Congress' Authority To Delegate: Changing Laws?

The delegation of legislative power by Congress to the executive branch is a common practice. Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Homeland Security are given broad discretion in carrying out laws. This delegation is essential for solving complex problems that Congress cannot address alone. However, it potentially undermines the constitutional separation of powers. The Supreme Court has ruled that while Congress cannot delegate strictly and exclusively legislative powers, it may delegate powers that it may rightfully exercise itself. The extent of Congress's ability to delegate legislative powers is informed by two constitutional principles: separation of powers and due process.

Separation of powers

The separation of powers is a founding principle of the United States government. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches are separate, and in general, the different branches cannot delegate their powers to each other. However, the Supreme Court has recognised that Congress may delegate powers which it may rightfully exercise itself.

The extent to which Congress can delegate its legislative powers has been informed by two distinct constitutional principles: separation of powers and due process. A rigid application of separation of powers would prevent the legislative branch from divesting itself of any of its power and conferring it on another branch. However, the doctrine is not so rigidly applied as to prevent the conferral of significant authority on the executive branch.

Congress often delegates legislative power to the executive branch, giving regulatory agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Homeland Security broad discretion in carrying out laws. This delegation is tolerated by judges, who assume that Congress will guard its power from the executive. However, this practice potentially undermines the constitutional separation of powers.

An issue arises when Congress commands that a previously enacted statute be revived, suspended, or modified, or that a new rule be put into operation, upon the finding of certain facts by an executive or administrative officer. In such cases, the delegated function is not that of "filling up the details" of a statute, and authority for it must be sought under some other theory.

Due process

In other words, due process allows for some flexibility in the separation of powers. This flexibility is necessary because, in our increasingly complex society, Congress simply cannot do its job without the ability to delegate power under broad general directives.

However, the real issue is where to draw the line. For example, Congress cannot command that a previously enacted statute be revived, suspended, or modified upon the finding of certain facts by an executive or administrative officer. In such cases, the delegated function is not that of "filling up the details" of a statute, and authority for it must be sought under some other theory.

The Supreme Court's role

The Supreme Court has declared that Congress cannot delegate its legislative power, but it has also recognised that Congress may delegate powers which it may rightfully exercise itself. This is because the administration of the law requires the exercise of discretion, and Congress cannot do its job without the ability to delegate power under broad general directives.

The Supreme Court has long recognised that the real issue is where to draw the line. Under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, Congress can only delegate its powers in certain circumstances. The separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the United States government is one of the founding principles of the nation's government. So, in general, the different branches cannot delegate their powers to each other.

However, the doctrine is not so rigidly applied as to prevent the conferral of significant authority on the executive branch. Congress often delegates legislative power to the executive branch, giving regulatory agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Homeland Security broad discretion in carrying out laws. This delegation transfers power from the legislative to the executive branch of government, potentially undermining the constitutional separation of powers.

The role of regulatory agencies

Congress can delegate its legislative powers to the executive branch, giving regulatory agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Homeland Security broad discretion in carrying out laws. This delegation is necessary because society depends on agencies to solve complex problems that Congress cannot address.

Regulatory agencies are also responsible for staying up-to-date with changes in the law and adapting their policies and procedures accordingly. They must be able to interpret the laws and regulations that they are responsible for enforcing and use their discretion to make decisions that are in the best interest of the public.

In some cases, regulatory agencies may also be involved in the rule-making process, where they work with Congress to develop new laws and regulations. This process involves gathering input from stakeholders, conducting research, and analysing the potential impacts of the proposed rules. Regulatory agencies may also be tasked with providing technical assistance and support to Congress and other government agencies.

It is important to note that the delegation of powers to regulatory agencies is not without its challenges. One of the main concerns is the potential undermining of the constitutional separation of powers. This occurs when the legislative branch delegates too much power to the executive branch, blurring the lines between the two branches of government. However, judges have often tolerated this practice because they assume that Congress will guard its power jealously from the executive.

Contingent legislation

The Supreme Court has sometimes declared that the legislative power of Congress cannot be delegated, but on other occasions has recognised that Congress may delegate powers which it may rightfully exercise itself. The Court has long recognised that the administration of the law requires the exercise of discretion, and that in an increasingly complex society, Congress cannot do its job without the ability to delegate power under broad general directives.

Congress often delegates legislative power to the executive branch, giving regulatory agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Homeland Security broad discretion in carrying out laws. This delegation transfers power from the legislative to the executive branch of government, potentially undermining the constitutional separation of powers. However, judges frequently tolerate the practice because they assume that Congress will guard its power from the executive.

Under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, Congress can only delegate its powers in certain circumstances. The separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the United States government is one of the founding principles of the nation's government. Therefore, the different branches cannot delegate their powers to each other. However, the doctrine is not so rigidly applied as to prevent the conferral of significant authority on the executive branch.

An entirely different problem arises when Congress commands that a previously enacted statute be revived, suspended, or modified, or that a new rule be put into operation, upon the finding of certain facts by an executive or administrative officer. Since the delegated function in such cases is not that of "filling up the details" of a statute, authority for it must be sought under some other theory. Contingent delegation was approved in an early case, The Brig Aurora, upholding the revival of a law upon the issuance of a presidential proclamation.

Frequently asked questions