Copyright Laws: Exploiting Loopholes For Profit?

Copyright laws are territorial, and while the general idea is the same everywhere, the details of enforcement differ. For example, in the US, copyright infringement can be a criminal matter, whereas in other countries, it is a civil matter. Copyright holders have the right to control most uses of their work, and they can license their work to another party, such as a book publisher. However, there are limits to what can be done with a contract, as some copyright exceptions are unenforceable. For example, in the US, it is legal to show a movie for educational purposes without the copyright holder's permission. In some cases, copyright-protected work can be used without infringing on their copyright, such as when the work is considered fair use or falls within a limitation or exception to copyright law.

Copyright infringement and criminal consequences

Copyright infringement is a complex issue that can have serious criminal consequences. While the general idea of copyright law is consistent worldwide, the details of enforcement vary across different jurisdictions. In the United States, for instance, criminal copyright infringement is addressed through specific legislation, such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and relevant sections of the United States Code (U.S.C.).

The DMCA prohibits circumventing access controls and trafficking in technology or services that facilitate circumvention. Violating these provisions can result in criminal penalties. Under 17 U.S.C. § 1204(a), individuals can be held criminally liable if they willfully circumvent access controls for commercial advantage or private financial gain. The statute of limitations for criminal copyright infringement is five years, and penalties include both prison time and substantial fines. For instance, a first-time offender convicted of violating section 506(a) of the U.S.C. by making unauthorized reproductions or distributing at least 10 copies with a retail value of over $2,500 within a 180-day period can face up to five years of imprisonment, a fine of up to $250,000, or both. Recidivists face enhanced penalties, with a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 for subsequent offenses. Misdemeanors are also penalized with up to one year in prison and a maximum fine of $100,000.

The determination of criminal liability in copyright infringement cases involves assessing the willfulness of the infringement. Courts consider factors such as whether the defendant was given legal notice or had prior knowledge that their conduct was infringing or illegal. For example, ignoring cease and desist letters or continuing infringement after being successfully sued civilly can be interpreted as willful behavior. Additionally, the seriousness of the offense and the likelihood of a successful prosecution play a crucial role in the federal government's decision to pursue criminal charges. Prosecutors consider the number of copies and their worth, with a higher number of infringing copies and greater financial impact increasing the likelihood of criminal prosecution.

While copyright infringement often leads to civil lawsuits, certain acts of infringement can trigger criminal investigations, particularly when profit is involved. The "fair use" doctrine allows limited use of copyrighted material for specific purposes, such as quoting a few lines from a novel in a review. However, wholesale copying of works for profit is illegal and can attract criminal penalties. In such cases, the copyright owner or their legal representatives can initiate civil or criminal proceedings to protect their rights.

Fair use doctrine and its limits

The fair use doctrine is a legal tool that seeks to balance copyright with freedom of expression, education, criticism, research, and access to information. It is a prominent feature of the American legal system, but its influence and debate extend globally.

The doctrine considers several factors to determine whether a particular use of copyrighted material is legitimate. These include the purpose and nature of the use, the nature of the protected work, and the quantity and substantiality of the portion used. For example, quoting a few lines from a novel in a review or using a photograph in a magazine with the photographer's name included may be considered fair use. However, it's important to note that there is no rigid formula to determine fair use, and each case is evaluated individually.

The European Union has a different approach to the exception and limitation of copyright. Instead of a broad and flexible fair use doctrine, the EU uses a closed list of exceptions and limitations defined in the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. These exceptions include use for criticism, comment, teaching, research, and parody, but they are more specific and restrictive than American fair use. For example, use for criticism and comment in the EU is permitted as long as the source is cited, which is a stricter requirement than the flexible approach in the US.

While the fair use doctrine provides a valuable framework for balancing copyright with other interests, it is not without its limits. In some cases, fair use can be difficult to determine, and the outcome of a particular case can be hard to predict. Additionally, the doctrine may not always provide adequate protection against infringement claims, and seeking permission from the copyright owner may be the most prudent course of action. Furthermore, the doctrine of fair use is not universally adopted, and different countries have different approaches to copyright exceptions and limitations.

Licensing and its benefits

Licensing agreements are contracts between two parties, the licensor and the licensee. The licensor is the owner of the property, which can include intellectual property, real estate holdings, personal possessions, or a brand name, trademark, or patented technology. The licensee is the party that is granted the right to use and/or earn revenue from the property of the owner.

