Vagrancy Laws: Southern Whites And Their Exemptions

Vagrancy laws, which originated in 16th-century England, were used in the post-Civil War South to control and criminalise the freedom of African Americans. Although the laws were race-neutral, they were applied with racial bias by an all-white police force and militia. Vagrancy was broadly defined as wandering about without proper means of livelihood, and those arrested were forced into unpaid labour. Although vagrancy laws were eventually invalidated during the Civil Rights era, the association of blackness with criminality persists today.

The historical context of Southern vagrancy laws

The Black Codes were enacted to restrict the freedom and mobility of Black Americans, as well as their political and economic power. They were designed to force Black Americans to work for white employers on unfair terms, with little to no wages. Vagrancy laws, which were a central element of these codes, allowed local authorities to arrest freed Black people for minor infractions and commit them to involuntary labour. This period marked the start of the convict lease system, described as "slavery by another name".

The historical context also includes the broader legal landscape of the time. Since the colonial period, colonies and states had passed discriminatory laws against free Black people, often included in "slave codes". These laws aimed to suppress the influence of free Black people and preserve slavery. Examples of restrictions include the denial of the right to bear arms, gather in groups for worship, and learn to read and write.

Additionally, it is important to note that similar discriminatory laws existed in Northern states before the Civil War. While some Northern states repealed these laws following the war, others continued to discourage free Black people from residing within their borders.

The Southern vagrancy laws and Black Codes were met with outrage in the North, as they were seen as an attempt to negate the results of the Civil War and maintain white supremacy. This outrage contributed to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Second Freedmen's Bureau Bill by Congress.

The role of the Freedmen's Bureau

The Freedmen's Bureau was established by an act of Congress on March 3, 1865, two months before Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union's Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, effectively ending the Civil War. It was intended as a temporary agency to last the duration of the war and one year afterward, and was placed under the authority of the War Department. The majority of its original employees were Civil War soldiers.

The Bureau provided food, housing, and medical aid, established schools, and offered legal assistance. It also attempted to settle former slaves on land confiscated or abandoned during the war. However, the Bureau was prevented from fully carrying out its programs due to a shortage of funds and personnel, along with the politics of race and Reconstruction.

The Bureau's mission was further complicated by the fact that even among the agency's supporters in Congress and its personnel, there was disagreement over what type of assistance the government should provide and for how long.

During its years of operation, the Freedmen's Bureau fed millions of people, built hospitals, provided medical aid, negotiated labor contracts for ex-slaves, and settled labor disputes. It also helped former slaves legalise marriages and locate lost relatives, and assisted Black veterans.

The Bureau was also instrumental in building thousands of schools for Blacks and helped to found colleges such as Howard University in Washington, D.C., Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee, and Hampton University in Hampton, Virginia. The Bureau frequently worked in conjunction with the American Missionary Association and other private charity organisations.

Additionally, the Bureau tried, with little success, to promote land redistribution. However, most of the confiscated or abandoned Confederate land was eventually restored to the original owners, so there was little opportunity for Black land ownership, which was seen as a means to success in society.

In the summer of 1872, Congress, responding in part to pressure from white Southerners, dismantled the Freedmen's Bureau. Since that time, historians have debated the agency's effectiveness. A lack of funding, coupled with the politics of race and Reconstruction, meant that the Bureau was not able to carry out all of its initiatives, and it failed to provide long-term protection for Blacks or ensure any real measure of racial equality.

How vagrancy laws were used to control Black Americans

Vagrancy laws were used to control Black Americans in several ways.

In the South, vagrancy laws were part of a larger set of laws called Black Codes, which were used to restrict the freedom of Black people and compel them to work for low or no wages. These laws were passed by Southern states in 1865 and 1866 after the Civil War. Black Codes were modelled after earlier slave codes and were part of a pattern of Democrats trying to maintain political dominance and suppress the newly emancipated African Americans.

The defining feature of the Black Codes was a broad vagrancy law, which allowed local authorities to arrest freedpeople for minor infractions and commit them to involuntary labour. Vagrancy laws criminalised men who were out of work or who were not working at a job recognised by whites. Failure to pay certain taxes or comply with other laws could also be construed as vagrancy. Vagrancy laws were also used to specifically target unemployed Black people.

In addition to vagrancy laws, Black Codes included apprentice laws, which made Black orphans and dependents available for hire to whites, and commercial laws, which excluded Black people from certain trades and businesses and restricted their ownership of property.

The Black Codes outraged public opinion in the North, as they seemed to be creating a form of quasi-slavery to negate the results of the Civil War. This led to the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Second Freedmen's Bureau Bill.

Vagrancy laws remained in force in the South until the Supreme Court's Papachristou v. Jacksonville decision in 1972.

The impact of vagrancy laws on the post-Civil War South

Vagrancy laws, which originated in 16th-century England, were used in the post-Civil War South to control and suppress the freedom of African Americans. Although vagrancy may seem race-neutral on the surface, it was applied in a way that disproportionately affected African Americans. This was due to the racial prejudice that associated black people with criminality and the fact that the newly freed slaves were unemployed and homeless.

In the post-Civil War South, vagrancy laws were used to force unemployed African Americans into unpaid labour on plantations. This was known as "slavery by another name". The Black Codes, passed by Southern states in 1865 and 1866, restricted the freedom of African Americans and compelled them to work for low or no wages. These laws required all African Americans, whether previously free or enslaved, to sign annual labour contracts with white employers. If they did not, or if they did not fulfil the terms of these contracts, they were deemed vagrants and fined, imprisoned, or forced into unpaid labour.

The Freedmen's Bureau, which was created to assist former slaves, also used vagrancy laws to do the bidding of white planters. They authorized patrols that arrested black people indiscriminately and delivered them to white employers for bounties. This was justified by the belief that African Americans were lazy and would not work unless physically compelled.

Vagrancy laws in the post-Civil War South had a lasting impact on the racial justice system and perpetuated the racial inequality that exists today. It took until the Civil Rights era, about 100 years later, for most of these laws to be invalidated.

The legacy of vagrancy laws in the US

Vagrancy laws, which originated in 16th-century England, were introduced in the US by colonists and remained in force until the 1970s. These laws, which criminalised poverty and idleness, were used to control the lives of Black Americans in the South following the Civil War.

In the post-bellum period, hundreds of thousands of African Americans, many of them recently emancipated, were displaced and searching for work and family members. Southern lawmakers responded by passing Black Codes, which severely restricted the freedom of Black people. These laws required all Black people, whether free or enslaved before the Civil War, to sign annual labour contracts with white employers. Those who did not do so, or who failed to fulfil the terms of these contracts, were deemed vagrants and fined or imprisoned. Vagrancy laws were also used to prevent Black people from assembling in groups, bearing arms, learning to read and write, and exercising free speech.

Although the Black Codes were negated by the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction, similar laws targeting Black Americans were enacted as the Reconstruction period ended. New vagrancy laws once again criminalised unemployment, and other statutes allowed for harsh punishments for even minor crimes. These laws were enforced in racially biased ways, as the police and judicial system targeted Black Americans.

In the 1960s, many of those who had been the targets of vagrancy repression began to mobilise. Beats, hippies, Communists, Vietnam War protestors, racial minorities, civil rights activists, and gays organised, asserted their rights, and brought constitutional challenges to vagrancy laws. Arrests of civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. for vagrancy brought the issue to the attention of the civil rights movement. In 1972, the US Supreme Court invalidated vagrancy laws, ruling that they were too vague to be understood.

Frequently asked questions