Presidential Power: Changing Medicaid Laws

can the president change medicaid law

While the US President cannot directly change the law of the land, they can issue executive orders that guide and direct federal agency policy and other actions. President Trump has made it clear that he aims to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and impose caps on federal government Medicaid spending. The Trump administration has already approved waivers that restrict eligibility and allow states to charge premiums, and has proposed a rule that would make it harder for states to pay for their share of Medicaid costs. On the other hand, the Biden administration has proposed policies that would expand access to coverage and keep more individuals connected to care.

Characteristics Values
Can the president change Medicaid law? No, but the president can issue regulations, guidance, and executive orders that can guide and direct federal agency policy and actions.
Trump's stance on Medicaid Trump has attempted to reduce spending and enrollment in Medicaid through work requirements, monthly premiums, proposed block granting, and repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Trump's actions on Medicaid Trump has issued executive orders that revoke and replace Biden-era orders related to the implementation of the Medicaid Act and ACA. He has also approved Section 1115 waivers that allow states to implement eligibility restrictions and work requirements for Medicaid.
Impact of Trump's actions Trump's actions have the potential to reduce access to care and worsen the health of Medicaid enrollees. They may also lead to significant cuts to benefits, coverage, and provider payments.

lawshun

Presidential administrations can issue regulations and guidance without legislative changes

Executive orders are written directives, signed by the president, that order the government to take specific actions. They are a way to carry out policy within the rule of law. In the case of Medicaid, the Trump administration's Section 1115 waiver policy emphasized work requirements and eligibility restrictions. These waivers allowed states to condition Medicaid eligibility on meeting work and reporting requirements, and to charge premiums, which could lock out enrollees.

The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires agencies to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking, providing public notice of proposed regulations, allowing comments, and publishing final regulations. This process ensures that the public has fair notice of their obligations.

Presidential administrations can also issue guidance documents, which are internal directives that do not have a substantial future effect on regulated parties. These guidance documents can be used to communicate the administration's priorities and policies without creating legally binding requirements.

It is important to note that executive orders and guidance documents are subject to checks and balances. Congress can enact laws to reverse executive orders, and courts can hold them unlawful if they violate the Constitution or federal statutes.

Trump's Power: Can He Change Laws Alone?

You may want to see also

lawshun

The Trump administration has restricted eligibility and access

The Trump administration has made several changes that restrict eligibility and access to Medicaid. Firstly, they have introduced work requirements and other eligibility restrictions, such as allowing states to charge premiums and lock out enrollees who are disenrolled for unpaid premiums. These changes have made it harder for low-income individuals and families to maintain their Medicaid coverage, and have resulted in many losing their health coverage and access to care.

Secondly, the Trump administration has encouraged states to add complexity to their systems for verifying Medicaid coverage. For example, Idaho previously used a simple process to automatically renew coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries with no income, but the administration informed the state that this process did not comply with federal requirements, leading Idaho to change its verification process and require additional documentation from beneficiaries. This has caused eligible individuals, including children with complex healthcare needs, to lose coverage.

Thirdly, the Trump administration has proposed rules that would make it more difficult for states to pay for their share of Medicaid costs, potentially leading to significant cuts to benefits, coverage, and provider payments. These rules would eliminate some financing options that have long been available to states and would dramatically affect state budgets.

Furthermore, the Trump administration has issued waivers that could harm many people who rely on Medicaid coverage, including those with disabilities, low-income parents and their children, and older adults. These waivers could result in states denying coverage for prescription drugs, imposing higher copayments on people in poverty, and waiving standards for managed care plans. Additionally, capped federal funding could shift financial risk to states, potentially leading to coverage cuts during times of economic hardship.

The Trump administration has also taken actions that specifically impact immigrant families, making it more difficult for them to access Medicaid and other assistance programs for which they are eligible. Overall, the administration's changes to Medicaid have restricted eligibility and access, and have had negative consequences for many vulnerable individuals and families.

lawshun

The Biden administration has improved eligibility and access

The Biden administration has taken several steps to improve eligibility and access to Medicaid. Firstly, they have focused on streamlining the enrollment process by removing bureaucratic obstacles and modernizing the system, making it easier for eligible individuals to apply for, renew, and maintain their health coverage. This includes simplifying the transition process for families moving a child's coverage from Medicaid to the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), ensuring continuous eligibility and reducing barriers to enrollment.

