Federal Power Play: Can They Repeal State Laws?

The United States Constitution has established a federalist system of government, with powers shared between the federal government and the states. While the federal government has the power to pass laws that supersede or invalidate state laws, it cannot directly modify or repeal state laws. This principle, known as federal preemption, is derived from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Federal preemption applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from state legislatures, courts, or administrative agencies. While Congress can incentivize states to modify their laws, the direct modification of state laws is limited by the anti-commandeering doctrine established by the Supreme Court. This doctrine restricts Congress's authority to regulate the operations of state governments.

Federal courts can overturn state court decisions

The US legal system is a complex one, with powers shared between state and federal governments, and the courts of both. Federal courts can overturn state court decisions in certain circumstances, but not directly.

The US Constitution establishes a separation of powers, dividing the US government into three branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. The legislative branch, or Congress, has the power to make laws. The executive branch has the power to enforce laws. The judicial branch has the power to interpret laws.

The judiciary has the power to hear cases involving the Constitution, federal laws, treaties, and disputes between states or citizens of different states. Federal courts are for resolving disputes between individuals and the government, or between governments of different states. They are not for disputes between different branches of the same state government.

A state court decision can be challenged in federal court if a federal basis for the challenge can be given. For example, in Bush v. Gore, Bush argued that the Florida Supreme Court's order of a recount violated the Equal Protection clause of the federal constitution.

The Supreme Court has encouraged lower federal courts to use certification procedures, allowing them to refer unsettled questions of state law to state courts. Most states have adopted rules that allow for this. Federal courts can also use the abstention doctrine, where they abstain from exercising jurisdiction if the relevant state law is unclear and a state court's interpretation of the law might make resolving a federal constitutional issue unnecessary.

Congress can pass new legislation or amend existing laws to address the issues raised by a court's decision, but these laws are subject to review by the Court, which can invalidate them.

Congress cannot rewrite state laws

While the federal government can repeal state laws, Congress cannot rewrite state laws. The U.S. Supreme Court has limited the authority of Congress to directly regulate the operations of state governments. This is called the anti-commandeering doctrine.

The anti-commandeering doctrine was articulated in U.S. Supreme Court cases like New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). This case held that the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 was unconstitutional because it required states to provide for the disposal of waste generated within their borders. The federal government cannot compel states to enact a certain law, as in aspects of Obamacare as decided in NFIB v. Sebelius.

Congress is limited to rewriting acts previously enacted by Congress. It cannot rewrite a state law or a federal regulation, which is written by the executive branch. While Congress cannot rewrite a state law, it can rewrite an act of Congress that was the statutory underpinning of a federal regulation. This normally results in the executive branch rewriting some regulation in a manner consistent with what Congress wrote.

Congress might pass a law that has the indirect effect of inspiring a state to rewrite one of its laws. For example, a new law might put stronger conditions on federal funding, which could inspire a state to modify some law regarding college funding or highway operations.

State laws can be held unconstitutional

The US Constitution does not allow the federal government to directly modify or repeal state laws. However, state laws can be held unconstitutional, and the US Supreme Court has the power to limit the authority of Congress to directly regulate the operations of state governments. This is known as the anti-commandeering doctrine.

A state legislature can repeal a state law at any time. If a state legislature repeals a federal law, it does not affect the federal law but may influence its interpretation and application within that state. The US Constitution allows for the repealing of laws by Congress, which involves passing a bill and then having it signed by the President. The President can also propose repealing legislation to Congress, and courts can declare a law unconstitutional, making it null and void. However, courts cannot directly repeal a law due to the separation of powers between the three branches of government: the judiciary, executive, and legislature.

There are several examples of state laws being held unconstitutional. In United States v. Peters (1809), a Pennsylvania statute prohibiting the execution of any process issued to enforce a federal court sentence was deemed unconstitutional as the federal court was not ousted of jurisdiction. In Fletcher v. Peck (1810), a Georgia statute annulling the conveyance of public lands authorized by a prior enactment violated the Contracts Clause (Art. I, § 10) of the Constitution. Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) involved a New Hampshire law that altered a charter granted to a private corporation by the British Crown before the Revolution, which also violated the Contracts Clause (Art. I, § 10).

Other cases include Farmers' and Mechanics' Bank v. Smith (1821), where a Pennsylvania insolvency law violated the Contracts Clause (Art. I, § 10) by purporting to discharge a debtor from prior obligations. In Green v. Biddle (1823), a compact between Virginia and Kentucky negotiated during their separation stipulated that rights acquired under a Kentucky statute would be protected by Virginia. This was held to be unconstitutional as it impaired the obligation of contracts.

The President can propose repealing legislation

The President's proposal to repeal a law is sent to Congress, which is responsible for proposing and passing legislation. Both houses of Congress must pass the legislation revoking an existing law for it to be repealed. The President can also veto legislation passed by Congress, which would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate to override.

While the President can propose repealing legislation, they cannot themselves repeal a law. The power to repeal a law lies with Congress, which can pass a bill that the President then signs. Courts can also effectively repeal a law by declaring it unconstitutional, but they cannot directly repeal a law.

The U.S. Supreme Court has limited the authority of Congress to directly regulate the operations of state governments through the anti-commandeering doctrine. This means that while the federal government can repeal a state law, it cannot compel states to enact a certain law.

The process of repealing a law; how laws are made

In the United States, the lawmaking branch of the federal government is Congress. A bill is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing law. The idea for a bill can come from a sitting member of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives, be proposed during their election campaign, or be petitioned by people or citizen groups. Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill. The bill is then put before that chamber to be voted on. If the bill passes one body of Congress, it goes to the other body to go through a similar process of research, discussion, changes, and voting. Once both bodies vote to accept a bill, they must work out any differences between the two versions. If the president chooses to veto a bill, in most cases, Congress can vote to override that veto and the bill becomes a law. However, if the president does not sign off on a bill and it remains unsigned when Congress is no longer in session, the bill will be vetoed by default, which is called a pocket veto and cannot be overridden by Congress.

A law can be repealed in its entirety, in part, or to the extent that it contravenes other laws. The process of repealing a law is different from amending or revoking a law. When a law is amended, it is changed in part, and when a law is revoked, it is completely nullified. A law is repealed when the legislature thinks there is no longer a need for the law to exist. Legislation can also have a "sunset" clause, a particular date after which they cease to exist. For laws that do not have a sunset clause, the legislature must pass another bill to repeal the law. The official term for repeal is when one legislative body officially cancels or annuls a previous law. While a court can declare a law unconstitutional, which will normally make the law null and void, it cannot repeal it due to the separation of powers between the three branches of government: the judiciary, executive, and legislature.

Frequently asked questions