Nunes' Legal Troubles: Did He Cross The Line?

Devin Nunes, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, has been accused of breaking the law by revealing classified information to the public. In March 2017, Nunes, then-chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, revealed to reporters that he had seen intelligence reports showing that the president-elect, Donald Trump, and his team had been monitored by American intelligence agencies. While Nunes stated that the monitoring was legal, legal experts have questioned whether his actions in disseminating this information were illegal.

Nunes's actions have sparked controversy, with some accusing him of trying to distract attention from investigations into Trump's campaign links to Russia and others calling for an investigation into whether he broke the law. The Espionage Act prevents the disclosure of classified information, and some believe Nunes may have violated this law. However, a spokesperson for Nunes has denied any wrongdoing, stating that he revealed no classified information. The debate over whether Nunes broke the law remains ongoing, with potential implications for free speech and the right to anonymously criticise government officials.

Devin Nunes and the Espionage Act

Devin Nunes, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives and a loyal supporter of Donald Trump, has been accused of potentially breaking the law by disclosing classified information related to intelligence activities. As the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Nunes revealed that multiple Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants had been issued, allowing for the legal surveillance of certain individuals. Legal experts argued that by publicly disclosing the existence of these warrants, Nunes may have revealed classified information, which is prohibited by the Espionage Act.

The Espionage Act of 1917, codified as 18 USC 798, specifically prohibits the disclosure of classified information related to the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government. In his defence, Nunes claimed that he did not divulge any classified information and that his actions were protected by the Speech and Debate Clause. However, legal experts and members of the intelligence community disagreed, stating that the existence of FISA warrants is considered classified information.

The incident in question occurred during the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into possible Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections. Nunes, a staunch defender of Trump, had initially denied any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. However, during the investigation, Nunes held a press conference where he revealed that communications of some members of Trump's transition team may have been "incidentally collected" by intelligence agencies. While Nunes claimed that the surveillance was unrelated to Russia and was legal, he faced criticism for sharing this information with the media and the president before briefing his colleagues on the committee.

The House Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russian interference and the role of the Trump campaign was a highly controversial and politically charged issue. Nunes, as the chair of the committee, played a key role in shaping the investigation and its outcome. His actions and decisions during this process, including the potential violation of the Espionage Act, have been scrutinised and debated by legal experts and politicians. Ultimately, the question of whether Nunes broke the law by disclosing classified information related to intelligence activities remains a matter of legal interpretation and political debate.

Devin Nunes and the First Amendment

Devin Nunes, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, has been involved in several controversies related to the First Amendment. One notable incident involves his lawsuit against Twitter parody accounts, "Devin Nunes' Mom" and "Devin Nunes' Cow," for defamation. Nunes claimed that these accounts defamed him by calling him a "treasonous cowpoke" and alleging that his "boots are full of manure." However, the ACLU intervened, arguing that these statements are protected by the First Amendment as creative expressions of contempt when criticising government officials. The court ultimately dismissed the lawsuit, recognising the right to anonymous speech and the importance of preventing powerful figures from silencing their critics.

In another instance, Nunes faced criticism for his actions during the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. Nunes, who chaired the committee, held a press conference where he revealed that the communications of Trump's transition team were "incidentally collected" by intelligence agencies. Legal experts questioned the legality of Nunes' actions, suggesting that he may have broken the law by disclosing classified information. Specifically, by acknowledging the existence of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, Nunes may have revealed classified information. This incident sparked concerns about the improper disclosure of classified information and the potential violation of the Espionage Act.

Nunes has also been an outspoken critic of certain media outlets, accusing them of exaggerating the threat of COVID-19. He faced backlash for encouraging healthy families to dine in restaurants during the early stages of the pandemic, contradicting the recommendations of public health experts. Additionally, Nunes played a significant role in the Trump impeachment inquiry as the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee. He attempted to identify the whistleblower and promoted conspiracy theories about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 US election.

Devin Nunes and the Trump-Russia investigation

Devin Nunes, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, played a significant role in the Trump-Russia investigation. In March 2017, the House Intelligence Committee, which Nunes chaired, launched an investigation into possible Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.

Nunes, who served on Trump's transition team, was the first leading House Republican to deny that the intelligence community had evidence of contact between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. He rejected calls for an investigation by a select committee, stating that the House should not engage in a "witch hunt" and that "at this point, there's nothing there". Nunes also refused to request Trump's tax returns.

In March 2017, Nunes held a press conference to announce that he had received information that the communications of some members of Trump's transition team, including potentially Trump himself, had been "incidentally collected" by intelligence agencies. He added that it was legal FISA surveillance and unrelated to Russia. However, it was later revealed that it involved Russia and the Trump transition team. Nunes was criticised for sharing this information with the media and the president before briefing his colleagues on the committee.

