Dred Scott's Decision: Law Or Legacy?

The Dred Scott decision was the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on March 6, 1857, that having lived in a free state and territory did not entitle an enslaved person, Dred Scott, to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that, as someone's property, Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court. The majority opinion by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney also stated that Congress had no power to exclude slavery from the territories, thus invalidating the Missouri Compromise, and that African Americans could never become U.S. citizens. The decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, which abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the United States to be citizens of the United States.

The Dred Scott decision was a landmark ruling by the US Supreme Court

The case reached the US Supreme Court, which ruled against the Scotts in 1857. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority opinion of the Court, which stated that enslaved people were not citizens of the United States and therefore could not expect any protection from the federal government or the courts. The opinion also stated that Congress had no authority to ban slavery from a federal territory. This decision moved the nation a step closer to the Civil War.

The Dred Scott decision is widely considered the worst decision ever rendered by the Supreme Court. It has been cited as the most egregious example in the history of the Court of wrongly imposing a judicial solution on a political problem. A later chief justice, Charles Evans Hughes, famously characterised the decision as the Court's great "self-inflicted wound".

The decision stated that enslaved people were not US citizens and could not expect protection from the federal government

The Dred Scott v. Sandford case was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1857, which ruled that enslaved people were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect protection from the federal government or the courts.

The case was brought to court by Dred Scott, an enslaved Black man, and his wife, Harriet Scott, who sued for their freedom in St. Louis Circuit Court in 1846. They claimed that they were free due to their residence in a free territory (Wisconsin) where slavery was prohibited.

The case was initially in their favour, as courts had ruled this way in the past. However, the case grew in scope and significance as slavery became the most explosive issue in American politics.

On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority opinion of the Court, which stated that enslaved people were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the federal government or the courts. The opinion also stated that Congress had no authority to ban slavery from federal territories.

The decision was considered by many legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the Supreme Court and was overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, which abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the United States to be citizens.

The decision also stated that Congress had no authority to ban slavery from federal territories

The Dred Scott decision was the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on March 6, 1857, that having lived in a free state and territory did not entitle an enslaved person, Dred Scott, to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that, as someone's property, Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court. The majority opinion by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney also stated that Congress had no power to exclude slavery from the territories, thus invalidating the Missouri Compromise.

Taney's opinion was that the Constitution gave Congress the power to make "rules and regulations" for the territories, and to him, a law was not a rule or regulation. Thus, Congress could not make any laws governing the territories, only rules and regulations. He then argued that the Fifth Amendment also forbade Congress from banning slavery at all. The amendment guarantees a grand jury trial in felony trials and protects against self-incrimination during a trial. For Taney's purposes, however, the most important part of the Fifth Amendment is the guarantee of due process law. No citizen shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Based on the assumption that enslaved people were property, Taney argued that banning slavery meant depriving owners of their property without due process of law. This was ironic considering the property at stake here were human beings without a right to due process themselves. If Congress could not ban slavery itself, nor could it give the power to any territorial governments to do so either. Any federal ban on slavery was now unconstitutional. This included the Missouri Compromise. Now, the Wisconsin Territory and the rest of the territory north of 36°30' latitude line, had to allow slavery.

Taney's decision was that the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens. The decision is widely considered the worst in the Supreme Court's history, being widely denounced for its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal reasoning, and crucial role in the start of the American Civil War four years later.

The decision was considered by many legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the Supreme Court

The Dred Scott decision is considered by many legal scholars to be the worst decision ever rendered by the Supreme Court. The decision was made on March 6, 1857, by Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, ruling that Dred Scott, an enslaved black man, was not entitled to his freedom and that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States. The decision was based on the argument that black people were not included and were never intended to be included under the word "citizens" in the Constitution. This decision was reached despite the fact that African Americans could be citizens of a particular state and could even vote in some states.

The Dred Scott decision is considered to be the worst in the Supreme Court's history due to its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal reasoning, and crucial role in the start of the American Civil War four years later. The decision was denounced by legal scholar Bernard Schwartz, who stated that it "stands first in any list of the worst Supreme Court decisions". It was also described by future Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes as the Court's "greatest self-inflicted wound". The decision was also criticised for Chief Justice Taney's poor reasoning, as he ignored precedent, distorted history, and tortured meanings out of obscure clauses.

The decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution

The Dred Scott decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, which abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the United States to be citizens of the United States.

The Dred Scott decision was a landmark ruling by the United States Supreme Court in 1857 that held that the U.S. Constitution did not extend citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges conferred upon American citizens. The decision was widely denounced for its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal reasoning, and role in the start of the American Civil War.

The Dred Scott case involved Dred Scott, an enslaved black man, who sued for his freedom after being taken by his owners from Missouri, a slave-holding state, into Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery was illegal. The Supreme Court ruled against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore could not bring suit in federal court. The Court's decision exacerbated interstate tension and deepened the divide that ultimately led to the Civil War.

Following the Union's victory in the Civil War, the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was passed, which abolished slavery. The 14th Amendment, passed in 1868, guaranteed citizenship for "all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." These amendments nullified the Dred Scott decision and settled the issue of Black citizenship.

Frequently asked questions