Common Law: Can Courts Disregard It?

Common law is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents established by the courts. It is derived from judicial decisions instead of statutes and is practiced in several countries, including the US, UK, Canada, India, and Australia. While common law systems rely on case law and legal precedent to guide their decisions, civil law systems primarily depend on codes and statutes. In common law, courts can reinterpret and revise the law without legislative intervention to adapt to new trends, and they are not absolutely bound by precedent. However, they may disregard non-binding precedent. This flexibility allows common law to respond to societal changes and address situations not contemplated by lawmakers.

Common law is based on legal precedent and previous rulings

Common law, also known as case law, is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents and previous rulings established by the courts. It draws from institutionalized opinions and interpretations from judicial authorities and public juries. Common law originated in the practices of the courts of the English kings in the centuries following the Norman Conquest in 1066. It is distinct from civil law, which is a comprehensive, codified set of legal statutes created by legislators. While civil law clearly defines the cases that can be brought to court, the procedures for handling claims, and the punishment for an offense, common law is more flexible and allows for interpretation. This is because common law is based on precedent and previous rulings, which are maintained over time through court records and historical documentation in collections of case law known as yearbooks and law reports.

The reliance on judicial opinion and precedent in common law systems provides a significant advantage in terms of predictability and consistency. As Justice Brandeis famously expressed, "in most matters, it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right." This predictability allows parties, especially commercial entities, to anticipate the legality of their actions and make more informed decisions. It also enables them to come close to the boundaries of the law, creating greater wealth and efficiency.

The common law system also offers stability and consistency in the legal justice system. The example set by higher courts is binding on cases tried in lower courts, providing a framework for decision-making. However, lower courts are not absolutely bound by precedent and can modify, deviate from, or overturn precedents if they are outdated or substantially different from the current case. This flexibility allows the common law to adapt to new trends in political, legal, and social philosophy over time.

While common law provides flexibility and adaptability, it is not without its challenges. The lack of a formal legal code can make it more difficult to determine the applicable law in a given situation. It requires a thorough understanding of the facts, relevant statutes, and previous cases to interpret how the next court is likely to rule. Additionally, the reliance on precedent can make it challenging to address unique or unprecedented situations that were not contemplated by previous legislation.

Common law is unwritten law, relying on court decisions, not codes or statutes

Common law, also known as case law, is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents and court decisions. It is distinct from civil law, which is a comprehensive, codified set of legal statutes created and passed by legislators. Common law is derived from judicial decisions and opinions, and while it may incorporate certain statutes, it is primarily based on precedent and not codes or statutes. This means that common law relies on past court rulings and judicial interpretations rather than written rules or codes.

The concept of common law originated in England, in the practices of the courts of the English kings following the Norman Conquest in 1066. It then spread to North America during the 17th and 18th centuries, and today, the US operates under a dual system of both common and civil law. Common law is also practiced in several other countries, including Canada, India, Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

In a common law system, courts can address situations not originally contemplated or predicted by lawmakers. This flexibility allows the law to be adapted to new and evolving circumstances. Judicial opinions in common law tend to be lengthy, providing rationales and policies that can be balanced with judgment in future cases, rather than relying solely on bright-line rules. Common law systems value precedent, and court records are maintained over time to document past decisions, often in collections of case law known as yearbooks and law reports.

While common law provides flexibility and adaptability, it has also faced criticism. One notable critique is that of judicial overreach, where judges are seen as "making law" rather than simply interpreting existing statutes. Additionally, past decisions in common law may continue to shape future rulings, even if they are outdated or biased, until societal changes prompt a judicial body to overturn the precedent. This can result in the marginalization or disempowerment of certain groups.

Common law is flexible, addressing situations not predicted by lawmakers

Common law is a body of law that is primarily based on past court decisions and judicial precedent, rather than statutes or codes. It is a flexible system that can address situations not originally predicted or accounted for by lawmakers, as it is based on precedent and the principle of stare decisis, meaning that judges can rely on previous rulings in similar cases to inform their decisions. This flexibility allows common law to respond to changes in society and new scenarios that may arise.

