Federal Law Enforcement: Overstepping Local Jurisdiction?

Federal law enforcement officers typically have the authority to make warrantless arrests for violations of federal law anywhere in the United States. However, the scope of their jurisdiction can vary depending on the nature of the land they are enforcing the law on. For example, federal lands can be categorized as proprietary jurisdiction, where state and local law enforcement officers handle calls for service as if the land were privately owned. On the other hand, federal law enforcement officers can exercise their authority on government property and lands owned by the federal government, such as national forests. In terms of crossing state lines, officers can generally enforce criminal law but may need to cooperate with other jurisdictions to make arrests or issue tickets.

Jurisdiction of Federal Law Enforcement in Towns

Federal law enforcement can make arrests for violations of federal law anywhere in the US

In the US, law enforcement officers' authority to make arrests is generally restricted to their own geographic territory, also known as "territorial jurisdiction". However, federal law enforcement officers, such as FBI agents, are authorised to make arrests for violations of federal law anywhere in the country. For example, FBI agents in Oregon would have the jurisdiction to arrest someone who robbed banks in Portland, violating the Federal Bank Robbery Act.

Each state has the power to define the territorial jurisdiction of its officers and determine the circumstances under which out-of-state or federal officers can make arrests within its borders. Many states have agreements with neighbouring cities and counties, especially in densely populated areas, allowing officers to arrest in multiple jurisdictions. This prevents suspects from evading arrest by fleeing to another jurisdiction.

State and local law enforcement officers may also be authorised to enforce federal law under certain conditions. For instance, in Connecticut, state and local police are permitted to arrest individuals for violations of federal criminal law, provided that federal law explicitly or implicitly allows them to do so. In some cases, the authority to enforce federal immigration laws has been extended to state and local officers when authorised by the US Attorney General or in response to an emergency situation.

It is important to note that while officers outside their territorial jurisdiction may have the power to make a citizen's arrest, their arrest powers are generally more limited than those of law enforcement officers within their jurisdiction.

Local police with state peace officer status can operate in other jurisdictions within their state

In the US, most local police officers hold state peace officer status, enabling them to operate within other jurisdictions in their state. This status is particularly useful in emergencies, allowing officers from different towns in the same state to provide support. For example, in Arizona, any AZ POST (Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training) certified officer can enforce the law anywhere in the state. If a Phoenix police officer witnesses a crime in Flagstaff, they can and must make the arrest.

However, this may not be the case in all states, and there are exceptions to the rule. For instance, Texas has a slightly different arrangement, where police officers can only issue tickets in their home county, but can enforce criminal law across the state.

When crossing state lines, police officers typically cannot act as officers of the law in the other state. However, if they are pursuing someone who crosses the state line, they can radio ahead to the other jurisdiction and cooperate to apprehend the suspect, and then decide where to hold them and where charges will be filed.

Jurisdictions can be large and overlap, and there are often mutual aid agreements in place. For example, campus police may have a 15-mile radius outside their campus, effectively giving them city police powers. There are also agreements between neighbouring cities and counties, especially in densely populated areas, that allow officers to arrest in multiple jurisdictions.

Federal law enforcement officers are subject to certain limitations regarding their peace officer status. For example, California explicitly excludes federal law enforcement officers from its definition of peace officers. However, under a separate provision, duly authorised federal employees who meet training requirements are defined as peace officers when enforcing state or local laws on US government or adjacent property, provided they have the written consent of the sheriff or police chief of the jurisdiction.

Ten out of 43 states include federal law enforcement officers in their definition of peace officers for law enforcement purposes. These states are Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Utah. Some of these states impose limitations on the federal officers classified as peace officers.

Jurisdiction is defined by statutory and common law guidelines

Jurisdiction is a term that is often used to refer to a court's power. In the US, jurisdiction is defined by statutory and common law guidelines.

The power of a court to determine a jurisdictional question is referred to as "jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction". The court's authority to decide the issue in controversy, such as a contract issue or a civil rights issue, is called subject matter jurisdiction. State courts have general jurisdiction, which means they can hear any controversy except those prohibited by state law. For example, some states deny subject matter jurisdiction for a case that does not involve state citizens and did not take place in the state.

