The Lovings' Law: A Civil Rights Landmark

In 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving, a white man and a woman of mixed Black and Native American ancestry, were married in Washington D.C. where interracial marriage was legal. However, when they returned to their home state of Virginia, they were arrested and charged with violating Virginia's Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which criminalized marriage between people classified as white and coloured. The Lovings were sentenced to prison, but their sentence was suspended on the condition that they leave the state and not return. Did the Lovings break the law?

The Lovings' arrest and conviction

The arrest and conviction of Richard and Mildred Loving was a result of their violation of Virginia's Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which criminalized marriage between people classified as "white" and people of color. The couple, a white man and a Black woman, had travelled to Washington D.C. in June 1958 to marry, as interracial marriage was illegal in their home state of Virginia.

However, upon their return to their hometown of Central Point, Virginia, just a few weeks after their wedding, they were arrested by the local sheriff in the early hours of July 11, 1958. The police had hoped to find them having sex, as interracial sex was also illegal in Virginia at the time. When the police found the Lovings sleeping in their bed together, Mildred pointed out their marriage certificate on display in the bedroom, to which the police responded that the certificate was not valid in Virginia.

The Lovings were charged under two sections of the Virginia Code: Section 20-58, which prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia, and Section 20-59, which classified miscegenation as a felony, punishable by a prison sentence of between one and five years. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to "cohabiting as man and wife, against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth". They were sentenced to one year in prison, but the sentence was suspended on the condition that the couple leave Virginia and not return together for at least 25 years.

The Lovings moved to Washington D.C. following their conviction, but they longed to return to their families in Virginia. In 1963, Mildred Loving wrote a letter to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, who referred her to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU took on their case and filed a motion to vacate the conviction and set aside the sentences, arguing that the Virginia miscegenation statutes violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The motion was denied by Judge Leon M. Bazile, who defended the state's anti-miscegenation laws and the separation of races.

The case eventually made its way to the United States Supreme Court, which, on June 12, 1967, ruled unanimously in favor of the Lovings. The Court found that Virginia's Racial Integrity Act violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the freedom to marry is a fundamental constitutional right. The Supreme Court's decision overturned the Lovings' conviction and struck down Virginia's anti-miscegenation law, ending race-based legal restrictions on marriage across the United States.

The Lovings' appeal

The Lovings' case, Loving v. Virginia, was a landmark civil rights decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Lovings' successful appeal ended all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States.

> Tell the Court I love my wife and it is just not fair that I cannot live with her in Virginia.

The unanimous decision by the Supreme Court justices found that Virginia's interracial marriage law violated the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote:

> Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the state.

The ruling not only overturned the Lovings' 1958 criminal conviction but also struck down existing laws against interracial marriage in 16 U.S. states, including Virginia. The decision forced the 16 states which still had anti-miscegenation laws to erase them, dealing a major blow to segregation.

The Supreme Court's ruling

> "nor shall any State... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The Court rejected Virginia's argument that the Act did not violate the Equal Protection Clause because it \"equally burdened\" both whites and non-whites. The Court found that the law was based solely on "distinctions drawn according to race" and thus violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Court also ruled that the Act violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as the freedom to marry is a fundamental constitutional right.

The impact of the ruling

The unanimous ruling in Loving v. Virginia had a profound and wide-ranging impact. Firstly, it directly overturned the Lovings' 1958 criminal conviction and ended their exile from their home state of Virginia. It also struck down Virginia's Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which had made marriage between whites and non-whites a crime. In addition, the ruling invalidated laws against interracial marriage in 15 other states, bringing an end to all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States.

The ruling was a watershed moment in the dismantling of 'Jim Crow' race laws and a significant blow to segregation. It affirmed the freedom to marry as a fundamental civil right and established that marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man' under the Fourteenth Amendment. This had the effect of classifying marriage as one of the fundamental rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

The case also set a precedent that was later cited in rulings on same-sex marriage. For instance, in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), the Supreme Court invoked Loving v. Virginia as precedent for its holding that states are required to allow same-sex marriages under both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Constitution.

The anniversary of the ruling, June 12, has become known as Loving Day, an annual unofficial celebration of interracial marriages.

The legacy of the case

The case of Loving v. Virginia is considered one of the most significant legal decisions of the civil rights era. The ruling by the Supreme Court not only ended the Lovings' legal battle, but also struck down laws against interracial marriage in 16 states, including Virginia. This unanimous decision forced the remaining 16 states with anti-miscegenation laws to remove them, marking a turning point in the fight against segregation.

Despite the Supreme Court's ruling, some states were slow to alter their laws. Alabama was the last state to officially accept the ruling, removing an anti-miscegenation statute from its state constitution in 2000. This demonstrates the lasting impact of the case, as it took over three decades for all states to officially comply with the ruling.

The case also had implications beyond interracial marriage. Loving v. Virginia was invoked in subsequent court cases concerning same-sex marriage. For example, in the 2015 Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalised gay marriage across the United States, Justice Anthony Kennedy cited the Loving case in his opinion. Additionally, in 2013, the case was cited as a precedent in federal court decisions that held restrictions on same-sex marriage as unconstitutional.

The legacy of Loving v. Virginia is also seen in the annual celebration of Loving Day on June 12th, the anniversary of the decision. This day commemorates multiracial families and aims to build multicultural communities. Furthermore, the story of Richard and Mildred Loving has been immortalised through numerous books and films, ensuring that their courageous fight for love and equality continues to inspire future generations.

Frequently asked questions