The Legal Status Of Immigrants: Lawbreakers Or Law Abiders?

Immigration is a highly contested issue in the United States, with a long history of shifting policies and perspectives. The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, restricted immigration by implementing a literacy test and imposing a national origins quota. This set a precedent for discriminatory immigration policies, which continued with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Immigration Act of 1917, which prevented most non-Northwestern Europeans from entering the country.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, marked a significant shift by abolishing the National Origins Formula and introducing a preference system based on family reunification and labour force needs. This opened entry to immigrants beyond Western and Northern Europeans, altering the country's demographic mix.

Despite these changes, immigration remains a divisive topic, with ongoing debates around illegal immigration and the potential rewards or consequences for those entering the country without authorisation. While some argue that immigrants who break the law should not be rewarded with citizenship, others highlight the complex factors contributing to illegal immigration, such as the termination of the Bracero Program and the limitations imposed on legal immigration from specific regions.

The impact of immigration policies and their unintended consequences have led to a dynamic and evolving landscape, with ongoing discussions about how best to address illegal immigration and the presence of undocumented immigrants in the United States.

Consequences of illegal entry into the US

Illegal entry into the US is a federal crime that carries civil penalties. The consequences of illegally crossing the US border include deportation and bans on re-entry.

First Offense

If a person is caught illegally crossing the US border, they may be imprisoned for up to six months and fined between $50 and $250.

Second Offense

If a person is found re-entering the US illegally, the civil penalty fine is twice the amount of the first fine. The legal penalties of subsequent re-entry include imprisonment for up to two years, a civil penalty fine, or both.

Marriage Fraud

If a person gets married for the sole purpose of evading immigration laws, they may be imprisoned for up to five years, fined up to $250,000, or both.

Entrepreneurship Fraud

If a person fraudulently establishes a business to avoid immigration laws, they may be imprisoned for up to five years, required to pay civil penalty fines, or both.

Re-entry with Additional Crimes

If a person has been deported due to a conviction of three or more misdemeanors, such as crimes involving drugs or other felonies, they may face up to 10 years in prison. If the conviction was for an aggravated felony, the consequences may be up to 20 years in prison.

Nonviolent Offenders

Nonviolent offenders who have been deported before completing their prison sentence may be incarcerated for up to 10 years and made to finish the rest of their sentence without parole.

Long-Term Immigration Consequences

A person who enters the US without permission from US immigration authorities is generally considered "inadmissible". This means that even if they later become eligible for a green card or other immigration status, they would be ineligible to adjust their status within the US.

If a person has already stayed in the US for six months or more without permission, they would be considered to have "unlawful presence", which is a separate ground of inadmissibility.

If a person has been deported due to a conviction for an aggravated felony (other than illegal entry or re-entry), then the improper entry itself is considered an aggravated felony. Having one or more aggravated felonies on their record bars a person from almost all immigration benefits and makes them deportable.

US immigration quotas

US immigration law is based on several principles, including family reunification, admitting immigrants with skills valuable to the economy, humanitarian protection, and promoting diversity. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) allows the US to grant up to 675,000 permanent immigrant visas each year. The INA also sets no limit on the annual admission of US citizens' spouses, parents, and children under 21.

The Immigration Act of 1990 established an annual limit of 700,000 visas for quota-restricted immigrants. This annual limit is divided among certain "preference categories", including family-sponsored immigrants, employment-based immigrants, and diversity immigrants.

The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act) limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the US through a national origins quota. The quota provided immigration visas to two per cent of the total number of people of each nationality in the US as of the 1890 national census. It completely excluded immigrants from Asia.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, abolished the National Origins Formula, which had been the basis of US immigration policy since the 1920s. The act removed de facto discrimination against Southern and Eastern Europeans, as well as Asians and other non-Western and non-Northern European ethnicities, from US immigration policy. It also created a seven-category preference system that gives priority to relatives and children of US citizens, professionals, individuals with specialized skills, and refugees.

The Immigration and Nationality Act's elimination of national and ethnic quotas has limited recent efforts at immigration restriction.

