Wall Street Bets: Legal Or Illegal?

In January 2021, members of the subreddit r/WallStreetBets coordinated to buy GameStop stocks en masse, creating a short squeeze that forced hedge fund Melvin Capital to buy more GameStop (GME) stock to cover its position. This resulted in a surge in GameStop's stock price, which rose by over 400% in a week, from \$21 a month prior to \$326. While this move by r/WallStreetBets may have been unconventional, it does raise the question: did their actions constitute illegal activity?

Did WallStreetBets engage in market manipulation?

In late January 2021, the WallStreetBets subreddit was involved in a battle with the hedge fund Melvin Capital, driving up the stock price of companies like GameStop and AMC Entertainment. This resulted in Melvin Capital having to buy GME to cover its position, and the company ultimately receiving a $3 billion infusion from Citadel and Point72 to shore up its finances.

The actions of the WallStreetBets community have been described by some as market manipulation. Market manipulation is generally defined as a deliberate attempt to interfere with the free and fair operation of the market and create artificial, false, or misleading appearances with respect to the price of a security, commodity, or item. In this case, the WallStreetBets community publicly announced their positions and encouraged others to buy similar positions, which created a self-fulfilling prophecy and drove up stock prices.

However, it is worth noting that the line between legal and illegal behaviour in this context is not always clear. For example, announcing one's position may be considered market manipulation if done by a group of individuals coordinating their actions, but it is not necessarily illegal for a single individual to do so. Additionally, the same behaviour may be considered acceptable if carried out by a billionaire but not if done by less well-off individuals.

Ultimately, the question of whether WallStreetBets engaged in market manipulation is complex and subject to interpretation. While their actions may have had a significant impact on stock prices, it is difficult to determine whether their behaviour crossed the line into illegal territory. As of February 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were investigating the situation to determine exactly what happened.

Did WallStreetBets' actions destabilize the market?

WallStreetBets is a popular, juvenile, foul-mouthed Reddit page with a community known for irreverent market discussions. It describes itself as "Like 4chan found a Bloomberg Terminal". In other words, it's a bunch of internet "shitposters" interested in making money on the stock market. It can often be hard to decipher what is real and what is a joke on the board, making the whole subreddit an entertaining mess.

WallStreetBets drove up GameStop's stock price in a battle with the hedge fund Melvin Capital. GameStop shares have soared 1,700% as millions of small investors, egged on by social media, employ a classic Wall Street tactic to put the squeeze on Wall Street. On Wall Street, individual investors are often derided as "dumb money", destined to lose against the highly compensated analysts and traders who buy and sell stocks for a living. But in recent days, individual investors have banded together to put the squeeze on at least two hedge funds that had bet that GameStop's shares would fall.

While the hedge funds and other professional money managers had been shorting GameStop's shares, betting that its stock was doomed to decline, the retail investors—online traders, mom-and-pop investors, small brokers, and others—have been pushing the other way, buying shares and stock options. That caused GameStop's market value to increase to over $24 billion from $2 billion in a matter of days. Its shares have risen over 1,700% since December. Between Tuesday and Wednesday, the market value rose over $10 billion.

Some on Wall Street grew concerned that the buying frenzy from the Reddit crowd could potentially destabilize the market and hurt overall confidence. Meanwhile, mounting losses from hedge funds could spill over to other areas of the market. However, it is difficult to prove that WallStreetBets' actions were illegal. If a big group of traders simply decides to buy options on a stock simultaneously, out in the open, for the fun of it, proving malfeasance may be difficult.

What was the legality of WallStreetBets' use of social media?

The use of social media by WallStreetBets (WSB) has been a key factor in the recent surge in GameStop's stock price. WSB is a community on Reddit, known for its irreverent discussions about the stock market. It has attracted millions of amateur traders who have been egged on by social media to employ a classic Wall Street tactic: the short squeeze. This has resulted in a buying frenzy that has pushed up the stock price of not only GameStop but also other companies such as AMC Entertainment and BlackBerry.

While the use of social media by WSB has been effective in rallying investors, it is important to note that it has also led to concerns about the legality of their activities. Some of the content posted on the WSB message board has been called into question, with the messaging platform Discord banning the WSB server due to hate speech, glorification of violence, and spreading misinformation. Additionally, a Reddit spokesperson stated that the site prohibits "posting illegal content or soliciting or facilitating illegal transactions" and that they will "review and cooperate with valid law enforcement investigations or actions as needed."

The legality of WSB's use of social media is a complex issue. On the one hand, WSB's activities can be seen as a form of free speech and the right to assemble. However, there are also concerns about potential market manipulation and the spread of misinformation. It is important to note that while WSB's activities may be coordinated, it does not necessarily mean they are illegal. Proving market manipulation or fraud can be difficult, especially when a large group of traders openly decides to buy options on a stock simultaneously.

The use of social media by WSB has also raised concerns about the potential impact on the overall market. Some worry that the buying frenzy could destabilize the market and hurt overall confidence, with mounting losses from hedge funds spilling over to other areas of the market. As a result, officials at the SEC and other regulatory bodies are closely monitoring internet chat rooms and message boards for any signs of illegal activity or market manipulation.

In conclusion, the legality of WallStreetBets' use of social media is a complex and evolving issue. While their activities may straddle the line between free speech and market manipulation, it is important for regulatory bodies to closely monitor the situation and take action if any illegal activity is identified.

Did WallStreetBets' actions constitute fraud?

WallStreetBets is a popular, juvenile, and foul-mouthed Reddit page that describes itself as "Like 4chan found a Bloomberg Terminal." The group is known for its irreverent market discussions and has been accused of posting hate speech, glorifying violence, and spreading misinformation. While the exact nature of the group's activities and intentions are unclear, some have raised concerns that their actions could constitute fraud or market manipulation.

To understand if WallStreetBets' actions constitute fraud, it is essential to examine the nature of the group's activities and their potential impact on the market. WallStreetBets has been described as a group of "internet shitposters interested in making money on the stock market." They have been known to target heavily shorted stocks, pushing their prices higher and squeezing out short-selling hedge funds. In the case of GameStop, WallStreetBets users coordinated to buy GameStop options en masse, creating a short squeeze that forced hedge fund Melvin Capital, which had bet against the stock, to buy GME to cover its position. This resulted in a significant loss for Melvin Capital, with Citadel and Point72 infusing $3 billion into the fund to shore up its finances.

While the actions of WallStreetBets may seem like a coordinated effort to manipulate the market, proving fraud or illegal activity may be challenging. As Duke law professor James Cox stated, "it's an enforcement nightmare." Officials at the SEC and other regulatory bodies are closely monitoring internet chat rooms for potential signs of market manipulation, but without clear evidence of fraud, their ability to intervene is limited. Additionally, the decentralized nature of the group and the fact that they are operating in a public forum make it difficult to attribute specific actions or intentions to individual members.

Furthermore, the buying frenzy fueled by WallStreetBets could be argued as a form of "meme stock" investing, where investors make decisions based on viral trends and social media hype rather than traditional fundamental or technical analysis. While this may be considered reckless or irresponsible, it is not necessarily fraudulent. The group's activities highlight the challenges faced by regulators in distinguishing between coordinated market manipulation and the collective actions of individual investors acting on their own behalf.

In conclusion, while the actions of WallStreetBets have raised concerns about potential fraud or market manipulation, proving malfeasance may be difficult. The group's decentralized nature, the public forum in which they operate, and the lack of clear evidence of fraudulent intent all contribute to the complexity of the situation. As the line between coordinated manipulation and collective individual action blurs in the age of social media and online communities, regulators are faced with the daunting task of adapting to new challenges and ensuring the integrity of the market.

Did WallStreetBets' actions constitute insider trading?

Insider trading is the buying or selling of a company's securities by individuals who possess material, nonpublic information about that company. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) defines an insider as "an officer, director, 10% stockholder and anyone who possesses inside information because of his or her relationship with the Company or with an officer, director or principal stockholder of the Company."

In the context of WallStreetBets, it is important to note that not all trading by insiders is illegal. Insider trading is illegal when individuals with access to material, nonpublic information use that privileged knowledge to trade securities. This typically involves trading by insiders, "tipping" or sharing confidential information with another person who then trades on that information, misappropriation by individuals who are not traditional insiders such as lawyers or consultants, and front-running, where a broker or analyst uses advance knowledge of a pending order to trade for their own account before filling client orders.

In the case of WallStreetBets, there may be questions about whether the actions of its users constituted illegal insider trading. While the users were coordinating their purchases of GameStop options en masse, it is not clear if they possessed material, nonpublic information about the company. The information that was being acted upon appeared to be publicly available on the message board and was not necessarily confidential.

However, there have been separate instances of insider trading accusations within the WallStreetBets community. In one case, the subreddit's founder, jartek, was banned after allegations emerged that he used the platform for personal gain by promoting an organisation and its eSports trading competition within the subreddit. In this instance, jartek was accused of recommending stock purchases without disclosing that he would personally benefit from these purchases, which could potentially violate SEC regulations.

Frequently asked questions