
While it may be possible to sue in-laws for breaking up a marriage, it depends on where you live. Six states in the US allow individuals to sue for alienation of affection: Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah. These lawsuits originate from old English law, where a husband could sue another man for stealing his wife. While the law has evolved to allow women to sue, many have tried to repeal it, arguing that it is antiquated and should be abolished.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Number of states where you can sue for breaking up a marriage | 6 |
| States where you can sue for breaking up a marriage | Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah |
| Basis for suing | Alienation of affection, criminal conversation, seducing spouse, stealing spouse, etc. |
| Requirements for suing | Proof of a happy marriage, third-party involvement, and intent to destroy the marriage |
| Considerations | Cost, emotional impact, likelihood of success, potential financial gain, and personal values |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- In the US, only six states allow lawsuits for breaking up a marriage
- You must prove a happy marriage and that a third party destroyed it
- Adultery is not a crime, but the actions of a third party can be
- The law comes from Old English law when wives were considered property
- It is difficult to win these lawsuits and they are viewed with disfavor

In the US, only six states allow lawsuits for breaking up a marriage
In the United States, marriage and divorce laws are under the jurisdiction of individual state governments. While most states have abolished the law, six states allow lawsuits for breaking up a marriage. These states include Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.
The concept of "alienation of affections" or "criminal conversation" lawsuits originates from old English law, where a husband could sue another man for "stealing his wife". Over time, the legal status of women evolved, and women gained the right to sue third parties who interfered in their marriages. However, as the perception of spousal love as property changed, states began to ban such lawsuits.
To file an alienation of affection lawsuit, one must prove that the marriage was happy, that love existed between the spouses, and that the third party intentionally destroyed the marriage. While some may seek financial compensation or wish to make a statement about the morality of the issue, lawsuits can be challenging to prosecute and may not always be worth the time and effort.
It is important to note that divorce laws vary across the United States, with some states requiring mutual consent for no-fault divorce, while others permit unilateral no-fault divorce. Additionally, a few states have enacted covenant marriage laws, making the divorce process more complex.
Price Gouging Laws: Scarcity's Solution or Hindrance?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

You must prove a happy marriage and that a third party destroyed it
In the United States, suing for alienation of affection is only recognised in six states: Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah. The law allows individuals to sue a third party for ruining their marriages.
To open an alienation of affection lawsuit, you'll need to prove that the marriage was happy and that love existed between both spouses. You must also prove that the third party intentionally destroyed that love and the marriage. It's important to note that the adultery itself is not a crime; rather, it is the actions of the third party that determine whether a law has been broken.
Proving that a third party intentionally destroyed your marriage can be challenging and may require aggravating circumstances beyond the level of malice inherent in ruining someone's marriage. The emotional fallout of infidelity and the legal and emotional process of a potential divorce can further complicate the situation.
While it is understandable to want to strike back at a third party who interfered in your marriage, a long legal proceeding and even potential financial gain may not take away the pain you feel. Ultimately, you may be better served by focusing your time and energy on healing and moving on. The only time suing for alienation of affection may be beneficial is if a divorce due to an affair leaves you financially damaged, and you need the courts to award you monetary compensation to help you survive after the divorce.
Sponsoring Your Father-in-Law: What You Need to Know
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$9.58 $18.99

Adultery is not a crime, but the actions of a third party can be
Adultery itself is not a crime, but the actions of a third party can be. In the United States, laws related to adultery have been struck down in most states to give people more freedom as the times change, especially with the increase in open and polyamorous relationships.
However, six states—Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah—still recognise an antiquated law known as "alienation of affection". This law comes from Old English common law, where a wife was considered her husband's property, and her affection was also considered her husband's property, which could be stolen by another man. The law has since evolved to allow women to sue, and for men to be considered property, too.
To open an alienation of affection lawsuit, you must prove that the marriage was happy, that love existed between both spouses, that a third party destroyed that love, and that they intended to do so. It is important to note that these lawsuits are difficult to win and may not be worth the time and effort unless money is no object or you stand to recover a substantial amount in damages.
While the desire to strike back at a third party who interfered in a marriage is understandable, a long legal proceeding and even potential financial gain will not take away the pain felt in this situation. Instead, it is recommended that individuals focus their time and energy on healing from the emotional pain and moving on.
UN's Environmental Law Enforcement: Effective or Symbolic?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

