Congress' Law-Making Power Without Presidential Signature

The US Constitution gives the President the power to veto any bill passed by Congress. If the President feels a law is unconstitutional or ill-advised, they can veto it instead of signing it. This has been a source of conflict between the executive and legislative branches in the past. Congress can, however, pass legislation that may make it difficult or impossible to carry out the order. Additionally, the US Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of whether a law is constitutional or not.

The US President can veto any bill passed by Congress

The US political system is designed with a series of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful. One of the key checks on the legislative power of Congress is the President's ability to veto any bill passed by Congress.

The President's veto power is derived from the Constitution of the United States, specifically Article 1, Section 7, which grants the President the power to veto any bill passed by Congress. This power is often referred to as the "veto power" and allows the President to prevent a bill passed by Congress from becoming law. The President can veto a bill if they feel it is unconstitutional or otherwise ill-advised. The President is constitutionally required to state any objections to the bill in writing, and Congress is then required to consider these objections.

The veto power is not absolute, however, and Congress can override a presidential veto by a two-thirds vote in both chambers. Historically, Congress has overridden about 7% of presidential vetoes. If Congress is unable to secure a two-thirds majority to override the veto, the bill fails to become law unless it is a pocket veto. A pocket veto occurs when a bill is not signed within the ten days allotted, provided Congress is still in session. If Congress adjourns before the ten days have passed, the bill fails to become law.

The veto power has been a significant tool for US Presidents to shape legislation and assert their policy priorities. It is an important check on the power of Congress and helps ensure that laws are faithfully executed in accordance with the President's constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution.

The President must sign a law deemed unconstitutional

The Constitution of the United States grants the President the power to veto any bill passed by Congress. If the President deems a law to be unconstitutional, they can veto it instead of signing it. The President takes an oath to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution and thus has a duty not to sign a law that would be unconstitutional.

However, there is a question of whether the President must enforce laws that they believe to be unconstitutional. Some scholars argue that Presidents must enforce all congressional laws, regardless of their own constitutional opinions. On the other hand, some Presidents have exercised the power to ignore such laws, arguing that they are not true "laws" and thus not subject to the faithful execution duty. This practice can be traced back to Thomas Jefferson, who refused to enforce the Sedition Act, deeming it unconstitutional.

The Take Care Clause, or the duty of the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," has been interpreted differently in this context. Some scholars argue that it prohibits the President from refusing to honour, defend, and enforce federal laws. Conversely, others contend that it grants the President discretion to disregard laws that they deem unconstitutional, especially if there is no credible constitutional defence of those provisions.

Presidents have occasionally indicated in signing statements that they believe certain provisions of a law to be unconstitutional but will enforce it regardless. For example, President Franklin Roosevelt signed a bill during World War II to avoid delaying the war effort but instructed the attorney general to attack the statute in court if it was challenged.

The Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of whether a law is constitutional or not. While it has never explicitly held that the President may decline to enforce unconstitutional statutes, several Justices have hinted at such authority.

Signing statements: their role in conflicts between executive and legislative branches

Signing statements, issued by the president when signing a bill into law, have been in existence since the early 19th century. They can include comments on the bill, the need for the bill, the president's interpretation of the bill's language, and their intent regarding how they will execute the bill. They are not part of the legislative process and have no legal effect.

The use of signing statements has become more prevalent since the Reagan administration, which actively encouraged courts to consider signing statements when interpreting statutory law. This has led to an increase in signing statements containing challenges or objections to the laws being signed. For example, President George W. Bush objected to over 700 provisions of law, usually on the grounds that they infringed on the authority granted to the executive branch by the Constitution.

The increase in the use of signing statements has caused concern among legal commentators, including the American Bar Association, and Congress has introduced legislation to try to limit their use. This is because signing statements can be controversial, particularly when presidents use them to indicate that they will not enforce portions of a law.

Signing statements have played a role in conflicts between the executive and legislative branches. For example, in 1943, during World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt signed a bill but indicated in a signing statement that he felt a section of it was unconstitutional. He said he would enforce the law but instructed the attorney general to attack the statute if it was challenged in court. When this happened, Congress had to appoint a special counsel to defend the statute. The Supreme Court ultimately agreed with President Roosevelt and struck down the provision, citing his signing statement.

Congress passes laws, the President enforces them

In the United States, Congress passes laws and the President enforces them. The US Constitution outlines that the President has the power to veto any bill passed by Congress. This is known as a signing statement, where the President indicates their opinion on the constitutionality of a bill.

The President's signature is not always necessary for a bill to become law. If the President does not sign a bill within ten days of receiving it, and Congress is in session, the bill will become law. This is because the US Constitution states that a bill will become law if not signed or vetoed within ten days of reaching the President's desk.

However, if Congress is not in session, the bill will die. This is a common occurrence, and Congress has devised strategies to keep a bill alive, such as appointing a 'Congressional watchdog' committee to meet every four days to ensure the bill remains valid.

The President also has the power to issue executive orders, which are signed, written, and published directives that manage the operations of the federal government. These are not legislation and do not require approval from Congress. They are, however, published in the Federal Register, the daily journal of the federal government, along with proclamations and certain administrative orders.

The US Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of whether a law is constitutional or not. This was established in Marbury v. Madison in 1803.

Executive orders: instant law, requiring no approval from Congress

Executive orders are a common "presidential" document in modern American government. They are signed, written, and published directives from the President of the United States that manage the operations of the federal government and have the force of law. They are not legislation, and therefore do not require approval from Congress.

Executive orders have been used by presidents to pursue agendas that they cannot get through Congress. They can also be used to cancel the orders of predecessors. While executive orders do not require congressional approval, they can be challenged in court and blocked by Congress by removing funding or creating other hurdles.

The format, substance, and documentation of executive orders have varied throughout history. Today, they follow a format and strict documentation system. The White House issues the order first, then it is published in the Federal Register, the official journal of the federal government. They are also recorded under Title 3 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, a codification of the permanent rules issued by the executive branch. Executive orders are numbered, with each order assigned a unique, consecutive number.

The constitutional basis for executive orders is the president's broad ability to issue directives. While the U.S. Constitution does not address executive orders, and no statute grants the President the general power to issue them, the authority to do so is accepted as an inherent aspect of presidential power. The two primary sources of power to issue directives and executive orders are the Constitution and powers granted to the President by Congress. Congress can also grant additional powers to the President, including the use of executive orders to achieve goals.

Frequently asked questions