Who Broke The Law: Examining Shelley Luther's Actions

Shelley Luther is a Texas salon owner who was sentenced to seven days in jail and fined $7,000 for violating Texas stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Luther's sentence was widely criticised, with many questioning whether she had, in fact, broken the law.

Shelley Luther's violation of a restraining order

Shelley Luther, an American salon owner and politician, was sentenced to seven days in jail and fined $7,000 for violating Texas stay-at-home orders by Judge Eric Moye. Luther had reopened her salon, Salon à la Mode, in April 2020, despite receiving a citation from the Dallas police and a cease-and-desist letter demanding that her business remain closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Judge Moyé's temporary restraining order prohibited Luther from operating her salon while state and local emergency orders closed nonessential businesses. Luther's actions were in direct violation of this order, resulting in her sentence.

The case gained national attention, and Luther became a symbol for conservatives who believed the pandemic restrictions were overreaching. She received significant support from the Republican Party, with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealing to Judge Moyé and stating that he had abused his discretion and should immediately order Luther's release. Dan Patrick, the Texas lieutenant governor, offered to pay Luther's fine and serve her sentence.

Ultimately, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that Judge Moyé’s temporary restraining order was void as it failed to set forth the conduct required and the legal basis for its issuance in clear, specific, and unambiguous terms. As a result, Luther was released from jail after serving three days of her sentence.

Judge Eric Moye's sentencing of Luther

Judge Eric Moyé, a Democrat, sentenced Shelley Luther to seven days in jail and a $7,000 fine for reopening her salon despite the state's stay-at-home orders. Luther reopened her salon on April 24, 2020, and received a citation from police, which she publicly tore up at a protest the next day. Moyé gave Luther the chance to avoid jail time by admitting she was selfish, apologizing, and promising to keep her salon closed, but she refused.

On May 5, 2020, Moyé found Luther to be in criminal and civil contempt of court for her actions in reopening her salon, particularly "the refusal of the defendants to cease operation of the salon, despite the clear and unambiguous language of the order." He described Luther's actions as open, flagrant and intentional and stated that she had expressed no contrition, remorse or regret for their contemptuous action. Moyé told Luther that her actions were selfish and that she could avoid jail time if she showed remorse, closed her salon, and apologized. Luther responded that she could not comply with that request, saying, "I have to disagree with you, sir, when you say that I'm selfish, because feeding my kids is not selfish. So, sir, if you think the law's more important than kids getting fed, then please go ahead with your decision. But I am not going to shut the salon."

After the sentencing, Luther was immediately taken into custody to serve her seven days in jail. Moyé's sentence sparked widespread criticism, including from Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who both called for Luther's release. Abbott later amended his executive orders to remove the possibility of imprisonment as a penalty for violating them, which led to Luther's release after two days.

Moyé has been a judge for over 25 years and currently presides over the 14th Judicial District Court of Texas in Dallas County. He received his law degree from Harvard Law School in 1979 and is a lifelong Democrat. He has served on many Democratic campaigns and is politically active.

Luther's refusal to apologise

Shelley Luther, a salon owner in Dallas, Texas, was sentenced to seven days in jail and a $7,000 fine for violating Texas stay-at-home orders by Judge Eric Moye. Luther had defied the orders by reopening her salon during the COVID-19 pandemic, citing economic concerns as her reason.

Prior to her sentencing, Judge Moye gave Luther the opportunity to apologise and promise not to reopen her salon, stating that she could possibly receive just a fine instead of jail time. However, Luther refused to apologise, stating, "Feeding my kids is not selfish. If you think the law is more important than kids getting fed, then please go ahead with your decision, but I am not going to shut the salon."

Luther's case received national attention and sparked debates about the role of government in restricting businesses during a pandemic. Her imprisonment was characterised by some as a struggle against big government. Luther herself stated that she was not going to back down from a fight, and her refusal to apologise and shut her salon was seen by many as a heroic act of civil disobedience.

After serving two days in jail, Luther was released following an order from the Texas Supreme Court. Her case continued, and she eventually entered politics, running for a seat in the Texas House of Representatives. In 2024, she won the Texas state house election against Democrat Tiffany Drake with over 75% of the votes.

The Supreme Court of Texas's intervention

The Supreme Court of Texas ordered the release of Shelley Luther, who had been jailed for ignoring a temporary restraining order prohibiting her from operating her salon. Luther was sentenced to seven days in jail and a $7,000 fine for contempt of the trial. The intervention by the Supreme Court of Texas came after Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed for her release. Abbott stated that there were "less restrictive means" to ensure public safety than jailing a Texas mother. He further emphasised that he would modify his executive orders to prevent confinement as a punishment for violating them.

On May 7, 2020, the Texas Supreme Court granted temporary relief and ordered Luther's release. The Court's intervention was based on the argument that Luther should be released because the emergency rules were not considered "law". The Court's decision was highly anticipated, as the case had gained national attention and sparked intense debates about the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Luther's imprisonment was criticised by many, including prominent Republican figures.

The Texas Supreme Court's intervention in the Shelley Luther case highlighted the tension between public health concerns and individual liberties during the pandemic. It also brought to light the economic struggles faced by small businesses and their employees, who were severely impacted by the lockdown measures. Luther's case became a symbol of resistance against what some perceived as government overreach during the health crisis.

The Court's decision to release Luther was significant as it underscored the importance of balancing public health measures with the protection of constitutional rights and individual freedoms. It also sent a strong message to government officials and law enforcement agencies, reminding them to exercise their powers judiciously and proportionately, especially during times of crisis.

The legality of the restraining order

Shelley Luther, an American salon owner and politician, was sentenced to seven days in jail and a $7,000 fine for violating Texas's stay-at-home orders. The legality of the restraining order against her is a complex issue that involves the interpretation of emergency regulations, the authority of the government to issue such orders, and the protection of individuals' rights.

On April 24, 2020, Luther reopened her salon, Salon À la Mode, in defiance of local stay-at-home orders. The following day, she received a citation from the Dallas Police and a cease-and-desist letter demanding that her business close. Luther refused and attended a rally protesting lockdowns, where she tore up the cease-and-desist letter. As a result, the local authorities advanced the case, and on April 28, District Judge Eric Moyé was asked to require the business to be closed.

On May 7, the Texas Supreme Court granted temporary relief to Luther and released her from jail. The Court set a schedule of briefings and will issue an opinion on the case. The outcome will have significant implications for the interpretation of emergency regulations and the authority of governments to enforce them.

The Shelley Luther case highlights the complex legal and ethical issues that arise during public health emergencies. It also underscores the importance of balancing public health and safety with individuals' rights and economic concerns. The Texas Supreme Court's decision will be a pivotal moment in this debate and will have implications for similar cases in the future.

Frequently asked questions