Trump's Comey Firing: Lawful Or Unlawful?

On May 9, 2017, US President Donald Trump fired James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This move raised questions about whether Trump broke the law, particularly in light of Comey's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections and alleged collusion with Trump's campaign. While Trump had the authority to dismiss Comey, the firing may have constituted obstruction of justice if it was carried out with corrupt intentions. However, proving obstruction of justice is challenging as it requires demonstrating the specific intent behind Trump's decision to terminate Comey.

Trump's firing of Comey could be an obstruction of justice

Trump's Firing of Comey: A Possible Obstruction of Justice?

On May 9, 2017, US President Donald Trump fired James Comey, the seventh director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This dismissal raised questions about the possibility of political interference by Trump in an existing investigation by a leading law enforcement agency. While Trump had the legal authority to fire Comey, the context and consequences of this decision have led to speculations about a potential obstruction of justice.

The Context of Comey's Firing

At the time of his dismissal, Comey was overseeing the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections and possible collusion with Trump's presidential campaign. Comey had been criticized for his handling of the investigation, and Trump expressed frustration with Comey's refusal to publicly confirm that he was not personally under investigation. Trump also criticized Comey for his handling of the Hillary Clinton email controversy, an investigation that had impacted the 2016 election.

In the days following Comey's firing, Trump gave various explanations for the dismissal, including criticism of Comey's leadership and performance, and the recommendation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. However, these explanations were inconsistent and contradicted by his staff, raising suspicions about the true motives behind the firing.

Obstruction of Justice Considerations

Obstruction of justice is a complex legal concept that criminalizes actions impeding official investigations. While some examples are specific, such as destroying evidence, broad prohibitions also exist. Section 1512 of Title 18, for instance, makes it a crime to "obstruct, influence, or impede any official proceeding," even if the proceeding was not pending at the time.

Legal experts note that while firing an investigator could theoretically fall under obstruction of justice, proving it in this case would be challenging. The main obstacle lies in establishing Trump's mental state and specific intent, as courts require proof of corrupt intentions for an obstruction of justice charge.

The Aftermath of Comey's Firing

The firing of Comey had significant repercussions. Comey asked a friend to share excerpts from memos he had written as FBI Director, recounting private conversations with Trump. In these conversations, Comey alleged that Trump had asked him to "let go" of potential charges against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Comey's memos, along with his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, provided insight into his interactions with Trump.

The controversy surrounding Comey's dismissal and the ongoing investigations into Russian interference led to the appointment of Robert Mueller as a special counsel to investigate Russian meddling and related issues. The firing also sparked discussions about the independence of the FBI and concerns about political interference.

While Trump had the legal authority to fire Comey, the circumstances surrounding the dismissal and the potential impact on ongoing investigations have raised questions about possible obstruction of justice. Proving such a case would be challenging, given the need to establish corrupt intent. However, the firing of Comey, along with other actions by Trump, contributed to a pattern of concerns about his administration's interference in investigations and the integrity of the justice system.

Trump's intent behind firing Comey is key to proving any wrongdoing

While Donald Trump had the authority to fire FBI Director James Comey, the question of whether he broke the law by doing so hinges on his intentions. Trump's intent is key to proving any wrongdoing, as courts have ruled that otherwise lawful acts can constitute obstruction of justice if done with corrupt intentions.

Trump's firing of Comey during the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections and alleged collusion with his presidential campaign raised suspicions about his motives. Comey had also reportedly refused to publicly confirm that Trump was not personally under investigation. Trump's critics, including legal scholars and ethics lawyers, argued that the dismissal could be construed as an obstruction of justice, a punishable offense that occurs when a lawful act is carried out with corrupt intentions.

However, proving Trump's specific intent to obstruct justice is challenging. Trump offered multiple explanations for Comey's firing, including his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the need to restore public trust in the FBI. Trump also stated that he had considered firing Comey since the beginning of his presidency. These justifications, along with the absence of direct evidence of Trump's intentions, make it difficult to prove wrongdoing in his decision to fire Comey.

While Trump's actions may not have broken the law, they have been described as a challenge to the system of checks and balances and a threat to the independence of the FBI. The firing of Comey and its aftermath underscore the importance of understanding the president's intent to determine if any wrongdoing occurred.

