it with their annual registration statement.

It is worth noting that while there may be no legal restrictions, hiring an ex-daughter-in-law can create an awkward dynamic among other board members. It may lead to concerns about impartiality, equal contribution, and the overall functioning of the board. Family relationships on the board can also impact the willingness of unrelated directors to assume leadership roles and may result in a reduced diversity of perspectives, experiences, and backgrounds, which is essential for effective decision-making.

In conclusion, while there may be no explicit legal restrictions prohibiting a board member from hiring their ex-daughter-in-law, it is crucial to consider the potential conflicts of interest, comply with regulatory requirements, and maintain a diverse and impartial board composition.

Frequently asked questions