Venue And Choice Of Law: Can They Differ?

Choice of law and venue are distinct but closely related concepts. While a choice of law provision determines how a contractual dispute will be resolved, a choice of venue provision controls where the litigation will proceed. The choice of venue is often unfavourable to one of the parties when they are located in different states or countries.

Choice of law and venue provisions in sale transactions

Choice of law and choice of venue provisions are distinct but closely related concepts. While a choice of law provision determines how a contractual dispute will be resolved, a choice of venue provision controls where the litigation will proceed.

The choice of venue is often unfavourable to one of the parties when the parties are located in different states or countries. For example, a Pennsylvanian business that contracted with a New York business, but with New York as the choice of venue, risks losing some of its rights even before getting to court. Convenience is the primary consideration when choosing the venue. A party based in California will not likely want to fly to New York for hearings or trial, and the same is true of the reverse.

A choice of venue provision is an agreement that a court local to you can hear your case. Venue clauses can also bring someone into the purview of your local courts' jurisdiction. Whereas it may not legally be possible to sue someone in a court that is near to you because they live out of state, a choice of venue provision can overcome this.

The choice of law provision, on the other hand, does not care about where your case is filed. Wherever the case is filed, the law of the state that you designate will apply. This is because other states may have laws that make it easier or more favourable for your type of business in court.

Choice of law and venue in contract disputes

Choice of law and choice of venue are distinct but closely related concepts. The choice of law provision determines how a contractual dispute will be resolved, whereas the choice of venue or jurisdiction provision controls where the litigation will proceed.

State courts can apply federal law or the law of any other state, and federal courts can apply the law of any state in addition to federal law. For example, a state court in Oregon can apply Maine law, and a federal court in Florida can apply Colorado law. The choice of law and venue each have different consequences and should be chosen based on different considerations.

The choice of venue provision directs the parties to appear in a courthouse in a particular country, state, or even county. The choice of venue is often unfavourable to one of the parties when they are located in different states or countries. For example, a Pennsylvanian business that contracted with a New York business, but with New York as the choice of venue, risks losing some of its rights even before getting to court.

Venue clauses can also bring someone into the purview of your local courts' jurisdiction. Whereas it may not be legally possible to sue someone in a court that is near to you because they live out of state, a choice of venue provision is an agreement that a court local to you can hear your case.

Choice of venue and jurisdiction

The choice of venue can be unfavourable to one of the parties when they are located in different states or countries. For example, a Pennsylvanian business that contracted with a New York business, but with New York as the chosen venue, may be disadvantaged as an 'outsider' against a local business. Convenience is also a primary consideration when choosing the venue. A party based in California is unlikely to want to travel to New York for hearings or a trial, and the same is true of the reverse.

The courts of one jurisdiction can and regularly do apply the law of another jurisdiction. State courts can apply federal law or the law of any other state, and federal courts can apply the law of any state in addition to federal law. For example, a state court in Oregon can apply Maine law, and a federal court in Florida can apply Colorado law. The choices of governing law and venue each have different consequences and should be chosen based on different considerations.

Choice of venue and local courts

The choice of venue is closely related to a contract's choice of law. However, the choice of venue provision restricts the parties to a specific jurisdiction or venue when resolving contractual disputes. The choice of venue provision directs the parties to appear in a courthouse in a particular country, state, or even county.

Venue and jurisdiction are closely related but not precisely the same. Jurisdiction refers to the power and authority of a court to hear and adjudicate a matter. Designating a particular state's courts as having jurisdiction over the contract means the parties are submitting to the authority of those courts, even if those courts would not have jurisdiction without the existence of the provision. Venue is less about authority than it is about geography.

Venue clauses can also bring someone into the purview of your local courts' jurisdiction. Whereas it may not legally be possible to sue someone in a court that is near to you, because they live out of state, a choice of venue provision is an agreement that a court local to you can hear your case.

Convenience is the primary consideration when choosing the venue. A party based in California will not likely want to fly to New York for hearings or trial, and the same is true of the reverse.

Choice of law and state courts

Choice of law and choice of venue are distinct but related concepts. The choice of venue provision is closely related to a contract's choice of law, but the two are not the same. While a choice of law provision can determine how a contractual dispute will be resolved, a choice of venue or jurisdiction provision controls where the litigation will proceed.

Venue is about geography, whereas jurisdiction refers to the power and authority of a court to hear and adjudicate a matter. Designating a particular state's courts as having jurisdiction over the contract means the parties are submitting to the authority of those courts, even if those courts would not have jurisdiction without the existence of the provision. A choice of venue provision is an agreement that a court local to you can hear your case. For example, a state court in Oregon can apply Maine law, and a federal court in Florida can apply Colorado law.

The choice of venue is often unfavourable to one of the parties when the parties are located in different states or countries. For example, a Pennsylvanian business that contracted with a New York business, but with New York as the choice of venue, risks losing some of its rights even before getting to court. Convenience is the primary consideration when choosing the venue. A party based in California will not likely want to fly to New York for hearings or trial, and the same is true of the reverse.

Frequently asked questions