Local Laws Vs State: Who Wins?

The relationship between local laws and state laws in the United States is complex. Local laws, also known as municipal or county ordinances, are enacted by local governments and address issues specific to their jurisdiction, such as zoning regulations, noise ordinances, and business licensing requirements. State laws, on the other hand, are enacted by state legislatures and apply uniformly across the entire state, covering a broad spectrum of legal areas such as criminal law, family law, and property law. While local ordinances cannot directly contradict state laws, they can supplement them and provide additional regulations tailored to the needs of a particular community. In certain circumstances, local laws may have the ability to override state laws, depending on the jurisdiction and the specific legal issues involved. This dynamic between local and state laws is crucial to understand for individuals and businesses to ensure compliance and navigate the legal landscape effectively.

Local laws can supplement state laws

In the United States, local laws, also known as municipal or county ordinances, are enacted by local government bodies such as city councils or county commissions. These laws are specific to a particular jurisdiction, such as a city or county, and apply only within that jurisdiction. Local laws often focus on issues that directly affect the local community, such as zoning regulations, noise ordinances, or business licensing requirements.

State laws, on the other hand, are enacted by the state legislature and apply to the entire state. They cover a broad spectrum of legal areas, including criminal law, family law, contract law, property law, and employment law. State laws provide a framework within which local governments operate and establish minimum standards that must be followed by all local jurisdictions.

While local laws cannot contradict or be less restrictive than state laws, they can supplement and provide additional regulations that are specific to the needs of a particular community. For example, while state laws may set forth general requirements for construction projects, local laws can impose additional building codes and permit requirements tailored to the unique characteristics of a locality. This allows local governments to tailor regulations to their communities' unique needs while staying within the boundaries set by state laws.

The relationship between local and state laws is crucial for individuals and businesses operating in the United States. Understanding the differences and similarities between these two legal realms can help individuals navigate the legal landscape effectively and avoid unnecessary legal complications. For instance, in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, Wisconsin's Dane County enacted an ordinance making local public health orders enforceable by civil action. Several individuals challenged the ordinance, arguing that it was preempted by state public health law. The Wisconsin Supreme Court observed that state law preempts a local ordinance when the state legislature has expressly withdrawn the power of municipalities to act, or when the ordinance logically conflicts with state legislation.

In summary, local laws can supplement state laws by providing additional regulations that are specific to the needs of a particular community, as long as they do not contradict or conflict with state laws.

Local laws can be more stringent than state laws

Local laws, also known as municipal or county ordinances, are enacted by local government bodies, such as city councils or county commissions. They are specific to a particular jurisdiction and address issues that directly affect the local community. On the other hand, state laws are enacted by the state legislature and apply to the entire state. While local laws cannot contradict state laws, they can be more stringent and provide additional regulations tailored to the needs of a specific community. For example, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Wisconsin's Dane County enacted an ordinance that enforced local public health orders through civil action. Several individuals challenged the ordinance, arguing that it was preempted by state public health law. The Wisconsin Supreme Court observed that state law would preempt a local ordinance if the state legislature had expressly withdrawn the power of municipalities to act, or if the ordinance logically conflicted with or defeated the purpose of state legislation. In this case, the court ruled that there was no conflict and no preemption because local governments are free to impose stricter regulations than state law.

Another example of local laws being more stringent than state laws pertains to gun control. In California, the city of Morgan Hill enacted an ordinance requiring the theft or loss of a gun to be reported within 48 hours, whereas California state law requires a five-day minimum. When the ordinance was challenged, the California Court of Appeal upheld it, reaffirming California's recognition of cities' broad powers to establish municipal standards in the area of gun control.

Local laws can also supplement state laws in areas such as zoning regulations, noise ordinances, building codes, and business licensing requirements. For instance, while federal law does not require private employers to offer paid sick leave, several state and local jurisdictions have enacted laws that do. Similarly, while federal non-discrimination laws prohibit discrimination based on sex, age, disability, race, colour, religion, genetic information, pregnancy, and national origin, some state and local jurisdictions have enacted their own non-discrimination laws that offer greater protections, such as for gender identity or sexual orientation discrimination.