Licensing agreements are a significant source of revenue for many companies. For example, Dolby Laboratories earns a major part of its income by licensing its technology to consumer electronics manufacturers. Licensing agreements allow licensors to retain control over their property and access new markets without having to physically set up in those markets. They also allow licensees to gain a monopoly over a product or service in a specific territory at a lower investment rate than they would have to put in alone.

For licensors, licensing agreements can lead to increased brand exposure and revenue generation through licensing fees or royalties. They allow companies to capitalise on their intellectual property without significant investments in manufacturing and distribution. The licensee's distribution network can be leveraged to quickly enter new geographical regions and foreign markets. For example, in 2018, Nestle and Starbucks entered a $7.15 billion coffee licensing deal, where Nestle gained the exclusive rights to sell Starbucks products worldwide through its global distribution network. Starbucks, in turn, received royalties from the packaged coffees and teas sold by Nestle, and gained brand recognition outside of North America.

For licensees, licensing agreements allow them to use a product that the licensor already owns, including trademarks, patents, and branding. They can keep the profits they earn through the use of licensed items, paying the licensor an agreed-upon royalty from these profits for the continued use of their items.

Ownership and transfer of rights

Copyright laws are territorial, and while the general idea is the same everywhere, the details of enforcement differ. For example, in the US, copyright infringement may be considered a criminal offence, whereas in other countries, it is usually a civil matter.

Copyright ownership initially vests in the author or authors of the work. In the case of a "joint work", the co-authors of the work are co-owners of the copyright. However, in the case of a "work made for hire", the employer or other person for whom the work was prepared is considered the author and owns all the rights comprised in the copyright, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

Copyright in each separate contribution to a collective work is distinct from copyright in the collective work as a whole and vests initially in the author of the contribution. In the absence of an express transfer of the copyright or any rights under it, the owner of the collective work is presumed to have acquired only the privilege of reproducing and distributing the contribution as part of that work.

The ownership of a copyright may be transferred in whole or in part by any means of conveyance or by operation of law and may be bequeathed by will or pass as personal property by the applicable laws of intestate succession. Any of the exclusive rights comprised in a copyright may be transferred and owned separately.

A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless it is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or their authorised agent. This also applies to any exclusive rights under a copyright.

When an individual author's ownership of a copyright has not been previously transferred voluntarily, no action by any governmental body or other official or organisation purporting to seize, expropriate, transfer, or exercise rights of ownership shall be given effect. This is to reaffirm the principle that the copyright of an individual author cannot be taken away by any involuntary transfer.

In the case of photographs, ownership of the "work" (the intangible intellectual property) is generally the photographer, or in certain situations, the employer of the photographer. The subject of the photograph has nothing to do with the ownership of the copyright. If the photographer is no longer living, the rights are determined by the photographer's will or passed as personal property by the applicable laws of intestate succession.

Public domain and its advantages

Copyright laws can be exploited for profit in a variety of ways. For example, an individual can purchase a copyrighted work and then resell it to others without the copyright owner's consent under the "first sale doctrine". Additionally, certain works can be partially copied for specific purposes, such as quoting a few lines from a novel in a review, under the "fair use" defence.

Now, onto the topic of public domain and its advantages:

The public domain refers to works that are not protected by copyright law, either because the copyright term has expired or because they were created before copyright laws existed. The term is often used interchangeably with other concepts such as the "public sphere" or "commons". While the idea of the public domain can be traced back to ancient Roman law, the phrase "fall into the public domain" originated in 19th-century France to describe the end of a copyright term.

The public domain is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it allows artists, writers, musicians, filmmakers, and painters to draw on previous works and cultural artifacts for inspiration and creation. For example, many movies and musicals are adaptations of public domain works by Shakespeare, Charles Perrault, and the Brothers Grimm. Secondly, it enables libraries, museums, historians, archivists, teachers, and database creators to collect, preserve, and teach about our cultural heritage. For instance, the Museum of Modern Art, the Library of Congress, and the UCLA Film and Television Archive hold numerous "orphan films" that have entered the public domain.

Additionally, the public domain ensures that certain materials, such as the air we breathe, sunlight, rain, space, and life, remain freely accessible to all. It also promotes the sharing of knowledge and information, as seen with the American Historical Association's creation of a freely available online collection of Civil War newspaper editorials that had entered the public domain.

In summary, the public domain is crucial for fostering creativity, preserving cultural heritage, ensuring access to essential resources, and facilitating the dissemination of knowledge.

Frequently asked questions