Common law originated in England following the Norman Conquest in 1066, when the practices of the courts of the English kings became "common" across the kingdom. Today, several countries, including the US, Canada, India, and Australia, rely heavily on common law to resolve legal disputes.

The flexibility of common law lies in its ability to address unique or unforeseen situations. When lawmakers create statutes, they cannot possibly predict all the scenarios in which courts may need to apply the laws. Common law allows courts to address these situations by relying on past judicial decisions and adapting to new circumstances. This adaptability is a significant strength of common law systems and contributes to the efficiency and robustness of commercial systems in countries like the UK and the US.

In common law systems, higher courts can overrule prior decisions as "bad law" without needing to wait for lawmakers to make changes to statutes. This means that common law can evolve and adapt to societal changes more quickly than civil law systems, which require formal legislative changes. Judicial opinions in common law systems are typically quite long, providing rationales and policies that can be balanced with judgment in future cases, allowing for flexibility and adaptability in the legal system.

Overall, the flexibility of common law lies in its reliance on judicial precedent and its ability to address situations not predicted by lawmakers. This flexibility enables the legal system to adapt to changes in society and new scenarios, ensuring that justice can be served even in unforeseen or unique circumstances.

Common law is efficient, saving time and money

Common law is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents established by the courts. It is efficient, saving time and money for several reasons.

Firstly, common law provides a degree of flexibility that allows for the adaptation of laws to new trends in political, legal, and social philosophy. This flexibility enables the law to evolve and address situations that may not have been contemplated by the legislature at the time of its creation. As a result, common law can reduce the need for costly and time-consuming legislative interventions.

Secondly, common law offers a level of predictability, especially for commercial parties, as they can anticipate the legality of their actions based on established precedents. This predictability can lead to more efficient decision-making and reduce the potential for costly legal disputes.

Additionally, common law systems rely on the detailed records of similar past situations, known as stare decisis, to guide future decisions. This reliance on precedent helps maintain consistency and reduce the potential for biased interpretations, further contributing to efficiency by saving time and money.

However, it is worth noting that civil law can sometimes be clearer and more detailed than common law, particularly when the legislature has addressed a precise set of facts. In such cases, civil law statutes may provide a more straightforward solution, potentially saving time and resources.

Overall, while common law offers efficiency through its adaptability, predictability, and reliance on precedent, there may be instances where civil law provides a more efficient solution due to its clarity and specificity.

Common law is used in many countries, including the US, Canada, India and Australia

Common law, also known as case law or judge-made law, is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents established by the courts. It is primarily developed through judicial decisions rather than statutes. Common law is used in many countries, including the US, Canada, India, and Australia, and is one of the most prevalent legal systems in the world.

In the US, common law is the basis of the legal system at both the federal level and in each state and territory, with the partial exception of Louisiana and Puerto Rico. The US common-law system evolved from a British tradition that spread to North America during the 17th and 18th centuries. All US states, except Louisiana, have either implemented reception statutes or adopted common law by judicial opinion.

Canada has a mixed legal system, with both federal and provincial legal systems. Each province and territory is considered a separate jurisdiction with respect to case law. All but one of the provinces of Canada use a common law system for civil matters (except Quebec, which uses a civil law system for issues within provincial jurisdiction). Canadian Federal Courts operate under a separate system and deal with a narrower range of subject matter than superior courts in each province and territory. They hear cases on subjects assigned to them by federal statutes, such as immigration and intellectual property.

In India, common law is also practiced, and certain international trade laws, such as those on intellectual property, are enforced. Post-partition, both Pakistan and Bangladesh retained their common law systems.

Australia uses common law at both the federal level and in each of its states and territories. Common law originated in England following the Norman Conquest of 1066 and spread around the world as England built its empire. Today, it is used almost exclusively by countries that were once British colonies.

Frequently asked questions