In the context of minimum wage, local laws can also be more stringent than state laws. Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers must pay non-exempt employees a minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. However, several states and local jurisdictions have set higher minimum wages. If an employee is subject to multiple minimum wage requirements, the rate most generous to the employee generally applies.

State laws take precedence in conflicts

In the United States, power is divided between the federal government and individual states, and within each state, power is further divided between the state government and local governments. This division of power is known as federalism.

State laws are enacted by the state legislature and typically apply uniformly across the entire state. They establish regulations on a wide range of matters, from criminal offenses to property rights, family law, and environmental protection.

Local laws, also known as municipal or county ordinances, are created by local government bodies such as cities, towns, or counties. These laws are specific to a particular jurisdiction and are designed to address issues affecting that community. They can cover a wide range of topics, including zoning regulations, noise ordinances, building codes, and business licensing requirements.

While local laws cannot directly contradict state laws, they can supplement them and provide additional regulations tailored to the needs of a particular community. This is because the principle of preemption gives higher-level governments (in this case, the state) the authority to override or invalidate laws enacted by lower-level governments (local governments).

For example, if a state law prohibits the use of fireworks statewide but a city ordinance permits fireworks within its limits, the state law would take precedence, and the city ordinance would be invalid in that context. Similarly, if a state law sets a minimum wage requirement, a county ordinance cannot set a lower minimum wage.

In some cases, state laws may delegate authority to local governments to regulate certain matters. For instance, a state may grant cities the power to set their own sales tax rates within limits set by the state legislature.

State preemption can nullify local laws

State preemption can be used to quash local initiatives that conflict with the prevailing statewide politics. For example, in 2021, the city of Seaford, Delaware, enacted an ordinance mandating that all fetal remains from abortions or miscarriages be cremated or interred. The state attorney general challenged the local law, arguing that it conflicted with Delaware's statutory scheme for the disposal of human remains. The court agreed and held that the ordinance was preempted and invalid.

State preemption can also be used to prevent local governments from enacting ordinances that are more restrictive than state laws. For example, if a state law sets a minimum wage requirement, a county ordinance cannot set a lower minimum wage. Similarly, if a state law prohibits fireworks statewide, a city ordinance cannot permit them within its limits.

While local laws cannot contradict state laws, they can supplement them and provide additional regulations specific to the needs of a particular community. Local ordinances are enacted by local government bodies and apply only within the jurisdiction of that locality. They address issues specific to the community, such as zoning regulations, noise ordinances, and business licensing requirements.

Local laws are jurisdiction-specific

Local laws, also known as municipal or county ordinances, are enacted by local government bodies such as city councils or county commissions. They are specific to a particular jurisdiction, such as a city or county, and apply only within that jurisdiction. These laws are designed to address issues affecting the local community, such as zoning regulations, noise ordinances, building codes, parking regulations, and business licensing requirements.

The relationship between local laws and state laws is crucial for individuals and businesses operating in the United States. While local laws cannot directly contradict or violate state laws, they can supplement them and provide additional regulations tailored to the needs of a specific community. In other words, local ordinances can be more stringent than state laws but cannot be less restrictive. For example, a state law may set a minimum standard that local governments can choose to exceed. In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, Wisconsin's Dane County enacted an ordinance that enforced local public health orders through civil action. The ordinance was challenged in court, but the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld it, acknowledging that local governments are free to impose stricter regulations than state law.

However, it is essential to understand the hierarchy between local and state laws. State laws are enacted by the state legislature and apply to the entire state, covering a broad spectrum of legal areas such as criminal law, family law, contract law, property law, and employment law. They establish a framework within which local governments operate and set minimum standards that all local jurisdictions must follow. In the event of a conflict between a state law and a local ordinance, state law generally takes precedence, as it has higher authority. For instance, if a state law prohibits the use of fireworks statewide but a city ordinance permits them, the state law would prevail, rendering the city ordinance invalid in that context.

The legal doctrine of preemption further clarifies the relationship between state laws and local ordinances. Preemption occurs when a state law explicitly states that it supersedes any conflicting local regulations on the same subject matter, thereby prohibiting local governments from enacting contradictory ordinances. State preemption has been increasingly used in recent years, particularly in politically polarized states, to quash local initiatives that may deviate from or conflict with state-level objectives.

Frequently asked questions