California Law: Boys Playing Girls' Sports

In California, there is a law that requires equal sports opportunities for girls and boys in K-12 schools. However, there has been controversy over the inclusion of transgender athletes in girls' sports teams. A new bill has been proposed that would ban transgender females from playing on girls' sports teams, citing biological differences and potential advantages as reasons for the ban. This has sparked debates about fairness, safety, and the rights of transgender students. California's stance on this issue has led to protests, lawsuits, and political actions, with some aiming to protect transgender inclusion and others seeking to exclude transgender athletes from girls' sports.

California's bill to ban trans girls from playing in girls' sports

In January 2025, California Assemblymember Kate Sanchez introduced a bill to ban transgender girls from playing on girls' sports teams. The bill, known as the Protect Girls' Sports Act, aims to prevent transgender female athletes from participating in high school sports teams that match their gender identity. This proposal sparked controversy, with some arguing that it would assure a safe and fair playing field for girls, while others viewed it as discriminatory towards the LGBTQ community.

Sanchez and her supporters believe there are undeniable biological advantages for transgender girls in sports, which justifies their exclusion from girls' teams. They cite lawsuits and controversies involving transgender athletes in California schools, claiming that transgender teammates have displaced cisgender girls from their spots on sports teams. The bill intends to protect the integrity and fairness of girls' sports by creating a separate category for transgender athletes.

On the other hand, civil rights and LGBTQ advocates strongly oppose the bill, arguing that it would marginalize and endanger vulnerable transgender students. They dispute the notion that transgender girls consistently outperform their cisgender teammates and emphasize the broader benefits of sports participation, such as teamwork, leadership, and a sense of community. Advocates for transgender inclusion also highlight the existing policies within local schools and state athletic associations that protect transgender athletes while maintaining a level playing field for all.

The bill introduced by Sanchez is not an isolated incident. In February 2025, California lawmakers introduced three bills aimed at combatting trans inclusion, with one specifically targeting sports participation. Assemblymember Bill Essayli's bill would require students to use school facilities and join sports teams based on their biological sex rather than their gender identity. This proposal aligns with former President Donald Trump's executive order, which prompted the NCAA to change its participation policy for transgender athletes, limiting their participation in women's sports.

The efforts to ban transgender girls from playing in girls' sports in California reflect a broader trend across the United States. More than a dozen red states have challenged the Biden administration's expansion of Title IX protections to include LGBTQ students. Additionally, over half of the states have passed restrictions on transgender students' participation in sports, with 25 states enacting laws and two states implementing agency policies. However, it is important to note that the bill proposed by Sanchez failed to advance in the Senate, indicating that the issue remains contentious and subject to ongoing debate.

Girls' access to team sports in California

Equal Opportunities for Girls in Sports

Despite laws requiring equal sports opportunities for girls and boys in federally funded K-12 schools, there are indications that girls in California may not have the same access to team sports as boys. A 2017 study by the Fair Play for Girls in Sports Project found that fewer than half of the surveyed high schools had posted their sports participation numbers as required by law. The data that was posted indicated a six-point gap between the percentage of girls enrolled in schools and the percentage of female athletes, suggesting that girls may be getting fewer chances to play sports despite accounting for approximately half of the student population.

Inclusion of Transgender Athletes in Girls' Sports

The inclusion of transgender athletes in girls' sports has been a highly controversial topic in California. In 2025, several bills were introduced in the state legislature aimed at restricting the participation of transgender athletes in girls' sports. One such bill, the Protect Girls' Sports Act, proposed by Assemblymember Kate Sanchez, would ban transgender females from playing on girls' sports teams, arguing that biological differences give transgender girls an unfair advantage over their cisgender teammates. However, others argue that there is no evidence that transgender students, particularly transgender girls, are dominating girls' sports.

Compliance and Enforcement

Ensuring compliance with equal opportunity laws in sports has been challenging. Schools have various ways to demonstrate that they are serving girl athletes, including providing data on gender representation, showing progress towards proportional representation, or proving through surveys that girls are not interested in playing sports. However, some schools have been accused of ignoring the law and failing to disclose the required data, making it difficult to assess compliance.

While California has laws in place to promote equal access to team sports for girls, the implementation and enforcement of these laws remain ongoing challenges. The controversy surrounding the inclusion of transgender athletes in girls' sports further complicates the issue, with bills proposed to restrict their participation. As debates continue, it remains essential to ensure that girls in California have equal opportunities to participate in team sports and that all athletes are treated with respect and fairness.

California's stance on Trump's order banning trans athletes from girls' sports

California has refused to follow President Donald Trump's executive order, titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports", which bans transgender athletes from participating in girls' and women's sports. The California Interscholastic Federation (CIF), which governs high school sports in the state, has stated that it will continue to allow transgender athletes to play, citing CA law as the reason for their decision. In response, California lawmakers have introduced three bills aimed at combating trans inclusion, with one bill specifically targeting the participation of transgender athletes in sports. This bill, introduced by Assemblymember Bill Essayli, would require students to play on sports teams based on their biological sex rather than their gender identity.

