Pursuing Judgeship: Law Degree Essential Or Optional?

While it is generally assumed that judges are trained in the law, this is not always the case. In the U.S., there is no federal requirement for judges to have a law degree, and the requirements vary by state. While 28 states mandate that judges must first be lawyers, 22 states do not require a law degree, though it is an extremely difficult process to become a judge without one. This reality has been criticized for allowing those with power and resources to prevail in legal cases, while leaving those without resources vulnerable.

Federal judges don't need a law degree

Federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges, do not need a law degree. They are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate and are appointed for a life term. While there are no legal requirements, an informal set of criteria has emerged for nominating federal judges. Potential nominees are often recommended by senators or members of the House who are in the President's political party.

In the United States, thousands of people interact with the legal system daily, and it is commonly assumed that judges presiding over their cases will have legal training. However, this assumption does not always hold true, especially in low-level state courts. Data reveals that thirty-two states allow at least some low-level state court judges to serve without a law degree, and seventeen states do not mandate that judges handling eviction cases possess law degrees. This situation disproportionately affects poor litigants, who are often unrepresented in civil legal cases.

While it is technically possible to become a judge without a law degree in 22 states, it is an extremely challenging process that only a handful of people have successfully navigated. In some states, appointed commissions evaluate candidates for judgeships, making it challenging to become a judge without legal expertise. Additionally, both elected and appointed judges are required to complete training programs in every state. These judicial education programs are provided by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) and the American Bar Association (ABA).

The discussion around the qualifications of federal judges is not new. In 1986, Professor Doris Marie Provine addressed the issue of non-lawyer judges in her book "Judging Credentials," arguing against mandating that judges hold law degrees. More recently, the ABA's opinion on a nominee's fitness to serve as a federal judge has carried less weight during confirmation hearings. Senators have voted in favor of appointees that the ABA deemed "not qualified," and the appointment process has been influenced by political considerations.

State requirements vary

In some states, appointed commissions evaluate candidates for judgeships, making it challenging to become a judge without practicing law or demonstrating mastery of it. In other states, the only requirements for government-elected or appointed positions are a certain age (25, 30, or 35) and US citizenship. While federal judges are not required to have a law degree, they are typically well-qualified trial lawyers with judicial experience and a deep understanding of constitutional jurisprudence.

Judicial education programs are provided by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) and the American Bar Association (ABA), and judges in most states are required to continue their education throughout their careers. However, the irregular timing of magistrate training programs can result in magistrates adjudicating cases for extended periods without adequate legal or administrative training.

While it is possible to become a judge without a law degree in some states, it is an extremely difficult process that only a handful of people have achieved.

Judges without degrees and legal rights of the poor

In the United States, judges are not always required to be lawyers. While 28 states in the U.S. require all judges to first be lawyers, 22 states do not. However, even in states where judges are not required to be lawyers, it is extremely difficult to become a judge without legal training or experience.

In 1986, Professor Doris Marie Provine published a book, Judging Credentials, arguing against requiring judges to have law degrees. However, allowing judges to adjudicate without law degrees has been criticized as perpetuating long-standing inequalities in how litigants experience courts, particularly for poor litigants.

In thirty-two states, at least some low-level state court judges are allowed to adjudicate without a law degree. Seventeen states do not require judges who adjudicate eviction cases to have law degrees. This is significant as most poor litigants are unrepresented in civil legal cases, and eviction cases can have a profound effect on poor families.

In some states, appointed commissions evaluate candidates for judgeships, making it very hard to become a judge without practicing law or showing mastery of it. In most states, judges must also complete judicial education programs and continue their education during their careers.

While it is possible to become a judge without a law degree, it is an extremely difficult process. The chances of getting a judge position without a law degree are slim.

Non-lawyer judges: a historical perspective

The notion of non-lawyer judges in the United States is not a new phenomenon. In fact, it dates back to the colonial courts of the seventeenth century, where few judges were lawyers. At that time, justice and religion were linked, and colonists often viewed lawyers with suspicion, seeing them as impious outsiders. This historical context is important to understanding the evolution of judicial qualifications and the ongoing debate surrounding the role of non-lawyer judges in the modern legal system.

In the past, the lack of formal legal education among judges was not uncommon. For example, in the nineteenth century, almost all lawyers studied law through apprenticeship or self-study, and there were very few barriers to entry into the legal profession. This resulted in a significant number of judges, including early Supreme Court justices, lacking formal university training in the law. However, as legal education and bar admission standards became more formalized over time, the expectation for judges to have legal qualifications increased.

Despite the increasing emphasis on formal legal education, the presence of non-lawyer judges has persisted, particularly in low-level state courts. Thirty-two states allow non-lawyers to serve as judges in these courts, and seventeen states do not require judges presiding over eviction cases to have law degrees. This disparity in judicial qualifications across states reflects a complex interplay of historical, social, and economic factors.

The continued existence of non-lawyer judges in certain jurisdictions has sparked debates about the implications for access to justice and equality before the law. Critics argue that allowing judges to adjudicate without legal training undermines the assumption that judges should be impartial and knowledgeable guardians of the law. This is especially concerning in cases involving litigants who cannot afford legal representation, as it may result in an uneven playing field and a potential violation of legal rights.

In conclusion, the historical perspective on non-lawyer judges reveals a dynamic and evolving legal landscape. While the role of non-lawyer judges has diminished over time with the increasing standardization of legal qualifications, their continued presence in specific jurisdictions underscores the ongoing challenges of ensuring equal access to justice and maintaining high standards of legal expertise within the judiciary.

Routes to becoming a judge without a law degree

While it is possible to become a judge without a law degree in the US, it is an extremely difficult process. Twenty-eight states require all judges to first be lawyers, but there are 22 states where this is not a requirement.

Justice of the Peace/Magistrate Judge

In several jurisdictions, including Texas, New Mexico, and some counties in Maryland, you can be a Justice of the Peace or Magistrate Judge without a law degree. However, it is worth noting that these positions often involve more routine tasks, similar to those performed by paralegals, and do not typically involve interpreting the law.

Low-level state courts

Thirty-two states allow at least some low-level state court judges to adjudicate without a law degree. Seventeen states do not require judges who hear eviction cases to have law degrees.

Federal courts

There are no legally established qualifications for justices serving on some federal courts, circuit courts, and district courts.

State-specific routes

In addition to the routes outlined above, there may be state-specific routes to becoming a judge without a law degree. For example, in Georgia, probate judges in counties with populations under 90,000 only need to be US citizens, over the age of 25, with a high school diploma or equivalent. Similarly, in Pennsylvania, magisterial district court judges do not have to take the state's bar exam, but they can only preside over traffic violations, misdemeanour criminal charges, and other low-level cases.

Alternative qualifications

While a law degree is not required in all cases, some form of legal qualification or experience is typically necessary to become a judge. This could include passing the LSAT (Law School Admissions Test) and demonstrating a mastery of criminal law. In some states, appointed commissions evaluate candidates for judgeships, making it challenging to become a judge without legal experience or expertise.

Frequently asked questions