In February 2018, Nunes publicly released a four-page memorandum alleging an FBI conspiracy against Trump. He subsequently began an investigation of the FBI and the US Justice Department for allegedly abusing their powers to hurt Trump.

Legal experts have questioned whether Nunes' actions in revealing information about FISA warrants broke the law. The Espionage Act (18 USC 798) prevents the disclosure of classified information "concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government."

Devin Nunes and the Trump impeachment inquiry

Devin Nunes, a former member of Congress and CEO of the Trump Media & Technology Group, played a key role in the Trump impeachment inquiry as the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

Nunes was a loyal supporter of Trump and was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by the former president in January 2021. During the impeachment inquiry, Nunes was accused of attempting to identify the whistleblower whose complaint played a part in launching the investigation. He also repeatedly claimed that Ukraine had attempted to influence the 2016 United States presidential election—one of the conspiracy theories related to the Trump-Ukraine scandal.

In November 2019, Rudy Giuliani's associate Lev Parnas said he had helped Nunes arrange meetings with Ukrainian officials to procure politically embarrassing "dirt" on former Vice President Joe Biden. Parnas said he would be willing to testify to Congress about his own role, as well as Nunes's, in the events, which included meeting with disgraced former Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin.

Nunes denied the allegations, saying it was "very unlikely" he had spoken with Parnas. However, text messages later revealed by the House Intelligence Committee showed that Nunes had, in fact, been in contact with Parnas.

Nunes has a history of filing defamation lawsuits, with Twitter, news outlets, and individuals. In December 2019, he sued CNN for alleged defamation, seeking $435 million in damages for their reporting on Parnas's lawyer's statement. Federal judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the suit in February 2021.

Devin Nunes and defamation lawsuits

Devin Nunes, the former US congressman and current CEO of Trump Media and Technology Group, has filed multiple defamation lawsuits. Between 2019 and 2023, Nunes filed at least 11 defamation suits, many of which have been dismissed or voluntarily dropped.

In March 2019, Nunes filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against Twitter, Elizabeth "Liz" Mair, Mair Strategies LLC, and the Twitter accounts "Devin Nunes's Mom" and "Devin Nunes's Cow". The popularity of the defendants' accounts soared, surpassing the number of followers on Nunes's own Twitter account. In June 2020, a judge ruled that Twitter was immune from Nunes's suit under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. In August 2021, the same judge dismissed the second of two suits Nunes had filed against Mair.

In April 2019, Nunes filed a separate $150 million defamation lawsuit against the McClatchy Company and others. The lawsuit was in response to a report by The Fresno Bee, a local paper owned by McClatchy, which mentioned Nunes in connection with a 2015 yacht party that allegedly involved cocaine and prostitution. Nunes claimed the article was politically motivated and improperly linked him to the fundraiser. Nunes withdrew the suit in 2020.

In September 2019, Nunes sued political journalist Ryan Lizza and Hearst Magazines, the publisher of Esquire, alleging that a 2018 Esquire story had damaged his reputation. Lizza's article claimed that Nunes's family had "secretly" moved its dairy operation from California to Iowa in 2007. Nunes did not contest the accuracy of the reporting but claimed that Lizza had fabricated a "secret". The suit was dismissed in its entirety in August 2020 by a Trump-appointed federal judge. In April 2023, a district court dismissed a similar suit filed by Nunes's relatives and the company NuStar Farms.

In September 2019, Nunes sued the Campaign for Accountability (CfA) and the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, alleging that they conspired to hinder his investigation into the Steele dossier. The suit was dismissed in September 2020.

In December 2019, Nunes sued CNN for alleged defamation, seeking $435 million in damages. The lawsuit was in response to CNN's reporting of a statement made by Lev Parnas' lawyer, which connected Nunes to efforts to dig up dirt on Joe Biden in Ukraine. Federal judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the suit in February 2021.

In August 2021, Nunes filed a defamation suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, which was later transferred to the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that several statements made by Rachel Maddow on MSNBC in March 2021 defamed Nunes. In November 2022, Judge Kevin Castel ruled against Nunes on all but one claim, allowing the case to proceed on a single claim.

In November 2022, Nunes filed a defamation suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, alleging that several statements made on CNN in October 2022 were defamatory. The case was dismissed in March 2023 on jurisdictional grounds, and an appeal was denied in May 2023.

In April 2023, Nunes filed a defamation lawsuit against The Guardian, alleging that an article titled "Federal investigators examined Trump Media for possible money laundering, sources say" falsely accused him of engaging in or aiding and abetting money laundering.

Frequently asked questions