Amnesty for undocumented immigrants

On the other hand, critics argue that amnesty rewards lawlessness and promotes further illegal immigration. They suggest that instead of amnesty, the focus should be on stricter enforcement of existing immigration laws and stronger penalties for those who hire undocumented workers.

Currently, there are no bills or immigration reforms being considered by the U.S. Congress that would provide amnesty for undocumented immigrants. However, there have been historical precedents for amnesty, such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which granted amnesty to undocumented aliens present in the country before January 1, 1982.

The debate around amnesty for undocumented immigrants is complex and multifaceted, and it remains a divisive issue in U.S. politics. While some argue for the humanitarian and economic benefits of amnesty, others emphasize the importance of upholding the law and maintaining control over immigration.

In conclusion, the discussion surrounding amnesty for undocumented immigrants in the United States is a highly contentious issue with valid arguments on both sides. While amnesty could provide a path to legal status and improve the lives of undocumented individuals, it also raises concerns about the potential for increased illegal immigration and the perception of rewarding unlawful behavior. As such, it is a topic that continues to be the subject of intense debate and discussion among policymakers, advocates, and the general public.

US immigration law and its loopholes

US immigration law is a complex area with a long history of reform. The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, restricted immigration to the US through a national origins quota. This was the first widely restrictive immigration law, and it excluded immigrants from Asia. The Act was revised in 1952, and in 1965, the Immigration and Nationality Act (also known as the Hart-Celler Act) was passed, which abolished the National Origins Formula. This removed de facto discrimination against Southern and Eastern Europeans, as well as Asians and other non-Western ethnicities.

Despite these changes, loopholes in the law have been identified and exploited. For example, section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act allowed illegal aliens to undergo visa processing in the US if they paid a $1,000 fine. This was seen as a loophole because it allowed people who had been living in the country illegally to apply for permanent residence without penalty. Another example is the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA), which the Trump administration has described as a "loophole" as it requires unaccompanied children from non-contiguous countries who arrive at the US-Mexico border to be placed with a family member or sponsor within the US.

The term "loophole" implies a level of exploitation, but it is important to note that many people seeking asylum in the US have credible claims. For example, in 2016, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) found that 78% of those citing a "credible fear" of persecution in their home country had legitimate claims. However, the process of seeking asylum is not easy, and those who arrive at the US-Mexico border must first pass a "credible fear" test to determine their eligibility for an asylum hearing.

In summary, while there may be loopholes in US immigration law, the situation is complex, and many individuals and families are fleeing violent and dangerous situations in their home countries.

The impact of immigration on US culture

Immigration has had a profound and ongoing impact on US culture. The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, restricted immigration to preserve the ideal of US homogeneity, favouring Western and Northern European immigrants. This act had a significant impact on the cultural makeup of the US, limiting the number of immigrants from Asia, Southern Europe, and Eastern Europe.

In the mid-to-late 19th century, a large influx of immigration from Asia was witnessed in the Western US, particularly from China, providing cheap labour. During this period, Eastern and Southern European immigrants predominantly settled in the Eastern United States. However, the Immigration Act of 1924 altered this dynamic, restricting immigration from non-Western and non-Northern European countries.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, marked a significant shift in US immigration policy. This act abolished the National Origins Formula, removing de facto discrimination against Southern and Eastern Europeans, Asians, and other non-Western and non-Northern European ethnicities. The act introduced a seven-category preference system that prioritized family reunification and skilled workers, altering the demographic mix in the country.

The impact of these acts and the broader immigration trends they influenced had a profound and lasting impact on US culture. The ethnic composition of the US became more diverse, with increased immigration from Asia, Africa, the West Indies, and Latin America. The percentage of foreign-born individuals in the US grew significantly, shaping the cultural landscape of the nation.

The ongoing evolution of US immigration policies and their impact on immigration trends continue to shape the cultural fabric of the nation. The tension between the ideal of US homogeneity and the recognition of the benefits of diversity remains a central theme in the ongoing dialogue surrounding immigration and its impact on US culture.

Frequently asked questions