Bashir's Law: Crossing Lines In Journalism

In 1995, Martin Bashir interviewed Diana, Princess of Wales, for the BBC's Panorama programme. The interview was heralded as a journalistic scoop at the time, but it was later revealed that Bashir had used deception and forgery to secure it. An investigation in 1996 cleared Bashir of any wrongdoing, but in 2020, following campaigning by Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, the BBC launched a new independent inquiry. This inquiry found Bashir guilty of deceit and breaching editorial conduct, and he resigned from the BBC, citing health reasons. However, despite the unethical methods used, the Metropolitan Police decided not to pursue a criminal investigation, concluding that no criminal offence had been committed.

Martin Bashir's use of forged bank statements

In 1995, Martin Bashir interviewed Diana, Princess of Wales, for the BBC's Panorama programme. The interview was a huge scoop for the BBC, and it catapulted Bashir, a little-known reporter, to global fame. However, it was later revealed that Bashir had used forged bank statements to gain access to the princess.

Bashir first made contact with Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, and falsely told him that he had spent three months investigating the press's behaviour towards Diana. He also claimed to have important information to reveal, including that Diana's former head of security, Alan Waller, was being paid by News International and UK intelligence services to spy on her and the Spencer family. To support these claims, Bashir showed Earl Spencer forged bank statements that appeared to show payments from News International and Penfolds Consultants, a front for intelligence services.

Earl Spencer has stated that if he had not seen these bank statements, he would not have made the introduction, and the interview would never have happened. He also claimed that the false documents led Diana to believe that associates of the Royal Family were selling stories about her to the media.

In 1996, the BBC conducted an internal investigation, led by then-director of news Tony Hall, which cleared Bashir and the BBC of any wrongdoing. However, this investigation was later criticised as woefully ineffective by Lord Dyson, who led a subsequent independent inquiry in 2020.

In May 2021, Dyson's inquiry found Bashir guilty of using "deceitful methods" and breaching BBC editorial conduct to obtain the interview. The inquiry concluded that Bashir had acted inappropriately and in serious breach of the 1993 edition of the Producers' Guidelines on straight dealing. Bashir resigned from the BBC that same month, citing health reasons.

While Bashir admitted to asking for the bank statements to be mocked up and expressed deep regret for his actions, he maintained that the bank statements had no bearing on Diana's decision to participate in the interview.

The BBC's cover-up of Martin Bashir's actions

The BBC's 1996 investigation failed to interview Earl Spencer, and it did not scrutinise Bashir's account with an adequate degree of scepticism. Furthermore, the BBC gave evasive answers to journalists' questions about how the interview was secured, and the BBC press office described Bashir as "an honest and honourable man".

The BBC's director-general at the time of the 2020-21 inquiry, Tim Davie, acknowledged the organisation's "multiple serious failures", stating:

> "Although the report states that Diana, Princess of Wales, was keen on the idea of an interview with the BBC, it is clear that the process for securing the interview fell far short of what audiences have a right to expect. We are very sorry for this. Lord Dyson has identified clear failings. While today's BBC has significantly better processes and procedures, those that existed at the time should have prevented the interview being secured in this way."

The BBC's cover-up of Bashir's actions has had a significant impact on the corporation's reputation for integrity.

The impact of the scandal on Martin Bashir's career

The scandal involving Martin Bashir's 1995 Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, had a significant and lasting impact on his career. Initially, the interview catapulted Bashir to global fame and won him praise for a major journalistic scoop. He received several accolades for the interview, including a BAFTA Award for Best Talk Show. However, the scandal surrounding the methods used to secure the interview later emerged, tarnishing Bashir's reputation and leading to his resignation from the BBC.

In 1996, an internal BBC investigation cleared Bashir of any wrongdoing, finding that the fake bank statements did not influence Diana's decision to participate in the interview. This initial inquiry was criticised for being ineffective, and Earl Spencer, Diana's brother, never accepted its outcome.

In 2020, new allegations and evidence emerged, prompting the BBC to launch an independent inquiry led by Lord Dyson. This inquiry concluded that Bashir had used deceitful methods and breached editorial guidelines to obtain the interview. The BBC returned the BAFTA Award won for the interview and issued a full and unconditional apology.

