Martin Luther King Jr.: Civil Disobedience And The Law

Martin Luther King Jr. was a prominent civil rights leader who fought against racial injustice and segregation in the United States. While he is celebrated for his significant contributions to social progress, King's relationship with the law was complex and nuanced.

On one hand, King advocated for the rule of law and sought to advance racial justice through legal reform. He understood that legal change was necessary to address entrenched patterns of inequality and discrimination. However, he also recognised the limitations of the law in bringing about true societal transformation.

King's views on the law can be categorised into two groups: law as an obstacle and law as an opportunity. As an obstacle, King saw how racially discriminatory laws or racially neutral laws were used by segregationists to attack civil rights activism. Southern police arrested civil rights protesters, including King, on various charges such as disturbing the peace, marching without a permit, and violating picketing laws.

King famously addressed the question of when to obey and when to disobey the law in his Letter from Birmingham Jail, differentiating between just and unjust laws. He wrote, A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.

On the other hand, King also recognised the power of law as an opportunity for advancing racial justice. He understood that legal reform was a crucial component of broader social and political struggles. He played a pivotal role in advocating for school desegregation, non-discrimination requirements in public spaces, and voting rights protections.

King's complex relationship with the law reflected his belief that true racial equality required both legal reform and organised social action.

Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested multiple times for breaking various laws

Martin Luther King Jr. was a prominent leader of the civil rights movement and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate who was known for his use of nonviolence and civil disobedience. However, he was arrested multiple times for breaking various laws.

Southern police arrested civil rights protesters, including King, on multiple occasions for violating practically every criminal code provision. These included disturbing the peace, marching without a permit, violating picketing or boycott laws, trespassing, engaging in criminal libel, and conspiracy. King was also prosecuted in Alabama and elsewhere for refusing to disclose the NAACP's membership rolls. He was further charged with tax evasion in Alabama and arrested for parading without a permit, which led to his famous "Letter from Birmingham Jail". In this letter, he differentiated just and unjust laws, stating that a just law is one that "squares with the moral law, or the law of God", while an unjust law is one that is "out of harmony with the moral law".

Despite his arrests, King continued to advocate for the advancement of racial justice through legal means. He understood that court decisions and legal reform were crucial components of broader political and social struggles. He wanted laws that promoted school desegregation, non-discrimination in restaurants, hotels, and private employers, and voting rights protections.

King's complex relationship with the law, seeing it as both an obstacle and an opportunity for racial justice, was a significant aspect of his contributions to American history. His commentaries on the relationship between the law and social justice remain influential today.

He advocated for breaking some laws in the name of civil rights

Martin Luther King Jr. was an American civil rights activist and a prominent leader of the civil rights movement. He is known for his advocacy of nonviolent civil disobedience to bring about social change and challenge racial injustice. While King emphasised the importance of law in advancing racial justice, he also recognised that sometimes breaking certain laws might be necessary in the pursuit of civil rights.

King's views on the relationship between law and social justice can be categorised as "law as obstacle" and "law as opportunity". Under "law as obstacle", King acknowledged that many racially discriminatory laws or racially neutral laws were used by segregationists to hinder civil rights activism. For example, Southern police frequently arrested civil rights protesters, including King, on various charges such as disturbing the peace, marching without a permit, violating boycott laws, trespassing, and conspiracy. King often struggled to justify why civil rights activists were justified in breaking certain laws, even those that did not explicitly mention race, while also condemning segregationists for their defiance of federal civil rights rulings.

In his famous "Letter from Birmingham Jail" in 1963, King differentiated between just and unjust laws. He defined a just law as "a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God", while an unjust law is "a code that is out of harmony with the moral law". Since segregation laws were unjust, King argued that they should be disobeyed because they were morally wrong. He further elaborated that there were laws that were just in principle but unjust in their application, and it was this type of law that led to his arrest for parading without a permit. King explained that while there was nothing inherently wrong with requiring a permit for a parade, using such an ordinance to uphold segregation and deny citizens their First Amendment rights made it unjust.

King's stance on civil disobedience and his differentiation between just and unjust laws reflected his belief in the importance of organised social action alongside legal reform to address entrenched patterns of inequality. He emphasised that legal change alone might not be sufficient to bring about true racial equality, and that African Americans should not get caught up in legalism or lower court battles, as this could distract and prolong the fight for civil rights. Instead, he advocated for direct-action protest as a way to complement and sometimes challenge the law in pursuit of social justice.