The state's stance on the issue has sparked multiple controversies, with residents holding protests and threatening lawsuits. One such controversy involves Martin Luther King High School in Riverside, California, where a group of parents voiced their opposition to the inclusion of a transgender athlete on the girls' cross-country team. A similar incident occurred at Stone Ridge Christian High School, where the girls' volleyball team forfeited a match due to the presence of a transgender athlete on the opposing team.

Supporters of Trump's executive order argue that it restores fairness in competitive sports, claiming that transgender athletes have physical advantages over their cisgender counterparts. Critics, however, counter that these bans are transphobic and infringe on the rights of a small minority of athletes. They argue that there is no evidence that transgender students, particularly transgender girls, dominate girls' sports or pose any threat to other female athletes.

California's resistance to Trump's order aligns with the Biden administration's stance, which considers the banning of transgender athletes as a form of discrimination. This interpretation is supported by the Supreme Court's definition of "sex discrimination" in Title VII, which includes discrimination based on gender identity. Despite the potential legal challenges, Trump's order threatens to cut off federal funding for schools and educational institutions that do not comply.

California schools' compliance with Title IX

California schools have had a long history of non-compliance with Title IX, a federal law that has prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs since 1972. Title IX applies to schools, local and state educational agencies, and other institutions that receive federal financial assistance from the Department of Education. This includes over 17,600 local school districts, more than 5,000 postsecondary institutions, and charter schools, for-profit schools, libraries, and museums.

In California, a court ruling and the data-disclosure law are pressing schools to do more to comply with Title IX. In 2014, the Ninth Circuit District Court upheld a lower court ruling that the Sweetwater Union High School District had "not fully and effectively accommodated the interests and abilities of female athletes" and was out of compliance with Title IX. The softball team filed a class-action suit, charging that the district gave girls' teams inferior playing fields, facilities, schedules, and transportation vehicles compared to the boys' teams.

A study by the Fair Play for Girls in Sports Project in 2017 found that fewer than half of the high schools surveyed had posted their sports participation numbers on their school or district websites, as the law requires them to do annually. The data that was posted indicated a six-point gap between the percentage of girls enrolled in schools and the percentage of school athletes who are girls. This suggests that girls in California are getting fewer chances to play sports despite accounting for approximately half of the students and showing equal interest in sports compared to boys.

In 2024, California's Attorney General, along with 16 other states, moved to dismiss a coalition lawsuit they had filed against the Department, challenging the current Title IX regulations. The Attorney General, Rob Bonta, stated that the Department's new Final Rule "restores strong protections against sexual harassment and assault and provides critical protection against discrimination for LGBTQ+ and pregnant, and parenting students," aligning with California's state law protections for those students.

In 2025, California lawmakers introduced three bills in the state legislature aimed at combating trans inclusion in girls' sports. One bill, introduced by Assemblymember Bill Essayli, would require students to use school facilities and play on sports teams based on their biological sex rather than their gender identity. Another bill, introduced by Assemblymember Kate Sanchez, would ban transgender females from playing on girls' sports teams. These bills have sparked controversy, with some arguing that they are necessary to ensure a safe and fair playing field for girls, while others view them as discriminatory towards the transgender community.

California's bill to require students to play on sports teams based on biological sex

In California, a bill has been proposed to require students to play on sports teams based on biological sex rather than gender identity. This bill, introduced by Assemblymember Bill Essayli, is one of three proposals aimed at combatting trans inclusion in sports. It would require students to play on sports teams that align with their biological sex, as indicated on an athletics eligibility form signed by a licensed physician.

The bill is a response to California's refusal to follow President Donald Trump's executive order banning trans athletes from participating in girls' and women's sports. It seeks to address concerns about fairness and safety for female athletes, arguing that transgender females have an "undeniable biological advantage" that affects the competitive landscape for girls and women in sports.

Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to protect the integrity of sports and ensure a level playing field for female athletes. They believe that transgender females should not compete on girls' teams, comparing the situation to the use of performance-enhancing drugs. They also highlight the importance of sports in promoting better academic and mental health outcomes for all students.

However, critics argue that this bill contributes to a culture war and divides people. They claim that it is a form of bullying against the LGBTQ+ community and sends a message that transgender students do not deserve the same opportunities as their peers. Additionally, they question the extent of the issue, noting that there is no evidence of transgender students dominating girls' sports.

The bill has sparked controversies in California, with lawsuits and protests emerging in response. It remains a highly debated topic, with strong opinions on both sides.

Frequently asked questions