Bashir resigned from the BBC in May 2021, citing health reasons. He had been suffering from ill health, including a brain tumour, coronavirus, and heart-related issues. The BBC found him guilty of deceit and breaching editorial conduct. The Metropolitan Police assessed the evidence but decided not to pursue a criminal investigation, concluding that no criminal offence had been committed.

The scandal damaged Bashir's reputation and led to his departure from the BBC. It also raised questions about journalistic ethics and the integrity of the BBC's internal investigations. While Bashir faced scrutiny and criticism, he maintained that Diana was happy with the interview and that they remained close after its airing. He expressed regret for his actions but struggled to admit wrongdoing, stating that he had redeemed himself since the incident.

The impact of the interview on Princess Diana's relationship with her family

Princess Diana's 1995 interview with Martin Bashir for the BBC's Panorama programme had a profound impact on her relationship with her family. The interview, which was watched by nearly 23 million viewers in the UK and an estimated worldwide audience of 200 million across 100 countries, marked a turning point in the already strained relationship between Diana and the royal family.

The interview itself addressed several sensitive topics, including Diana's marriage to Prince Charles, their subsequent separation, and her struggles with bulimia and post-natal depression. Diana also confirmed the accuracy of the "Squidgygate" tapes, denied allegations of having an affair with James Gilbey, and addressed charges of harassing Oliver Hoare. She further confirmed her extramarital affair with James Hewitt and expressed hurt at his cooperation with a book about their relationship.

The interview also had a significant impact on Diana's relationship with her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry. William was reported to have felt a sense of dread upon seeing the interview, while Harry initially refused to watch it. Harry later blamed Bashir for asking invasive questions and held the media and paparazzi partially responsible for Diana's death.

In the years following the interview, Diana's relationship with the royal family continued to be challenging. She faced increased scrutiny from the media and public, with her every move becoming news. She also experienced restrictions on her duties and blocked visits abroad. Additionally, there were attempts to discredit her, such as the release of recorded telephone conversations and allegations of nuisance phone calls.

The interview also had a lasting impact on the public's perception of the royal family. Diana's openness about her mental health struggles and her willingness to meet with vulnerable populations, such as HIV/AIDS and leprosy patients, made her the most relatable royal. She represented a vision of the royals that many felt it could and should be.

Despite the challenges and controversies that arose following the interview, Diana's legacy continued to shape the royal family even years after her death. Her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry, have carried on her charitable endeavours and commitment to vulnerable populations. They have also spoken about the impact she had on them and their desire to carry on her work.

The legality of the methods used by Martin Bashir

Martin Bashir is a British former journalist who, in 1995, conducted an interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, for the BBC's Panorama programme. The interview was highly acclaimed at the time, but it was later revealed that Bashir had used deception and forgery to secure it.

Bashir commissioned fake bank statements, which falsely suggested that members of the royal family were selling stories to newspapers, to gain the trust of Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, and access to the princess. An internal BBC investigation in 1996 cleared Bashir of any wrongdoing, but the inquiry was later criticised for being ineffective and the BBC for allegedly covering up Bashir's actions to preserve the accolades received by the Panorama special.

In 2020, following continued campaigning by Earl Spencer, who never accepted the outcome of the original inquiry, the BBC launched an independent investigation into how Bashir obtained the interview. The inquiry, led by former Supreme Court judge Lord Dyson, found Bashir guilty of using "deceitful methods" and breaching BBC editorial conduct. The BBC issued a "full and unconditional apology" for the way the interview was obtained, and returned the BAFTA Award the programme had won. Bashir resigned from the BBC shortly before the publication of the Dyson report, citing health reasons.

Despite the deceitful methods employed by Bashir, the Metropolitan Police decided not to pursue a criminal investigation, stating that they had not identified evidence of activity that constituted a criminal offence.

While Bashir's actions may not have been illegal, they were certainly unethical and represented a serious breach of journalistic standards.

Frequently asked questions