Did Lindsey Graham Overstep Legal Boundaries?

In 2020, Senator Lindsey Graham was accused of attempting to interfere with the election certification process in Georgia. The Washington Post reported that Graham had suggested that Georgia's Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, find a way to throw out legal mail-in ballots. Raffensperger was surprised by Graham's idea, which he said would have resulted in the discarding of thousands of legal ballots. Graham denied the accusation, stating that he was simply trying to understand how Georgia's signature verification system worked.

Graham has also been accused of breaking the law in relation to his role in the events of January 6, 2021. In December 2023, the Fulton County district attorney in Georgia opened a criminal investigation into a phone call between Graham and Raffensperger, in which Graham allegedly pressured him to throw out mail-in ballots. In May 2023, the Russian Interior Ministry issued an arrest warrant for Graham for his comments about the war in Ukraine.

Did Lindsey Graham suggest throwing out legal mail-in ballots in Georgia?

In November 2020, Georgia's secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, accused fellow Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of suggesting that he throw out legal mail-in ballots in certain counties. Raffensperger told the Washington Post that Graham, a Trump ally, had asked him if he could discard mail-in ballots in parts of the state where there were unusually high rates of signature verification problems. Graham later disputed this characterisation of the conversation, saying he was simply trying to understand how Georgia's verification system works.

Raffensperger, who defended the state's electoral process, said he was surprised and "stunned" by the idea, which would have resulted in thousands of legal ballots being thrown away. He told CNN that it was an "implication of, 'Look hard and see how many ballots you could throw out'".

Voting rights and ethics groups condemned Graham's comments, with some calling for his resignation as chair of the Senate judiciary committee. Noah Bookbinder, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said: "Not only is it wrong for Senator Graham to apparently contemplate illegal behavior, but his suggestion undermines the integrity of our elections and the faith of the American people in our democracy. Under the guise of rooting out election fraud, it looks like Graham is suggesting committing it."

The accusation came as Trump refused to accept results showing Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 presidential election, blaming fraud and irregularities. Georgia is usually a reliably Republican state, but Biden won by around 14,000 votes, triggering a recount. The recount was expected to affirm Biden's win, but Trump and his allies continued to push baseless claims of voter fraud.

Graham told reporters he had also spoken to election officials in Arizona and Nevada, but those secretaries denied this, and Graham later said he had spoken to the governor of Arizona and no official in Nevada. In February 2021, it was reported that the Fulton County district attorney was examining Graham's phone call to Raffensperger as part of a criminal investigation into possible efforts to illegally overturn Georgia's election results.

Did Lindsey Graham break the law by supporting Donald Trump's claims of election fraud?

In the wake of the 2020 election, Senator Lindsey Graham supported former President Donald Trump's claims of election fraud. While Trump's claims were baseless, Graham's support for them was not illegal.

Graham, a Republican senator from South Carolina, has been a staunch ally of Trump's since 2017. In the days following the 2020 election, Graham told Trump not to concede and opposed Republican efforts to establish a commission to investigate fraud in the 2020 presidential elections. He also said that he would support Trump's reelection in 2020.

However, by the night of the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol, Graham said that Biden had been lawfully elected. He also opposed Trump's warning that Congress members who served on the House select committee investigating the Capitol riot "should go to jail."

While Graham's support for Trump's election fraud claims may have been politically and morally dubious, it was not illegal.

Did Lindsey Graham break the law by opposing the Jan 6 committee?

On December 15, 2024, Senator Lindsey Graham opposed Donald Trump's warning that Congress members who served on the House Select Committee investigating the U.S. Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, should be jailed. Graham, a South Carolina Republican, voted to certify the 2020 election results but also voted to acquit Trump during his second impeachment and voted against commissioning the January 6 committee.

When asked during a "lightning round" by NBC News host Kristen Welker if he agreed with Trump's statement, Graham, a Trump ally, said "no." Trump had made the remarks during his first major network interview since winning the election, telling Welker that Representative Liz Cheney, Representative Bennie Thompson, and "everybody on that committee... should go to jail."

The House Select Committee was a bipartisan investigative committee chaired by Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat. Then-Representatives Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, both staunch critics of Trump, were the only Republicans to serve on the committee. The committee's work led to the U.S. Department of Justice criminally charging Trump in connection with the Capitol riot.

Trump has maintained his innocence, saying the case was politically motivated and that the committee lied and destroyed evidence. He has also promised to pardon those charged with crimes related to January 6.

While Graham largely supports Trump's agenda, he broke from the president-elect on this issue. Although he may not have supported the committee, Graham made clear that he did not believe they deserved jail time for carrying out their duties to investigate the attack on the Capitol.

Graham's response to Welker's question offered an example of his occasional willingness to publicly disagree with Trump while still serving as a staunch ally.

Did Lindsey Graham break the law by supporting Trump's secretary of defense pick despite sexual assault allegations?

In December 2024, Senator Lindsey Graham supported President-elect Donald Trump's pick for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, despite sexual assault allegations against him. Graham said that Hegseth told him he would release the accuser from a non-disclosure agreement, allowing her to speak publicly about the allegations. Graham compared the situation to that of Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation, where he claimed the allegations weren't substantiated. Graham indicated that he was prepared to support Hegseth's confirmation, saying, "I'm in a good place with Pete, unless something I don't know about comes out."

While Graham's support for Hegseth amid the allegations may have sparked controversy and drawn criticism, it is important to note that he did call for the accuser to be able to speak publicly and encouraged her to come forward. However, it is unclear if Graham's actions broke the law. To determine whether a law was broken, a legal analysis and investigation into the specific circumstances would be required, which is beyond the scope of this response.

Did Lindsey Graham break the law by calling for a military invasion of Venezuela?

In May 2019, Senator Lindsey Graham called for a military invasion of Venezuela to overthrow Nicolás Maduro amid the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Graham, a former presidential candidate and a member of the Republican Party, advocated for military action in Venezuela, comparing it to the U.S. invasion of Grenada in 1983. He argued that the goal was "to restore order" and get Cuba out of Venezuela. Graham's statements were specific and marked the first time a sitting member of Congress had called for military action in Venezuela.

While Graham's comments sparked debate and drew criticism from some, it is unclear if he broke the law with his statements. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech, and it is common for politicians to express their opinions on foreign policy matters, even if they are controversial. However, there are limits to free speech, and inciting violence or threatening national security may cross the line. In this case, Graham's statements did not explicitly call for violence or break any specific laws.

It is worth noting that as a U.S. senator, Graham does have a role in shaping foreign policy and can influence decisions about military action. His comments reflected his support for an aggressive interventionist foreign policy, which he has advocated for in the Senate.

In conclusion, while Lindsey Graham's call for a military invasion of Venezuela may have been controversial, it is unlikely that he broke the law with his statements. His comments fell within the realm of political discourse and did not cross into illegal territory.

Frequently asked questions