Martin Luther King Jr.'s advocacy for breaking unjust laws in the name of civil rights was a pivotal aspect of his civil rights crusade. By refusing to obey immoral laws that contradicted his religious and moral beliefs, King played a pivotal role in challenging racial injustice and advancing the cause of racial equality.

King was a civil rights activist and leader

Martin Luther King Jr. was a prominent leader of the civil rights movement and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate known for his advocacy of nonviolence and civil disobedience. He was an American civil rights activist who played a crucial role in the struggle for racial equality and social justice.

King's views on the law can be categorised into two main groups: law as an obstacle and law as an opportunity. He believed that unjust laws and the courts that enforced them were barriers to achieving racial justice. Southern police frequently arrested civil rights protesters, including King, on various charges such as disturbing the peace, marching without a permit, violating picketing or boycott laws, trespassing, and conspiracy. King often justified the actions of civil rights activists who broke certain laws, even if those laws were racially neutral, while condemning segregationists for defying federal civil rights requirements.

In his famous "Letter from Birmingham Jail," written in 1963, King differentiated between just and unjust laws. He defined a just law as "a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God," while an unjust law is "out of harmony with the moral law." Since segregation laws were unjust, King urged people to disobey them, as they were morally wrong.

However, King also recognised the value of certain laws in advancing racial justice. He understood that court decisions and legal reforms were essential components of broader political and social change. He wanted laws that promoted school desegregation, non-discrimination in restaurants, hotels, and private employers, and voting rights protections. King's attitude towards these civil rights laws was shaped by his tense relationship with civil rights lawyers and his desire to distance himself from the litigation-based tactics of organisations like the NAACP.

King's legacy as a leader and activist has been complicated by allegations of sexual misconduct and his non-orthodox theological views. Despite this, his impact on the civil rights movement and his commitment to truth and equality remain undeniable.

He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize

On 14 October 1964, Martin Luther King Jr. was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his non-violent struggle for civil rights for the African-American population. He was the youngest winner of the prize at the time.

King was a leader of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and was recognised for his commitment to non-violent resistance and civil disobedience in the face of Jim Crow laws and other forms of legalised discrimination. Inspired by Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence, King began his struggle in 1955, urging the US government to declare racial discrimination in the southern states unlawful.

King's non-violent methods were not without opposition, however. Racists responded with violence, and he faced powerful opponents, including the head of the FBI, John Edgar Hoover, who placed him under surveillance as a communist. Despite this, King persevered, and in 1963, he led 250,000 demonstrators in the March on Washington, where he gave his famous "I Have a Dream" speech.

In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, King described the award as a "profound recognition that nonviolence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our time". He went on to discuss ways to overcome racial injustice, poverty, and war. King shared the $54,000 monetary prize with leading civil rights groups, including the Gandhi Society for Human Rights and the SCLC.

The Nobel Peace Prize was a reminder to civil rights workers that "the tide of world opinion is in our favour", and King pledged to "work even harder to make peace and brotherhood a reality".

King was fatally shot in 1968

On April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. was fatally shot at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, at 6:01 p.m. CST. He was rushed to St. Joseph's Hospital, where he died at 7:05 p.m. at the age of 39.

King was in Memphis to support striking African-American city sanitation workers. The workers had staged a walkout to protest unequal wages and working conditions imposed by Mayor Henry Loeb. On the day of his assassination, King was staying in room 306 at the Lorraine Motel. He was on the motel's balcony, leaning over the railing, when he was struck in the face by a single .30-06 bullet fired from a Remington Model 760 rifle. The bullet entered through King's right cheek, breaking his jaw and several vertebrae as it travelled down his spinal cord, severing his jugular vein and major arteries, before lodging in his shoulder.

The shot came from a rooming house across the street from the Lorraine Motel. James Earl Ray, a fugitive from the Missouri State Penitentiary, was arrested on June 8, 1968, at London's Heathrow Airport and charged with the crime. On March 10, 1969, he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 99 years in the Tennessee State Penitentiary. Ray later made many attempts to withdraw his guilty plea and be tried by a jury, but was unsuccessful. He died in prison in 1998.

The King family and others believe that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy involving the U.S. government, the mafia, and the Memphis police. They believe that Ray was a scapegoat. In 1999, the family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Loyd Jowers, who had claimed on national television that he had conspired with the mafia and the government to kill King. The jury concluded that Jowers and others were "part of a conspiracy to kill King" and awarded the family the requested sum of $100 in damages. The allegations were later disputed by the United States Department of Justice due to a perceived lack of evidence.

Frequently asked questions