Assange's Legal Battle: Did He Break The Law?

Julian Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. He came to international attention in 2010 after WikiLeaks published a series of leaks from Chelsea Manning, a United States Army intelligence analyst. In 2019, Assange was charged with violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and sentenced to 50 weeks in prison. The CFAA is the US government's primary anti-hacking statute, prohibiting unauthorised access to a computer, system, or network.

Assange was accused of conspiring with Manning to try to break the password of a government computer and gain access to its secrets. The indictment did not make clear whether Assange succeeded in breaking the password. Critics have described these charges as an unprecedented challenge to press freedom with potential implications for investigative journalism worldwide.

Assange was incarcerated at HM Prison Belmarsh in London from 2019 to 2024. In 2024, he was freed as part of a deal with the US Department of Justice, pleading guilty to a single count of illegally obtaining and disclosing national security information.

Did Julian Assange break the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act?

Julian Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. He came to international attention in 2010 after WikiLeaks published a series of leaks from Chelsea Manning, a United States Army intelligence analyst.

In 2019, Assange was charged with "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion" under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). This was related to his alleged efforts to help Manning crack a password hash so that Manning could use a different username to download classified documents.

The CFAA is the US federal government's primary anti-hacking statute, prohibiting unauthorized access to a computer, system, or network, and the unauthorized deletion, alteration, or blocking of access to data or information.

The core problem with the CFAA is its lack of clarity regarding what constitutes "unauthorized access" to a computer. Courts across the country have issued conflicting decisions, resulting in varying interpretations of the law. This lack of definitional clarity allows prosecutors to bring felony charges even when the harm caused is minimal or questionable.

Assange's indictment under the CFAA has been criticized as a threat to press freedom and an attempt to punish the publication of information rather than the act of hacking itself. The First Amendment protects the act of publishing information, and Assange's prosecution under the CFAA has been seen as an attack on core political speech.

Assange's defenders have argued that he is a journalist who exposed US military wrongdoing and that his actions did not differ from those of a journalist gathering information. However, the US government has stated that his actions went beyond those of a journalist, amounting to an attempt to solicit and indiscriminately publish classified government documents.

The CFAA charge against Assange has been a contentious issue, with critics arguing that it sets a dangerous precedent for journalism and has potential implications for investigative journalism worldwide.

Did Julian Assange break the law by conspiring to hack a password?

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was charged with "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion" in 2019. This charge was related to his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in US history.

The indictment alleged that in March 2010, Assange conspired with Chelsea Manning, a former US Army intelligence analyst, to assist her in cracking a password stored on US Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNet). Manning, who had access to these computers, was using them to download classified records to transmit to WikiLeaks. Cracking the password would have allowed Manning to log on to the computers under a username that did not belong to her, making it more difficult for investigators to determine the source of the leaks.

During the conspiracy, Manning and Assange engaged in real-time discussions regarding Manning’s transmission of classified records to Assange. The discussions also reflect Assange actively encouraging Manning to provide more information. During an exchange, Manning told Assange that “after this upload, that’s all I really have got left.”, to which Assange replied, “curious eyes never run dry in my experience.”.

Assange pleaded not guilty to the charge and his supporters described him as a journalist who did nothing more than publish leaked information that embarrassed the US government. However, critics have described the charges as an unprecedented challenge to press freedom with potential implications for investigative journalism worldwide.

In 2024, Assange agreed to a plea deal with US prosecutors. He pleaded guilty to an Espionage Act charge of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified US national defence documents in return for a sentence of time served.

Did Julian Assange break the law by publishing classified information?

The question of whether Julian Assange broke the law by publishing classified information is a complex and highly contested one. Assange, an Australian editor, publisher, and activist, founded WikiLeaks in 2006 and came to international attention in 2010 after publishing a series of leaks from Chelsea Manning, a United States Army intelligence analyst. These leaks included footage of a US airstrike in Baghdad, military logs from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and US diplomatic cables.

Assange has been accused of violating US computer hacking laws and was charged with a single felony count of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion. Specifically, he allegedly conspired with Manning to try to break the password of a government computer and gain access to its secrets. However, it is unclear from the indictment whether he succeeded in breaking the password. This charge does not involve publishing classified information, but rather the act of attempting to access classified information.

The publication of the leaks is a separate matter and a highly contentious issue. Assange's actions have been described by some as an attack on press freedom and an attempt to silence whistleblowers. On the other hand, others have argued that he broke the law and endangered lives by publishing classified information. The US government has also accused Assange of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and alleged that he conspired with hackers.

The debate surrounding Assange's actions centres on the question of whether his actions as a publisher and journalist are protected by the First Amendment. Assange's supporters argue that he was engaging in an act of journalism and exposing government wrongdoing. On the other hand, critics argue that he went beyond the actions of a journalist and endangered national security.

The legal proceedings against Assange have been lengthy and complex, involving multiple countries and charges. He spent nearly seven years in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, seeking to avoid extradition to Sweden and the US. He was eventually arrested and spent five years in a British prison before being extradited to the US. In June 2024, he was released as part of a plea deal, pleading guilty to a single count of violating the Espionage Act.

Did Julian Assange break the law by publishing information that endangered lives?

Julian Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. He came to international attention in 2010 after WikiLeaks published a series of leaks from Chelsea Manning, a United States Army intelligence analyst.

In 2019, Assange was charged with "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion" and violating the Espionage Act of 1917. The charges alleged that Assange sought to help Manning crack a password hash so that Manning could use a different username to download classified documents.

Assange's supporters have described him as a journalist who did nothing more than publish leaked information that embarrassed the U.S. government. However, critics have argued that Assange's actions endangered lives and went beyond those of a journalist.

The debate surrounding Assange's actions centres on the question of whether he broke the law by publishing information that endangered lives. On the one hand, it can be argued that Assange, as a journalist, was exercising his right to freedom of speech and exposing government wrongdoing. On the other hand, it has been claimed that Assange's actions went beyond those of a journalist and posed a threat to national security.

The legal implications of Assange's actions are complex and have been the subject of much debate. Some argue that he should be protected under the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Others contend that Assange's actions constituted a criminal conspiracy and posed a risk to national security.

Ultimately, the question of whether Assange broke the law is a matter of legal interpretation and depends on how his actions are defined and prosecuted. While he has been charged and convicted of various crimes, the debate surrounding the ethical and legal implications of his actions continues.

Did Julian Assange break the law by conspiring to recruit hackers?

Julian Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. He came to international attention in 2010 after WikiLeaks published a series of leaks from Chelsea Manning, a United States Army intelligence analyst.

In 2019, the US government unsealed an indictment charging Assange with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion related to the leaks provided by Manning. In 2020, the US government unsealed new indictments against Assange, charging him with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and alleging he had conspired with hackers.

In 2020, a new indictment was filed alleging that since 2009, Assange had attempted to recruit hackers and system administrators at conferences around the world and conspired with hackers, including members of LulzSec and Anonymous. The indictment also described Assange's alleged efforts to recruit system administrators, Assange and WikiLeaks' role in helping Edward Snowden flee the US, and their use of Snowden as a recruitment tool.

Assange's defenders have responded to US accusations, describing him as a journalist who did nothing more than publish leaked information that embarrassed the US government. However, critics have argued that Assange is not a journalist and that his actions went "way beyond those of a journalist gathering information".

In 2024, following a High Court ruling that granted Assange a full appeal to extradition, Assange and his lawyers negotiated a plea deal with the DOJ. Assange agreed to a plea deal with US prosecutors, pleading guilty to an Espionage Act charge of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified US national defence documents in exchange for a sentence of time served.

Frequently asked questions