Comey's memos could be evidence in an obstruction investigation

On May 9, 2017, US President Donald Trump fired James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In the aftermath of Comey's dismissal, he asked a friend to share excerpts from a series of memos he had written as FBI Director, recounting private conversations with Trump. According to Comey, Trump had asked him to "let go" of potential charges against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

In light of the dismissal, the memos, and Comey's testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee in June 2017, several media figures, political opponents, and legal scholars said that Trump's acts could be construed as obstruction of justice.

Comey's memos documented what he perceived as the president's improper efforts to influence a continuing investigation. Comey shared his notes with a small circle of people at the FBI and the Justice Department. Comey and other senior FBI officials perceived Trump's remarks as an effort to influence the investigation.

Comey explained that he documented his conversations with Trump because he was concerned that Trump might lie about them. Contemporaneous notes created by FBI agents are frequently relied upon in court as credible evidence of conversations.

Some legal experts have said that Comey's testimony advanced the argument that Trump attempted to obstruct justice in his dealings with the former FBI Director. However, others have argued that Trump's request does not neatly fit into any of the practices commonly considered to fall under the obstruction of justice statute.

Comey's memos could be considered evidence in an obstruction investigation, as they provide a detailed account of conversations between Trump and Comey, which can be used to understand the intention behind Trump's request to "let go" of the investigation into Michael Flynn.

Trump's firing of Comey may have been an abuse of power

On May 9, 2017, US President Donald Trump fired James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This move raised concerns about possible political interference by a sitting president into an existing investigation by a leading law enforcement agency. Comey was leading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections and alleged collusion with Trump's presidential campaign.

While Trump had the authority to dismiss Comey, the firing may have been an abuse of power and an "obstruction of justice". Obstruction of justice is a broad legal concept that criminalizes actions that impede official investigations. Section 1512 of Title 18, for example, provides for the punishment of anyone who corruptly "obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding". A conviction under this provision can result in up to 20 years in prison.

Trump's firing of Comey could potentially fall under this statute, as it may have been done with corrupt intentions to impede the Russia investigation. However, proving obstruction of justice is challenging, as it requires demonstrating that Trump had a specific intent to obstruct. Trump has stated multiple reasons for Comey's dismissal, including his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the need to restore public trust in the FBI.

The controversy surrounding Comey's dismissal and the ongoing Russia investigation led to calls for a special prosecutor or independent commission to investigate. The appointment of a special counsel, Robert Mueller, to oversee the Russia investigation was a significant development. The final report from the special counsel's investigation, submitted in March 2019, may provide further insights into whether Trump's actions constituted an abuse of power or obstruction of justice.

Comey's firing was controversial and shocked many FBI agents

The firing of FBI Director James Comey by President Donald Trump on May 9, 2017, was highly controversial and shocked many FBI agents. Comey was well-liked within the FBI, and his abrupt dismissal in the midst of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election stunned many agents, who admired his political independence. The termination decision was viewed as an extraordinary and unprecedented move that damaged morale within the FBI. The manner in which Comey learned of his firing, through television news reports while he was in Los Angeles, further angered agents, who considered it disrespectful.

The controversial nature of Comey's firing stemmed from concerns about possible political interference by a sitting president into an ongoing investigation by a leading law enforcement agency. Comey was overseeing an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and potential collusion with the Trump campaign. Trump's decision to dismiss Comey raised suspicions and led to accusations of obstruction of justice. The timing of the dismissal, just days after Comey reportedly requested additional resources for the Russia investigation, fuelled suspicions about Trump's motives.

Trump initially cited the recommendations of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as the reason for Comey's dismissal. However, it later emerged that Trump had already decided to fire Comey and had solicited the Rosenstein memo the day before as a justification. Trump also stated that Comey's dismissal relieved pressure on his ability to engage with Russia and that he was frustrated by Comey's refusal to publicly confirm that he was not personally under investigation.

The firing of Comey sparked intense debate and criticism from various experts, politicians, and FBI agents. Some legal scholars and politicians accused Trump of obstructing justice, while others disagreed, highlighting the complexity of proving obstruction. The controversy surrounding Comey's dismissal led to calls for special investigations and fuelled discussions about the independence of the FBI and the integrity of its investigations.

Frequently asked questions