Secondly, the Biden administration has prioritized expanding access to healthcare, particularly for vulnerable populations. They have approved 12-month continuous coverage for children in five states: Colorado, Hawaii, Minnesota, New York, and Pennsylvania. These states will also provide continuous eligibility for individuals leaving incarceration, addressing the unique challenges they face in accessing healthcare.

Thirdly, the Biden administration has promoted the use of telehealth services and encouraged new value-based payment models, building on the expansion of telehealth access during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have also proposed enhancing federal funding to eliminate waitlists for home- and community-based services, strengthening access to critical services offered by Medicaid and CHIP.

Furthermore, the Biden administration has worked to counteract the challenges faced by the Medicaid program during the previous Trump administration. President Trump had sought to reduce spending and enrollment in Medicaid through work requirements, monthly premiums, block-granting, and attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which provides the authority and funding for Medicaid expansion. The Biden administration has rescinded waivers that imposed work requirements and restricted eligibility, instead focusing on advancing access to care and promoting quality of care for Medicaid enrollees.

lawshun

Trump's HAO would have given states flexibility to cover certain adults

During his first term, Trump introduced the Healthy Adult Opportunity (HAO), a demonstration opportunity that would have allowed states to use Medicaid funds to cover certain adults, including those who qualified under the Affordable Care Act's expansion. This would have been done in exchange for annual limits on federal financing.

The HAO would have given states "extensive flexibility" to use Medicaid funds without being bound by federal standards related to eligibility, benefits, delivery systems, and oversight. This would have allowed states to implement changes similar to block grant and per capita cap proposals. However, it is unlikely that states would have opted for such deals if federal financing was significantly cut.

The HAO was designed to give states the tools to design innovative health coverage programs tailored to the unique needs of adult beneficiaries. It aimed to hold states accountable for results while maintaining strong protections for vulnerable populations. States would have had the opportunity to customize the benefit package for those covered and make necessary program adjustments in real time without lengthy federal bureaucratic negotiations or interference.

Trump's HAO was an optional initiative, and only one state, Oklahoma, submitted an HAO demonstration request. This request included a work requirement and other eligibility and benefit restrictions that would have applied to a new ACA expansion adult population. While Trump's administration encouraged and approved Section 1115 waivers that conditioned Medicaid coverage on work requirements, these were later withdrawn by the Biden-Harris administration, which concluded that these provisions did not promote the objectives of the Medicaid program.

lawshun

Trump's executive orders threaten the ACA and Biden's executive orders

While the US President's executive orders cannot change the law of the land or create or rescind regulations, they can signal an administration's intent and guide and direct federal agency policy and other actions.

On his first day in office, President Biden issued Executive Order 13988, directing agencies to review all actions, including regulations, that implement legal protections against sex discrimination. He charged them with assessing and taking necessary actions to fully implement such protections consistent with the Supreme Court's holding that sex discrimination encompasses discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

On the first day of his second term, President Trump issued numerous executive orders, including one that revoked many of President Biden's executive orders. These included several Biden-era orders related to the implementation of the Medicaid Act and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Trump's order directed the Directors of the White House's Domestic Policy Council and the National Economic Council to review and take all necessary steps to rescind, replace, or amend all actions that resulted from the revoked orders.

Trump's executive orders took aim at Biden's priorities, from drug pricing to gender discrimination. Trump revoked several Biden policies aimed at tackling the Covid-19 pandemic and preparing the country for future infectious disease outbreaks. He also revoked orders from Biden to promote protections on the basis of sex and gender identity in schools. Trump rescinded Biden's executive order that led to longer enrollment periods for Affordable Care Act plans in most states and extra funding for third parties that help people enrol in ACA insurance.

Trump's revocation of Executive Order 14009 signals that we could see a number of forthcoming agency actions to undermine the objectives of the Medicaid Act and the ACA.

Frequently asked questions

The president can make changes to Medicaid law through executive orders, which can guide and direct federal agency policy. However, these orders cannot change the law of the land or create or rescind regulations.

The president can make changes to Medicaid administratively without Congress. For example, former President Trump's Section 1115 waiver policy emphasized work requirements, eligibility restrictions, and capped financing.

President Biden has made changes to Medicaid law to expand access to coverage and keep individuals connected to care. His administration has also proposed continuous eligibility policies, which have been shown to lower rates of "churn".

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment