Trump's Arlington Visit: Lawful Or Not?

On August 26, 2024, former US President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony to commemorate US service members killed in the Afghanistan War. Trump's campaign staff were involved in a physical altercation with a cemetery official who tried to prevent them from filming and taking photographs in Section 60, a site for military personnel killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Despite warnings, the Trump campaign posted footage on social media, which officials stated was a flagrant violation of the law prohibiting partisan actions at military cemeteries. The incident sparked a debate over the legality and ethics of political actions in sacred spaces, with critics arguing that Trump's visit was a campaign event aimed at highlighting the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Trump's campaign may have violated federal law by filming an ad at Arlington Cemetery

On August 26, 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony to commemorate the third anniversary of the deadly attack on U.S. troops in Afghanistan during the U.S. withdrawal from the country. Trump was accompanied by campaign aides, and his team shared images of the event in a campaign-oriented way.

The controversy surrounding Trump's visit centres on whether his campaign aides violated federal law by filming in Section 60 of the cemetery, a site dedicated to fallen soldiers of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. According to a U.S. defence official, Trump's team was warned multiple times that filming in this area was prohibited, but they proceeded anyway, resulting in a physical altercation with a cemetery employee who tried to stop them.

Arlington National Cemetery's statement suggested that the Trump campaign may have violated federal law, specifically 32 CFR § 553.32. This law mandates that the executive director of the Army National Military Cemeteries ensures the sanctity of public and private memorial and ceremonial events. It states that memorial services and ceremonies must be purely memorial in purpose and must not include partisan political activities.

Given that Trump holds no official government position and was accompanied by campaign aides, the political intent of the visit seems evident. The Trump campaign has actively criticised the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the imagery from the cemetery was used to support Trump's political narrative.

Tanya Marsh, an expert on funeral and cemetery law, stated that cemeteries have broad authority to establish rules for visitors, including barring campaign photography if it is deemed to support partisan political activities. If the Trump campaign filmed during the wreath-laying ceremony for partisan purposes, it could be considered a violation of federal law.

The Trump campaign has defended its actions by sharing snippets of emails and text messages suggesting they had clearance from the cemetery and approval from the families. However, these communications did not specifically address the restrictions in Section 60. While family approval may soften the perception of the campaign's actions, it does not override the legal and ethical considerations set forth by the cemetery's regulations.

The full extent of the legal and political repercussions of this incident remains unclear. Even if the Trump campaign's activities were illegal, the law does not specify criminal penalties. However, the controversy has sparked criticism and may impact public perception of Trump's campaign, particularly among those who view Arlington National Cemetery as a symbol of national unity and reverence.

Trump's staff shoved an Arlington employee who tried to stop them from filming

On August 26, 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony to commemorate the third anniversary of a deadly attack on U.S. troops in Afghanistan during the U.S. withdrawal from the country. Trump was accompanied by campaign aides, and his team shared images of the event in a campaign-oriented way. This prompted questions about whether Trump's campaign had broken the law by engaging in political activities at a military cemetery.

At the center of the controversy was Trump's visit to Section 60 of the cemetery, a location dedicated to fallen soldiers of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. According to reports, Trump's campaign aides were informed multiple times that filming in this area was prohibited. However, they allegedly proceeded with shooting photos and videos, leading to a physical altercation with a cemetery employee who tried to stop them.

The U.S. Army, in a rare statement, confirmed the incident and said that the employee was "'abruptly pushed aside' by Trump aides. The cemetery employee declined to press charges, citing fears of retaliation from Trump supporters. Trump's campaign officials denied the allegations and issued inflammatory statements about the employee, accusing them of having a "mental health episode."

The legal question revolves around whether Trump's actions constituted "partisan political activities" prohibited by federal law, specifically 32 CFR § 553.32. This law mandates that memorial services and ceremonies at Army National Military Cemeteries must be purely memorial in purpose and must not include partisan political activities. Given that Trump holds no official government position and was accompanied by campaign aides, the political intent behind the visit seems evident.

The ethical implications of the incident are also significant, as Arlington National Cemetery is a sacred place for fallen soldiers. The use of such a site for political gain has been widely criticized. The controversy has sparked discussions about the need for clearer regulations to protect the sanctity of military cemeteries and prevent their exploitation for political purposes.

Trump's campaign was warned not to take photos or videos at the event

On August 26, 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery, where he participated in a wreath-laying ceremony to commemorate the third anniversary of a deadly attack on U.S. troops in Afghanistan during the U.S. withdrawal from the country. Trump was accompanied by campaign aides, and his team shared images of the event in a campaign-oriented manner.

