Abortion Laws: Preventing Or Promoting Illegal Abortions?

Abortion laws have a direct impact on people's ability to seek abortions. In places where abortion is legal and accessible, people can obtain abortions safely and without risk. However, in places where abortion is stigmatised, criminalised, or restricted, people often resort to unsafe abortions, which can lead to fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities. Restrictive abortion laws can also cause distress and stigma and may violate human rights, including the right to privacy, non-discrimination, and equality. Additionally, such laws can impose financial burdens on individuals seeking abortions, especially those with limited resources.

The legal status of abortion varies across the world. While some countries have liberalised their abortion laws, others have made abortion more restricted or entirely illegal. The United States, for example, has seen a regression in abortion rights with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, allowing states to ban abortion outright. This has resulted in a divide between abortion deserts, where abortion is illegal and inaccessible, and abortion havens, where abortion care remains available.

The impact of abortion laws on illegal abortions is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, restrictive abortion laws can deter people from seeking illegal abortions due to fear of legal consequences. On the other hand, these laws can also drive people to seek unsafe and illegal abortions, putting their health and lives at risk. The availability of safe and legal abortion services is crucial in reducing the number of illegal abortions and ensuring the well-being of those seeking abortions.

The impact of restrictive abortion laws on women's health

Restrictive abortion laws have a detrimental impact on women's health, and this impact is felt most acutely in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). When abortion is criminalised or heavily restricted, women are forced to resort to unsafe abortion methods, which can lead to severe health complications and even death. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), nearly 8% of maternal deaths globally are attributed to unsafe abortions, and millions of women are admitted to hospitals each year due to related complications. Restrictive abortion laws also contribute to the loss of educational and economic opportunities for women, as well as the deepening of historical marginalisation.

Barriers to Safe Abortion

A woman's ability to access safe abortion services is often limited by a range of barriers, including restrictive abortion laws, lack of knowledge about abortion laws or locations that provide abortion services, high costs, judgmental provider attitudes, scarcity of facilities and medical equipment, and stigma on social and religious grounds. These barriers result in a staggering number of deaths and disabilities each year, with low- and middle-income countries bearing the brunt of these consequences.

Health Implications of Restrictive Abortion Laws

Restricting women's access to safe and legal abortion services has significant negative health implications. Rather than reducing the number of abortions, restrictive laws drive women to seek out unsafe abortion methods, putting their lives and health at risk. According to the WHO, 23,000 women die from unsafe abortions each year, and tens of thousands more experience serious health complications. A study estimated that banning abortion in the United States would lead to a 21% increase in pregnancy-related deaths overall and a 33% increase among Black women, as the risks associated with carrying a pregnancy to term are higher than those of abortion.

Impact on Education and Economic Opportunities

Restrictive abortion laws also have indirect impacts on women's health and well-being by limiting their educational and economic opportunities. When women are denied access to safe abortion services, they may be forced to continue with unwanted pregnancies, which can disrupt their education and make it difficult to participate in the workforce or public and political life. This disruption can have long-term consequences for their economic stability and overall health and well-being.

Addressing Restrictive Abortion Laws

To mitigate the negative impacts of restrictive abortion laws on women's health, it is crucial to address the legal and societal barriers that hinder access to safe abortion services. This includes reforming restrictive abortion laws, improving access to comprehensive reproductive health care, and implementing measures to destigmatise abortion. Additionally, improving social safety net programs for women can help reduce gender gaps and enhance their overall health and well-being, potentially leading to a decrease in the number of abortions over time.

The decriminalisation of abortion

Arguments for Decriminalisation

Abortion rights activists argue that decriminalisation is necessary to protect the health and lives of pregnant individuals. They emphasise that criminalising abortion does not stop abortions from occurring but instead pushes them underground, making them unsafe. Unsafe abortions are a leading cause of maternal deaths and disabilities worldwide, with an estimated 25 million unsafe abortions taking place each year. Decriminalisation aims to reduce these risks by bringing abortions into regulated and safe medical settings.

Additionally, proponents of decriminalisation argue that abortion laws disproportionately impact marginalised communities. They maintain that criminalisation, along with restrictive laws and social stigma, create barriers for individuals seeking abortions, particularly those from low-income backgrounds, refugees, migrants, LGBTIQA+ individuals, and racialised and Indigenous people. Decriminalisation is seen as a step towards addressing these inequalities and ensuring equitable access to reproductive healthcare.

The Impact of Criminalisation

The criminalisation of abortion can have severe consequences, as illustrated by the case of a UK woman who was sentenced to over two years in prison for terminating her pregnancy after the legal time limit. Such prosecutions can deter individuals from seeking abortions and create a chilling effect, even in cases where abortions are legally permitted. This can lead to unsafe abortions and negatively impact an individual's ability to make autonomous decisions about their body and future.

Decriminalisation in Practice

While the specifics of decriminalisation may vary depending on the legal and social context of each country or territory, the core principle is to remove criminal penalties associated with abortion and treat it as a healthcare issue rather than a legal one. This shift would involve abolishing laws that criminalise individuals for causing their own abortion or assisting others in doing so. Additionally, there is a push to remove bureaucratic hurdles, such as the requirement for multiple doctors' approvals, which can delay the procedure and limit women's choices.