In the US, federal courts have limited jurisdiction and can only hear cases that fall within the scope defined by the Constitution and Congressional statutes. Federal court territorial jurisdiction is determined by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution's Fifth Amendment. On the other hand, state court territorial jurisdiction is determined by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In terms of law enforcement, federal officers like FBI agents may generally arrest for violations of federal law anywhere in the United States. For instance, FBI agents in Oregon would have the authority to arrest someone who robbed several banks in Portland, thereby violating the Federal Bank Robbery Act. However, officers outside their territorial jurisdiction have no greater power to arrest than any other citizen.

In the context of federal law enforcement on federal property, there are three general categories of federal land ownership: proprietary jurisdiction, federal nexus, and federal connection. The largest percentage of federal land is held in the category of proprietary jurisdiction, where the government has taken over none of the state's obligations for law enforcement, and state and local law enforcement officers handle calls for service as if the land were privately owned. Federal nexus and federal connection refer to when a federal connection creates a need for federal law enforcement on a particular piece of federal property.

Federal land ownership falls into three categories, with varying levels of federal law enforcement

Federal law enforcement officers can generally make arrests for violations of federal law anywhere in the United States. For instance, FBI agents in Oregon would have the authority to arrest someone who robbed several banks in Portland, thereby violating the Federal Bank Robbery Act. However, federal land ownership falls into three categories, with varying levels of federal law enforcement.

The largest percentage of federal land is held in a category known as proprietary jurisdiction, where the government has taken over none of the state's obligations for law enforcement. In these cases, state and local law enforcement officers handle calls for service as if the land were privately owned. Millions of acres of national forest lands are considered to be proprietary jurisdiction.

The second category of federal land ownership is known as concurrent jurisdiction, where the federal government shares law enforcement authority with the state. This means that both federal and state law enforcement officers have the authority to enforce the law on these lands. An example of concurrent jurisdiction is when a federal building is located on state land.

The third category of federal land ownership is exclusive federal jurisdiction, where the federal government has complete law enforcement authority. This includes lands such as military bases and other secure government facilities.

It is important to note that the level of federal law enforcement on each category of federal land may vary depending on various factors, such as the availability of resources and the presence of private inholdings. Additionally, the type of jurisdiction can vary even within a single federal installation, further complicating law enforcement efforts.

Officers outside their jurisdiction have no more power to arrest than any other citizen

In the United States, law enforcement officers' authority to make arrests is generally limited to their own geographic territory, also known as "territorial jurisdiction". This means that local police officers can typically only arrest suspects in the city or municipality that employs them. For example, a Chicago police officer can ordinarily only make arrests in Chicago.

However, there are exceptions to this rule. Firstly, federal law enforcement officers, such as FBI agents, generally have jurisdiction anywhere in the United States and can arrest individuals for violations of federal law. For instance, FBI agents in Oregon would have the authority to arrest someone who robbed banks in Portland, violating the Federal Bank Robbery Act. Secondly, each state can define territorial jurisdiction within its borders and may permit out-of-state or federal officers to arrest individuals within the state under certain circumstances. For example, many states have laws allowing neighbouring cities and counties to have written agreements that enable officers to make arrests in multiple jurisdictions. Thirdly, officers outside their jurisdiction may still make a citizen's arrest if they witness a crime, although this is subject to the state's rules for citizen's arrests. For instance, many states only allow citizen's arrests for misdemeanours and felonies, not petty offences.

Despite these exceptions, officers outside their jurisdiction generally have no more power to arrest than any other citizen. In most states, each type of law enforcement officer is restricted to making arrests in the city or municipality that employs them. For example, a Nevada Highway Patrol officer cannot follow a speeding driver into California and make a stop, as they do not have the authority to make an arrest in California. Similarly, a police officer in Arizona cannot cross the state line into California to make an arrest without special permission from the state.

If an individual believes they have been wrongfully arrested by an officer outside their jurisdiction, they can contact a criminal defence attorney to evaluate the circumstances of their arrest and discuss possible defences to any pending charges.

Frequently asked questions