Prior to the event, Trump's campaign was explicitly warned not to take photographs or videos during the ceremony, particularly in Section 60 of the cemetery, which is a sacred burial site for military personnel killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Despite these warnings, Trump's staff proceeded to film and take photographs, and two campaign staffers "abruptly pushed aside" a cemetery employee who tried to intervene.

The U.S. Army and Arlington National Cemetery officials confirmed that participants in the ceremony were made aware of federal laws, Army regulations, and DoD policies prohibiting political activities on cemetery grounds. The Trump campaign's use of footage from the event was deemed a flagrant violation of the law against partisan actions at military cemeteries.

The incident sparked widespread criticism and ethical concerns, as Arlington National Cemetery is considered a solemn and hallowed ground for fallen soldiers. The controversy also prompted discussions about the need for clearer regulations to protect the sanctity of military cemeteries from political exploitation.

Trump's campaign posted footage on social media in violation of the law

On August 26, 2024, former President Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery to participate in a wreath-laying ceremony honouring US service members who lost their lives during the Afghanistan evacuation. Trump's campaign staff were reportedly involved in a physical altercation with a cemetery official who attempted to prevent them from filming and taking photographs in Section 60, where US soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan are buried. Despite repeated warnings, the Trump campaign proceeded to film in this area, with two staffers "abruptly pushing aside" the cemetery employee.

Trump's campaign confirmed an "incident" at the cemetery and stated that a "private photographer" had been permitted on the premises. They denied allegations of any physical altercation, with spokesperson Steven Cheung accusing the cemetery staffer of having a "mental health episode". The campaign also claimed they had received permission from the families of the deceased soldiers to be present and take photographs.

However, the U.S. Army and Arlington National Cemetery officials stated that the Trump campaign was made aware of federal laws prohibiting political activities on cemetery grounds. They emphasised that an employee who tried to enforce these rules was pushed aside by Trump aides. The Army also criticised the campaign for attacking the employee in the press, with Trump advisers calling the worker a "despicable individual" and falsely claiming that they had a "mental health episode".

Trump's TikTok post featured clips of his visit, including footage of him saying, "And then they took over that disaster — the leaving of Afghanistan." The caption read: "Should have never happened." This use of footage from the cemetery has been widely condemned as a flagrant violation of the law against partisan actions at military cemeteries.

The controversy surrounding the incident has sparked a heated debate over the legality and ethics of political actions in such solemn spaces. While the full extent of the legal and political repercussions remains unclear, the incident has drawn criticism and calls for transparency from Democratic lawmakers.

The incident may have been a violation of the Hatch Act

The incident at Arlington National Cemetery involving Donald Trump's campaign aides has sparked a debate about the potential violation of the Hatch Act. While there are differing opinions on the legality of the incident, it is essential to examine the specific details and the relevant legal framework to determine if a violation occurred.

The controversy centres around Trump's campaign aides, who were reportedly taking photos and videos in Section 60 of the cemetery, an area dedicated to fallen soldiers of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. According to a U.S. defence official, the aides were informed multiple times that filming in this area was prohibited. However, they allegedly proceeded, resulting in a physical altercation, although the severity of the incident has been disputed by the Trump campaign.

The relevant legal framework cited by Arlington National Cemetery in its statement is 32 CFR § 553.32, which mandates that the executive director of Army National Military Cemeteries ensures the sanctity of public and private memorial events. The law specifically prohibits partisan political activities during memorial services and ceremonies. Given that Trump holds no official government position and was accompanied by campaign aides, the political intent of the visit seems evident, particularly as the imagery was shared in a manner that supported Trump's political narrative.

Tanya Marsh, an expert on funeral and cemetery law, states that cemeteries have the authority to establish rules for visitors, including barring campaign photography if it is deemed to support partisan political activities. If the Trump campaign filmed during the wreath-laying ceremony for partisan purposes, it could be considered a violation of federal law. However, it is important to note that the law does not specify criminal penalties for such violations.

The incident has raised ethical concerns as well, as Arlington National Cemetery is a sacred place of national importance. The use of such a space for political purposes can be seen as a breach of the cemetery's sanctity. While politics are often inherent at the cemetery, with military families using it as a platform to hold leaders accountable, the involvement of a political campaign in these activities has crossed a line for many. The Trump campaign's defence, including sharing snippets of emails and texts suggesting clearance from the cemetery and approval from families, does not override the legal and ethical considerations set forth by cemetery regulations.

In conclusion, while the legal consequences remain uncertain, the ethical implications are clear. The use of a sacred space like Section 60 for political purposes is a matter of significant concern. The incident highlights the need to maintain the sanctity of such spaces and reevaluate how political campaigns engage with them.

Frequently asked questions