Abortion Laws: Reducing Abortions Or Creating More Problems?

Abortion laws have been a topic of debate for decades, with varying opinions on their effectiveness in reducing abortion rates. While some argue that restrictive legislation is necessary to curb abortions, evidence suggests that such laws do not necessarily decrease abortions but instead make them less safe. This is particularly true in places where abortion is stigmatized, criminalized, or restricted, forcing individuals to resort to unsafe methods. The criminalization of abortion creates a chilling effect, deterring healthcare providers from offering the best care options and patients from seeking post-abortion care. Restrictive laws also disproportionately impact marginalized communities, as health services are generally less accessible to these groups. Furthermore, abortion bans can have severe health consequences, with pregnancy-related deaths projected to increase by 21% in the absence of safe abortion options. As a result, it is essential to address the social, cultural, and economic barriers that hinder individuals from exercising their reproductive rights and ensure access to safe and legal abortions.

The impact of abortion laws on maternal mortality rates

Abortion laws have a significant impact on maternal mortality rates. Restrictive abortion laws are associated with higher maternal mortality rates, particularly among women of colour, low-income individuals, and those from marginalised communities.

In the United States, for example, the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973 legalised abortion and reduced maternal mortality rates by 30-40% for people of colour. However, in recent years, there has been a growing trend of restrictive abortion policies, with over 90 such policies enacted since 2021. These restrictions create barriers to abortion access, particularly for low-income people of colour, immigrants, and non-English speakers. As a result, maternal mortality rates have been increasing, with abortion-restriction states having 62% higher maternal death rates compared to states with greater abortion access.

Research has found that states with more restrictive abortion policies have higher total maternal mortality rates. A study by Tulane researchers examined the association between state abortion policy context in 2015 and maternal deaths from 2015 to 2018. They found that states with a higher score on the abortion policy composite index, which includes factors such as gestational age limits and mandatory counselling, had a 7% increase in total maternal mortality. Additionally, states with licensed physician requirements had a 51% higher total maternal mortality rate, and restrictions on state Medicaid funding for abortion were associated with a 29% increase.

The impact of restrictive abortion laws is further exacerbated by the pre-existing racial disparities in maternal health. Black birthing people in the United States are already 2-4 times more likely to experience maternal mortality and morbidity than their white counterparts. Restrictive abortion laws disproportionately affect Black individuals, leading to increased rates of mortality and adverse outcomes. One study estimates that a total abortion ban in the United States would result in an additional 140 maternal deaths annually, a 21% increase overall.

Furthermore, restrictive abortion laws can lead to a decrease in abortion training and education for medical professionals. This exacerbates racial inequities in maternal health by limiting the quality of routine obstetric care in certain geographic regions and reducing opportunities for provider diversity. The lack of abortion education and training can also impact the quality of care for patients requiring miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy care.

Overall, restrictive abortion laws have a detrimental effect on maternal mortality rates, particularly for marginalised communities. The evidence suggests that increasing access to safe and legal abortions can reduce maternal deaths and improve health outcomes, especially for those who are most vulnerable.

Abortion laws and the safety of abortions

Abortion laws have a significant impact on the safety of abortions, and restrictive laws can lead to unsafe abortion practices and negative health outcomes for pregnant individuals. The relationship between abortion access and rates is complex, and evidence suggests that restricting abortions does not reduce the number of abortions but rather makes them less safe.

In places with restrictive abortion laws, people may resort to unsafe abortion methods, which can have serious physical and mental health consequences. Unsafe abortions are defined as those performed by untrained individuals or in environments that do not meet medical standards. This can include the use of dangerous and invasive methods, increasing the risk of incomplete abortions, heavy bleeding, uterine perforation, and damage to the genital tract and internal organs.

The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of comprehensive abortion care, which includes providing information, abortion management, and post-abortion care. When people face barriers to safe and timely abortions, such as criminalization, social stigma, and discrimination, they often turn to unsafe alternatives. This lack of access to quality abortion care can violate a range of human rights, including the right to life, health, bodily autonomy, and freedom from cruel and inhumane treatment.

Research supports the notion that abortion restrictions do not lower rates but may increase pregnancy-related deaths. A study in Texas, where abortion care is banned as early as five weeks into pregnancy, found a 56% increase in maternal mortality rates from 2019 to 2022, compared to an 11% increase nationwide. This disparity is attributed to the abortion ban, as denying abortions leads to more women carrying pregnancies to term, which carries a greater risk of death than having an abortion.

Additionally, restrictive abortion laws disproportionately affect marginalized communities, including low-income individuals, refugees, migrants, LGBTIQ+ individuals, and racialized and Indigenous people. These communities often face additional barriers to accessing safe abortion services, such as travel costs and discriminatory healthcare practices, further exacerbating the negative impact of restrictive abortion laws on their health and well-being.

Abortion laws and the mental health of pregnant people

Abortion laws have a significant impact on the mental health of pregnant people, and this impact is often negative. Research shows that restricting access to safe and legal abortions can cause harm to mental health, with people who are denied abortions experiencing more anxiety, stress, and lower life satisfaction than those who receive them. The stigma surrounding abortion and the lack of knowledge about it also contribute to negative mental health outcomes.

The mental health consequences of abortion restrictions are not limited to those seeking abortions but extend to the wider population. In states with trigger laws that banned abortion after the Dobbs ruling, there was a small but significant increase in self-reported anxiety and depression symptoms, particularly among females aged 18 to 45. This impact on mental health may be due to the loss of reproductive autonomy and the risks associated with living in a state where abortion is not accessible if needed.

