Snowden's Exposé: Is Us Above The Law?

Edward Snowden is a former NSA intelligence contractor and whistleblower who, in 2013, leaked highly classified documents revealing the existence of global surveillance programs. Snowden's disclosures revealed numerous global surveillance programs, many run by the NSA and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, in cooperation with telecommunication companies and European governments.

In 2020, a U.S. federal court ruled that the mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal and possibly unconstitutional. The ruling also stated that U.S. intelligence leaders, who publicly defended it, were not telling the truth.

Snowden has been variously praised and condemned for his leaks. He has defended his actions as an effort to inform the public, fuelling debates over mass surveillance, government secrecy, and the balance between national security and information privacy.

Snowden revealed the existence of mass intelligence-gathering surveillance programs run by the US National Security Agency (NSA)

In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed the existence of mass intelligence-gathering surveillance programs run by the US National Security Agency (NSA). Snowden, a former NSA contractor, leaked highly classified information from the NSA, exposing the mass surveillance of Americans' telephone records.

Snowden's revelations sparked a fierce debate over government surveillance, personal privacy, and the power and perils of technology. It also prompted discussions about national security and individual privacy, with Snowden's actions being viewed as a violation of the Espionage Act.

Snowden's disclosures revealed that the NSA was secretly building a vast database of US telephone records, including the who, how, when, and where of millions of mobile calls. This was the first and most explosive of the Snowden revelations published by The Guardian newspaper in 2013.

The NSA's surveillance activities were not limited to telephone records. They also harvested email and instant messaging contact lists, tracked cell phone locations, and accessed data centers of companies like Yahoo and Google. The agency was shown to be targeting charities, allies, and even its own employees for surveillance.

Snowden's actions had far-reaching consequences. He was charged with espionage and fled the country, eventually seeking asylum in Russia. In 2020, a US federal court ruled that the NSA's mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal and may have been unconstitutional.

Snowden's actions also had a lasting impact on laws and policies. In 2015, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act, which prohibited the bulk collection of phone records by American citizens. This was a direct response to Snowden's revelations and an attempt to protect citizens' privacy and civil liberties.

Snowden's actions sparked a debate about national security and individual privacy

Edward Snowden's actions sparked a global debate about national security and individual privacy. In 2013, Snowden, a former NSA contractor, leaked classified documents revealing the existence of global surveillance programs. He exposed the US government's mass surveillance of Americans' telephone records and electronic communications, which was later ruled as unlawful and unconstitutional.

Snowden's revelations fuelled discussions on mass surveillance, government secrecy, and the balance between national security and information privacy. The public became more aware of the US government's cybersecurity initiatives and how they impacted the privacy of individuals, businesses, and foreign governments.

The debate surrounding Snowden's actions divided opinions. Some supporters viewed him as a hero and a whistleblower, while others criticised him as un-American and a traitor. Snowden himself defended his actions as an effort to inform the public about government activities that infringed on their privacy and civil liberties.

The consequences of Snowden's disclosures were far-reaching. They prompted legal and political actions, with the US government filing criminal charges and a civil lawsuit against him. Additionally, Snowden's actions influenced the development of new products and services that addressed privacy concerns, such as encryption technologies.

The impact of Snowden's revelations extended beyond the US. They sparked a global conversation about the right to privacy and prompted other countries to re-evaluate their data protection laws and their relationships with US intelligence agencies.

Overall, Snowden's actions ignited a debate that continues to shape policies and perceptions surrounding national security and individual privacy.

Snowden's disclosures revealed numerous global surveillance programs, many run by the NSA and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance

Edward Snowden's disclosures revealed numerous global surveillance programs, many run by the US National Security Agency (NSA) and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. The Five Eyes is an intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Snowden's revelations exposed the NSA's mass collection of electronic data on American citizens. The NSA was shown to be secretly accessing the data centres of Yahoo and Google, collecting information from hundreds of millions of account holders worldwide. The agency was also found to be monitoring the online sexual activity of people they termed "radicalizers" to discredit them.

Snowden's leaks revealed the existence of PRISM, a program that allowed for direct access to data on the servers of Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, and Apple. Another program, Boundless Informant, involved the NSA collecting millions of Americans' phone records daily.

Snowden also exposed the NSA's cooperation with telecommunication companies and European governments. In addition, he revealed that the NSA was working with the security agencies of EU states to "get access to as much data of EU citizens as possible."

Snowden's actions were deemed illegal by a US court

In 2013, Edward Snowden exposed the mass surveillance of Americans' telephone records by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and the U.K.'s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). Snowden's actions revealed that the NSA was secretly building a vast database of U.S. telephone records—the who, the how, the when, and the where of millions of mobile calls.

Snowden's actions were deemed illegal by a U.S. court, and he was charged with espionage and theft of government property. In September 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the NSA's warrantless telephone dragnet violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and may have been unconstitutional. The court also found that U.S. intelligence leaders who defended the program were not truthful.

Snowden's actions sparked a debate between his supporters and detractors. Some view him as a hero and a whistleblower, while others criticize him as un-American and a traitor. Snowden himself believes that his disclosures had a positive impact and that the world is now safer due to the revelations about mass surveillance.

In addition to the criminal charges, Snowden also faced a civil lawsuit filed by the United States in September 2019. The lawsuit alleged that Snowden violated non-disclosure agreements with the CIA and NSA by publishing a book, "Permanent Record," and giving public speeches without prior approval from the agencies. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled in favor of the United States, ordering Snowden to relinquish unlawful financial gains exceeding $5.2 million.

The case of Edward Snowden highlights the complex nature of balancing national security and privacy rights, with ongoing legal and ethical debates surrounding his actions.

Snowden's actions were deemed unconstitutional by a US court

In 2013, Edward Snowden, a former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), revealed the existence of previously classified mass intelligence-gathering surveillance programs run by the NSA and the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). Snowden's actions led to a range of responses, with some praising him as a hero and others criticising him as un-American.

Snowden's revelations sparked a debate about the legality and ethical implications of mass surveillance programs. In September 2020, an appeals court ruled that the NSA's warrantless telephone dragnet that collected millions of Americans' telephone records was unlawful and may have been unconstitutional. This ruling vindicated Snowden's decision to expose the program, as he had argued that it violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

While Snowden's actions sparked a broader conversation about government surveillance and transparency, they also had legal consequences for him personally. Snowden was charged with espionage by the US government and fled the country, eventually seeking refuge in Russia. In September 2019, the US filed a lawsuit against Snowden, alleging that he violated non-disclosure agreements with the CIA and NSA by publishing a book and giving public speeches on intelligence-related matters without prior approval.

In December 2019, a US District Court found in favour of the US government, holding that Snowden breached his contractual and fiduciary obligations. The court ordered Snowden to pay over $5.2 million in damages, representing the monetary gains from his book and speeches.

While the civil lawsuit focused on Snowden's breach of contract, he still faces separate criminal charges for his alleged disclosures of classified information. Despite this, Snowden remains confident that his actions had a positive impact, stating in a 2019 interview that "we live in a better, freer and safe world because of the revelations of mass surveillance."

Frequently asked questions