Restatements Of Law: Jurisdictional Authority And Adoption

Restatements of the Law are highly persuasive secondary sources that are routinely relied on by courts in the United States. They are not binding authority, but they can become binding law if adopted by a jurisdiction. Restatements are compilations of case law, which are common law doctrines that develop over time due to the principle of stare decisis (precedent). While courts are not formally obligated to adopt Restatement sections as the law, they often do so because these sections accurately restate established law in a given jurisdiction. This has led to some debate over the extent to which Restatements are considered authoritative.

Explore related products

Restatement of the Law Torts: Products Liability: Final

$129

Restatement of the Law, Third, Property-Mortgages

$149

Contract Law and Theory (2023 Document Supplement): Selected Provisions: Restatement of Contracts, Uniform Commercial Code, and CISG

$59.6

A Concise Restatement of Donative Transfers and Trusts (Concise Hornbook Series)

$50.25

Restatement (Second) of Contracts

$9.99

Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment

$45.95

Restatements are not primary law but are considered persuasive by courts

The Restatements of the Law are one of the most respected and well-used sources of secondary authority, covering almost every area of common law. They are essentially compilations of case law, which are common law judge-made doctrines that develop gradually over time due to the principle of stare decisis (precedent). Each Restatement section includes a black-letter principle, comments, illustrations, and reporters' notes, which provide a detailed discussion of all the cases that went into the principle summarised in that section.

By citing a Restatement section in a legal brief, a lawyer can bring to the attention of a judge a carefully studied summary of court action on almost any common law legal doctrine. The judge can then consider the Restatement section and decide how to apply it to the case at hand. While courts are not formally obligated to adopt Restatement sections as the law, they often do so because these sections accurately restate the already-established law in their jurisdiction. This is particularly common in the United States, where there is no nationwide court of final common law adjudication.

The persuasive nature of Restatements was emphasised by Benjamin N. Cardozo in a 1923 lecture at Yale Law School. He described them as having "unique authority, not to command, but to persuade". This unique authority is derived from the composite thought and voice of the universities, bench, and bar that contribute to their creation.

Explore related products

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement

$34 $34

Dispensationalism Revisited: A Twenty-First Century Restatement

$19.99

Selections from the Restatement (Second) Contracts and Uniform Commercial Code for First-Year Contracts 2025 Supplement (Supplements)

$80

Restatements are rarely adopted outside of the United States

Restatements are authoritative statements of law that are often adopted by courts in the United States. They are highly persuasive sources of law, even if not binding, and are considered secondary authority. While courts are not under any formal obligation to adopt Restatement sections as the law, they often do so because such sections accurately restate the already-established law in that jurisdiction.

However, Restatements are rare in common law jurisdictions outside of the United States, where law reports are more frequent. This is partly due to the lack of a nationwide court of final common law adjudication in the US. The Restatements are produced by the American Law Institute (ALI), a private organization of experts set up to clarify and simplify the law. The ALI is made up of prominent judges, law professors, and attorneys.

The Restatements have been criticized by some renowned legal scholars, who argue that they are flawed and lack the force of law on their own. Despite this, courts in every US jurisdiction routinely rely on them and treat them as formal and authoritative sources of law. This anomalous treatment by courts has distorted the process of common law development and introduced institutional problems.

While Restatements are rarely adopted outside the US, they have been influential in some cases. For example, Andrew Burrows refers to the Restatements of the Law as informing the work of the advisory group that he convened to produce "A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment". Additionally, in 2018, the Supreme Court of Washington adopted the "apparent manufacturer" doctrine as set forth in the Restatement Second, Torts § 400 for common-law product-liability claims.

Restatements are not binding authority but are treated as formal and authoritative sources of law

Restatements are not binding authority but are treated as formal and authoritative sources of law. They are considered secondary authority, and while courts are under no formal obligation to adopt Restatement sections as the law, they often do. This is because Restatements accurately restate already-established law in a given jurisdiction or on issues of first impression.

Restatements are rare in common law jurisdictions outside the United States, where law reports are more frequent. In the US, they are one of the most respected and well-used sources of secondary authority, covering almost every area of common law. Restatements are compilations of case law, which are common law, judge-made doctrines that develop gradually over time due to the principle of stare decisis (precedent). They are meant to reflect the consensus of the American legal community on what the law is and, in some cases, what it should become.

Restatements are produced by the American Law Institute (ALI), an organisation of prominent judges, law professors, and attorneys. The ALI was established when attorneys and judges became concerned that the growth and complexity of case law threatened to break down the common law system. Restatements are an attempt to clarify and restate the law that already exists.

The extent of the Restatements' authority has been a matter of some debate. While they are not formal sources of law, courts treat them as such, and this anomalous treatment has distorted the process of common law development. Courts have resorted to a variety of different techniques of reliance in their use of Restatements, many of which unwittingly limit their own lawmaking power in the common law over time.

Restatements are compilations of case law, which are common law judge-made doctrines

Restatements are considered compilations of case law, or common law, which are judge-made doctrines. Common law is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents established by the courts. It is generally uncodified, meaning there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. It relies on previous decisions, or precedents, which are maintained through court records and historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports.

In the United States, Restatements of various subject matter areas are edited by the American Law Institute (ALI) and collect the common law for that area. The ALI Restatements are often cited by American courts and lawyers for propositions of uncodified common law and are considered highly persuasive authority, just below binding precedential decisions.

Each Restatement section includes a black-letter principle, comments, illustrations, and reporters' notes, which are detailed discussions of all the cases that went into the principle summarised in that section. By citing a Restatement section in a legal brief, a lawyer may bring to the attention of a judge a carefully studied summary of court action on almost any common law legal doctrine. The judge can then consider the Restatement section and make an informed decision as to how to apply it in the case at hand.

While courts are under no formal obligation to adopt Restatement sections as the law, they often do so because such sections accurately restate the already-established law in that jurisdiction or on issues of first impression. Restatements are considered one of the most respected and well-used sources of secondary authority, covering nearly every area of common law. They are meant to reflect the consensus of the American legal community as to what the law is and, in some cases, what it should become.

Restatements are an attempt to clarify and simplify the law

Restatements are a set of treatises on legal subjects that seek to inform judges and lawyers about the general principles of common law. They are written and published by the American Law Institute (ALI), a legal organisation composed of noted professors, judges, and lawyers. Restatements are an attempt to clarify and simplify the law. They are meant to reflect the consensus of the American legal community on what the law is and, in some cases, what it should become.

Restatements are highly persuasive sources of law, even if they are not binding. They are considered secondary authority, and their authoritativeness is evidenced by their acceptance by courts throughout the United States. Restatements are rare in common law jurisdictions outside of the United States, where law reports are more frequent.

Each Restatement section includes a black-letter principle, comments, illustrations, and reporters' notes, which provide a detailed discussion of all the cases that went into the principle summarised in that section. By citing a Restatement section in a legal brief, a lawyer may bring to the attention of a judge a carefully studied summary of court action on almost any common law legal doctrine. The judge can then consider the Restatement section and make an informed decision on how to apply it in the case at hand.

While courts are under no formal obligation to adopt Restatement sections as the law, they often do so because such sections accurately restate the already-established law in that jurisdiction. Courts may choose to adopt or cite approvingly Restatement provisions as law, thereby making that provision mandatory authority.

Frequently asked questions