Conduct Violations: Dual Criminal And Civil Law Breaches

The United States justice system is founded on the ability to appeal a court ruling, and both criminal and civil cases can be appealed. While both criminal and civil law deal with resolving a wrong committed by one party to another, there are several differences between the two. Criminal law covers a system of laws enacted to punish or reform those who have committed a criminal act against a state, nation, or an individual. Civil law, on the other hand, deals with resolving disputes between one entity and another, and the cases are initiated by a private party (the plaintiff). While a single incident can give rise to both criminal and civil proceedings, can certain conduct violate both criminal and civil law?

Criminal cases are initiated by the government, civil cases by private parties

The initiation of criminal and civil cases is one of the primary differences between the two types of law. Criminal law covers a system of laws enacted to punish or reform those who have committed a criminal act against a state, nation, or an individual. In criminal cases, only the federal or state government (the prosecution) may initiate a case. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the punishment for serious (felony) charges often consists of imprisonment but may also include a fine.

On the other hand, civil law deals with resolving disputes or settling monetary or property-related disputes between private citizens or entities. Civil cases are initiated by a private party (the plaintiff) and are usually decided by a judge, although significant cases may involve juries. The plaintiff must establish the defendant's liability, and punishment almost always consists of a monetary award and never includes imprisonment. Civil suits are also often settled outside of the courtroom, sometimes involving a substantial payment to the accuser in exchange for the suit being dropped.

While criminal cases are initiated by the government, civil cases are started by private parties, such as individuals or organisations. This is because criminal law deals with crimes viewed as offences against the state, whereas civil law deals with disputes or violations of individual rights or interests.

In some instances, a single incident can give rise to both criminal and civil proceedings. For example, a drunk driver causes a car accident resulting in serious injuries. While criminal law would address the violation of laws, civil law could be used to seek compensatory damages for the injuries sustained.

Criminal cases involve more serious conduct than civil cases

While both criminal and civil law deal with resolving a wrong committed by one party against another, criminal cases involve more serious conduct than civil cases. Criminal cases involve actions considered harmful to society as a whole, whereas civil cases involve private disputes between at least two private parties.

Criminal cases involve offences against the state, even if immediate harm is done to an individual. They are prosecuted by the state in a criminal court. On the other hand, civil cases typically involve disputes between parties regarding the legal duties and responsibilities they owe to one another. Civil cases are initiated by a private party (the plaintiff) and are usually decided by a judge, although significant cases may involve juries.

Criminal cases are more serious because they carry heavier consequences, including the possibility of jail time and even the death penalty. In civil cases, the resolution does not result in the "losing" party going to jail. Instead, the judgment usually involves a financial penalty and/or an order to change behaviour. For example, a person intentionally killing another person is a criminal offence, whereas a civil offence often looks more like someone failing to follow city code, such as not clearing snow from a sidewalk, which results in someone slipping and getting hurt.

The conduct at issue in criminal cases is generally more serious and frequently involves intent. Civil cases, on the other hand, often involve negligent conduct. Criminal cases have a higher standard of proof, and the prosecution must establish the guilt of the defendant "beyond a reasonable doubt". In civil cases, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, and the standard of proof is lower, requiring only a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way.

Criminal cases result in imprisonment, civil cases in financial penalties

Criminal cases and civil cases differ in their fundamental purpose, procedures, and potential outcomes. In criminal cases, the government prosecutes the accused with the goal of securing criminal penalties that may include imprisonment, fines, probation, or other forms of punishment. The primary focus is on punishing the offender and deterring future criminal behaviour, with the potential consequence of the defendant losing their liberty if found guilty. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must establish the guilt of the defendant "beyond a reasonable doubt", a much higher standard than in civil cases.

On the other hand, civil cases are initiated by the injured party, known as the plaintiff, who seeks financial compensation for the harm suffered. This compensation, often referred to as "damages", can cover a wide range of losses, including medical expenses, lost wages, and the cost of ongoing care for permanent disabilities. Unlike criminal cases, civil cases do not result in imprisonment as punishment. Instead, the resolution of a civil case typically involves a financial penalty and/or an order to change behaviour. Civil suits are also often settled outside of the courtroom, with the defendant making a substantial payment to the accuser in exchange for the suit being dropped and without admitting to any wrongdoing.

The specific conduct at issue also differs between criminal and civil cases. Criminal cases generally involve more serious conduct and frequently include the element of intent. For example, murder, which is the intentional killing of another person, is a criminal offence. Civil cases, on the other hand, often involve negligent conduct, such as failing to follow city codes or breaching contractual obligations. While the conduct at issue in civil cases may result in harm or damage, it typically does not rise to the level of a criminal act.

It is important to note that in some instances, a single incident can give rise to both a criminal case and a civil case. For example, a drunk driver who causes a car accident resulting in serious injuries to another person may face criminal DUI charges as well as a personal injury claim for the damages caused due to their negligence.

Criminal cases require guilt to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt

In the United States, certain conduct can violate both criminal and civil law. For example, a person intentionally killing another person is a criminal offence, and a civil offence may occur when someone fails to follow city code, such as not clearing snow from a sidewalk, which results in someone slipping and getting hurt.

The burden of proof falls upon the prosecution to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that the defendant is guilty of the crime and should be convicted. The prosecution must establish the defendant's guilt so clearly that it must be accepted as fact by any rational person. If the jury cannot say with certainty that the defendant is guilty, then there is reasonable doubt and they are obligated to return a non-guilty verdict.

Reasonable doubt stems from insufficient evidence. It is not enough for the prosecution to establish a probability that a fact charged is more likely to be true than not true. The prosecution must establish the truth of each part of the offence charged by proof that convinces the jury and leaves them with no reasonable doubt.

The presumption of innocence is also sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt. The defendant has the benefit of the presumption of innocence throughout the trial and should only be convicted if the jury is persuaded of their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Civil cases can prompt criminal investigations

Civil cases can indeed prompt criminal investigations, but it is important to note that a civil case does not turn into a criminal one, as they are two separate proceedings. A civil claim can only order civil remedies, and a new criminal case must be initiated for someone to face criminal penalties.

A civil case can lead to a criminal investigation if evidence is found that indicates a law has been broken and a crime has been committed. Civil investigations are typically conducted to enforce regulatory compliance, and they can result in penalties such as fines, injunctions, or other administrative actions. Agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) often conduct these investigations. For example, if an agency uncovers evidence of deliberate financial misstatements or intentional environmental harm, these findings are more likely to be referred for criminal prosecution. The decision to pursue criminal charges is influenced by the severity and nature of the alleged misconduct. Civil agencies may refer cases to the Department of Justice (DOJ) if they find substantial evidence of intentional wrongdoing, deceit, or actions that significantly harm the public interest. The DOJ then evaluates the evidence to determine whether it meets the threshold for criminal prosecution.

In some instances, both a civil suit and a criminal case can stem from the same incident. For example, a drunk driver who causes a car accident that results in serious injuries to another person would face criminal DUI charges and a personal injury claim for the damages caused due to their negligence. While the criminal case is brought by the government against an individual for violations of criminal law, the civil case involves disputes between two parties over private rights or remedies, such as contracts, torts, employment matters, debt collection, and other matters not involving imprisonment as punishment.

The burden of proof also differs between criminal and civil cases. In a criminal case, the government must provide evidence to convince the jury of the defendant's guilt, and the defendant must be found guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". In contrast, a civil case involves a lower burden of proof, with the plaintiff needing to prove the defendant's liability by a "preponderance of the evidence".

Frequently asked questions