Global Perspectives

The trend towards liberalisation is evident in various regions, including Latin America, where the Green Wave movement has successfully advocated for abortion law reforms in countries like Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, and elsewhere. However, it is important to note that the United States stands as a notable outlier, with the recent regression of abortion rights following the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022. This decision has resulted in a polarised landscape, with some states banning abortion outright, while others strive to protect and expand access.

The role of international human rights bodies in advocating for abortion law reform

International and regional human rights bodies have played a critical role in advocating for abortion law reform. Over the past two decades, there has been a significant evolution in international and regional human rights norms, recognising that the denial of abortion care violates women's and girls' fundamental human rights. This recognition has influenced national-level abortion laws and advanced law and policy reform.

Human rights bodies have been instrumental in shaping abortion laws in several countries. For example, in Colombia, the Constitutional Court cited international human rights norms when it overturned the criminalisation of abortion in 2006. The court emphasised women's human rights and the need to protect them, including the right to health and reproductive autonomy. Similarly, in Argentina, the Supreme Court of Justice interpreted the country's Penal Code in light of international human rights standards, ensuring access to abortion services for victims of rape.

In Brazil, the Supreme Court authorised abortion in cases of anencephaly, recalling the World Health Organisation's definition of health and recognising the risks posed by anencephalic pregnancies to women's lives and health. Nepal's Supreme Court also cited international and regional standards when establishing that inadequate access to safe and legal abortion is a human rights violation.

International human rights norms have also influenced legislative reform. For instance, Spain's sexual and reproductive health law of 2010 explicitly mentions bringing the country in line with the "international consensus" on reproductive rights. Rwanda amended its Penal Code and lifted a reservation to the Maputo Protocol, a regional human rights instrument, to expand the grounds for legal abortion.

The role of international human rights bodies is crucial in holding states accountable for their human rights obligations and ensuring the protection of women's reproductive rights and autonomy. Their influence extends beyond national borders and has a transformative impact on abortion laws and policies worldwide.

The impact of abortion laws on education, labour market participation and GDP growth

Abortion laws have a significant impact on various economic factors, including education, labour market participation, and GDP growth. Restrictive abortion laws can hinder a person's ability to make decisions about their body and future, affecting their economic trajectory and labour force participation.

Education

Abortion laws can have spillover effects on women's educational attainment. Liberal abortion laws are associated with increased schooling and educational attainment, particularly for Black women and girls. Restrictive abortion laws, on the other hand, can lead to unwanted pregnancies, causing some women to drop out of school or delay their education.

Labour Market Participation

Abortion laws can also impact labour market participation and economic outcomes. Restrictive abortion laws can lead to financial hardships and delays in accessing abortion services, particularly for low-income individuals. This can result in reduced labour force participation, especially among single Black women. Additionally, the inability to obtain a safe and legal abortion can lead to physical and mental health complications, further hindering an individual's ability to work and participate in the labour market.

GDP Growth

Abortion laws can indirectly affect GDP growth through their impact on education and labour market participation. Restrictive abortion laws that hinder women's educational attainment and labour force participation can lead to a less skilled workforce and lower economic productivity, potentially impacting GDP growth. On the other hand, liberal abortion laws that enable women to make decisions about their bodies and futures can contribute to a more educated and skilled workforce, potentially boosting economic growth.

Overall, abortion laws have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond the medical procedure itself. They can impact a person's educational opportunities, labour market participation, and long-term economic trajectory, all of which can have implications for GDP growth and a country's economic development.

The consequences of inaccessible quality abortion care

Inaccessible quality abortion care can have devastating consequences for women's physical and mental health and wellbeing, and it is a critical public health and human rights issue. When people are unable to access safe, affordable, timely, and respectful abortion care, they often resort to unsafe abortion methods, which can lead to serious complications and even death.

Unsafe abortions are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as procedures carried out by untrained individuals or in environments that do not meet minimal medical standards. They are a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, with an estimated 23,000 deaths each year resulting from unsafe abortions. In addition, tens of thousands of women experience significant health complications, including incomplete abortions, haemorrhage, uterine perforation, and damage to the genital tract and internal organs.

The lack of access to quality abortion care also poses risks to a range of human rights for women and girls, including the right to life, the right to physical and mental health, the right to benefit from scientific progress, the right to decide freely on family planning, and the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

The financial costs of unsafe abortions are significant. Complications from unsafe abortions cost health systems in developing countries millions of dollars annually, and households experience substantial income loss due to long-term disabilities. Restrictive abortion laws and social stigma further exacerbate these issues, making it more challenging for women, especially those from marginalized communities, to access safe and legal abortion care.

Furthermore, evidence suggests that restricting access to abortions does not reduce the number of abortions but instead makes them less safe. Countries with highly restrictive abortion laws have significantly higher proportions of unsafe abortions compared to countries with less restrictive laws.

To address these issues, multiple actions are needed at the legal, health system, and community levels. This includes ensuring respect for human rights, improving the availability and accessibility of information, and developing supportive and universally accessible health systems. By removing barriers to quality abortion care, we can reduce the physical, mental, and financial toll on women and work towards a world where abortion is safe, legal, and affordable for all.

Frequently asked questions