Additionally, abortion laws can create barriers to accessing abortion care, leading to delayed abortion care or preventing people from obtaining the abortion they want. These barriers can include increased travel costs, lodging expenses, childcare during travel, and missed wages from taking time off work. Such challenges can cause psychological distress and negatively impact the mental health of pregnant people.

It is important to note that having an abortion is not inherently linked to mental health issues. Scientific research from around the world has consistently shown that obtaining a wanted abortion does not increase the risk of depression, anxiety, or suicidal thoughts. The belief that abortion leads to mental health problems is often perpetuated by anti-abortion advocacy groups and is not supported by mainstream medical communities.

The bottom line is that abortion laws that restrict access to safe and legal abortions can negatively impact the mental health of pregnant people and the wider population. Restricting access to abortion care can lead to increased anxiety, stress, and lower life satisfaction among those denied abortions, while also contributing to stigma and creating barriers to care. At the same time, obtaining a wanted abortion is not associated with significant psychological problems, and relief is the primary emotion felt by most women after the procedure.

Abortion laws and the financial costs of abortions

Abortion laws can have a significant impact on the financial costs associated with the procedure. In places where abortion is restricted or criminalised, people often resort to unsafe methods, which can lead to increased medical expenses and long-term health issues. On the other hand, in regions where abortion is legal and accessible, individuals may face lower financial burdens as they can obtain safe and affordable procedures without incurring additional travel or treatment costs.

The financial costs of abortion can vary depending on multiple factors, such as the type of abortion, the stage of pregnancy, the location, and insurance coverage. The cost of abortion pills, also known as medication abortion, can reach up to $800, while the average cost at Planned Parenthood is approximately $580. In-clinic abortions may cost around $800 in the first trimester, with the average being about $600 at Planned Parenthood. The cost increases during the second trimester, ranging from $715 to $1,500-$2,000, depending on how far along the pregnancy is.

Abortion laws play a crucial role in determining the financial burden on individuals seeking the procedure. In countries like Zambia, where abortion is legal under specific conditions, the average cost for a safe abortion at a health facility was $62, while seeking treatment for complications from an unsafe abortion averaged $81. This disparity highlights the financial implications of abortion laws, as those who undergo unsafe abortions often incur higher costs due to the need for additional medical care.

Additionally, the availability of public health facilities offering free or subsidised abortions can significantly impact the financial costs. For example, in Burkina Faso, women paid significantly more than the official tariff of $7 for post-abortion care, with expenses reaching at least $19. This discrepancy between the official cost and the amount paid by women underscores the financial challenges they face, even in locations with supportive policies in place.

The financial implications of abortion laws also extend beyond the direct costs of the procedure. Travel expenses, lost wages due to time off work, and the opportunity costs associated with seeking an abortion can further burden individuals. Social stigma and discrimination may also play a role in the financial costs, as individuals may need to travel greater distances or incur additional expenses to access abortion services discreetly.

Overall, abortion laws have a direct impact on the financial costs associated with the procedure. Restrictive laws can lead to higher costs as individuals may resort to unsafe methods or face limited access to affordable and safe options. Conversely, in places where abortion is legal and accessible, the financial burden may be reduced, especially with the availability of public health services.

Abortion laws and the human rights of pregnant people

Abortion laws have a direct impact on the human rights of pregnant people. The criminalisation of abortion and the existence of restrictive abortion laws create barriers for people seeking abortions. These laws violate the human rights of pregnant people, particularly their right to health, life, bodily autonomy, privacy, liberty, equality, and non-discrimination.

The right to health is jeopardised when access to safe and legal abortion is restricted or banned. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), complications from pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of death for girls and young women aged 15 to 19, and children aged 10 to 14 face higher risks of health complications and death from pregnancy than adults. The lack of access to safe and legal abortion care can lead to unsafe abortions, which are the third leading cause of preventable maternal deaths worldwide, according to the WHO.

The right to life is also at risk when abortion access is limited. Legal restrictions often result in more illegal abortions, which may be unsafe and drive up maternal mortality and morbidity. Carrying a pregnancy to term can be deadlier than having an abortion, as the risk of death for the pregnant person is higher during live births than during abortion procedures.

Bodily autonomy and privacy rights are infringed upon by abortion laws that restrict a person's ability to make autonomous decisions about their body and reproductive life. Forcing someone to continue an unwanted pregnancy or seek an unsafe abortion violates their privacy and bodily autonomy.

The liberty and security of the person are also impacted by criminal abortion laws, as they instill fear and deter people from seeking emergency services for pregnancy-related complications, including miscarriages.

Abortion laws also contribute to inequality and discrimination, particularly affecting marginalised communities. People on fixed or lower incomes, refugees, migrants, adolescents, lesbian and bisexual women, transgender and gender non-conforming individuals, and minority or Indigenous women face disproportionate challenges in accessing safe abortions. The criminalisation of abortion neglects the specific health needs of pregnant people and compounds the difficulties faced by marginalised communities in accessing healthcare services.

Furthermore, restrictive abortion laws do not decrease abortion rates; instead, they push abortions underground and into unsafe, unregulated settings. This increases the risk of unsafe procedures and legal repercussions for those seeking abortions.

Frequently asked questions