The law comes from Old English law when wives were considered property
The concept of suing someone for breaking up a marriage, or "alienation of affections", originates from Old English law, when wives were considered the property of their husbands. Under this common-law doctrine, known as "coverture", a married woman's legal existence was merged with that of her husband, and she had no independent legal identity. Any property she owned became her husband's, and she could not make contracts, incur debts, or sue or be sued without his consent.
The perception of wives as property carried over into the legal systems of the United States and other common-law jurisdictions. Initially, only husbands could bring lawsuits for alienation of affections. However, in the 1800s and early 1900s, the legal status of women in the United States evolved from property to person. Women gained the right to sue third parties who interfered with their marriages, and the concept of spousal love as property began to change. As a result, many states started to ban alienation of affection lawsuits.
Today, alienation of affection lawsuits are still permitted in six US states: Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah. To open such a lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that the marriage was happy, that love existed between the spouses, and that the defendant intentionally interfered with the marriage and destroyed the love between the spouses. While these lawsuits can result in substantial monetary awards, they are often criticised as antiquated, difficult to prosecute, and costly for taxpayers.
The Power of MDHHS: Law-Making Authority Examined
You may want to see also

It is difficult to win these lawsuits and they are viewed with disfavor
Although it is possible to sue in-laws for breaking up a marriage in certain states, it is difficult to win these lawsuits and they are viewed with disfavor.
The concept of suing someone for breaking up a marriage stems from old English law, when women were considered property, and a man could sue another man for "stealing" his wife. This law has evolved, and women can now sue as well, but the view of spousal love as property has changed. As a result, many states have banned these lawsuits, and they are now only allowed in a handful of states, including Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.
To win an alienation of affection lawsuit, one must prove that the marriage was happy, that love existed between the spouses, and that the third party intentionally destroyed the marriage and the love between the spouses. This can be challenging to prove, and courts view these types of lawsuits with disfavor. Additionally, these lawsuits can be costly for taxpayers and may not be worth the time and effort unless there is a significant financial gain to be recovered.
While some people may be motivated by the desire to make a statement about the morality of the issue, it is important to consider that a legal proceeding will not undo the emotional damage caused by infidelity. Instead, individuals may be better served by focusing their time and energy on healing and moving on from the situation.
In conclusion, while it is technically possible to sue in-laws for breaking up a marriage in certain states, it is challenging to win these lawsuits, and they are generally viewed with disfavor by courts and society. Other options, such as focusing on healing and moving on, may be more beneficial in the long run.
Martial Law in Canada: Is It Possible?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
In most states, you cannot sue your in-laws for breaking up your marriage. However, six states—Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah—allow individuals to sue for "alienation of affection." This means that you would need to prove that your marriage was happy until your in-law interfered and intentionally caused it to end.
Alienation of affection is a civil tort claim that typically involves a third party interfering in a marriage. It originates from old English law, where a wife's affection was considered her husband's property, and a man could sue another man for "stealing" his wife.
You must prove that your marriage was happy, that love existed between both spouses, and that the third party intentionally interfered and caused the marriage to end. Sex is not a requirement, but rather the focus is on the third party's conduct and its impact on the marriage.
Yes, in some states, there is a common law doctrine known as "breach of marriage promise" that allows individuals to sue for breaking off an engagement. However, due to the evolving nature of marriage and the growing financial independence of women, most states have abolished these types of claims.
These types of lawsuits can be challenging to win and may not always be worth the time, effort, and cost involved. They are often viewed with disfavor by courts and can be emotionally draining. However, if a divorce due to an affair has left you financially damaged, suing for alienation of affection may help you recover substantial damages to support yourself after the divorce.






















